В статті досліджується природа соціальної деструктивності. Розглянуті існуючі філософські, психологічні підходи до вивчення причин виникнення агресії і насильства. Робиться висновок про необхідність урахування багатовимірного пояснення цього феномену при плануванні та здійсненні запобігання насильству в цілому та насильству в сім'ї зокрема. ; В статье исследуется природа социальной деструктивности. Рассмотрены существующие философские, психологические подходы к изучению причин возникновения агрессии и насилия. Делается вывод о необходимости учета многомерного объяснения этого феномена при планировании и осуществлении предотвращения насилия в целом и насилия в семье в частности. ; The paper investigates the nature of social destructiveness. The existing philosophical, psychological approaches to the study of the causes of aggression and violence. The modern person, as a rule, is deprived of the choice of the line of conduct, as the defining factor of intention in favour of human cruelty or positive self-realization are the social conditions, social environment. The text reveals the mechanisms of the development or suppression of its own destruction. Particular attention to the social and cultural impact on the formation factors destructiveness. The article focuses on the fact that very negative processes increasingly influence modern man. The article gives the definition of «violence in the family»; the types of violence in the family (between spouses; parents and children; between adult children and parents; between children in one family; violence between other members of the family); characteristics of types of violence in the family (physical, psychological, economic, sexual); the factors contributing to violence in the family have been addressed in detail. The provisions of Ukrainian legislation and international human rights standards in the sphere of protection from violation are analyzed. The conclusion about the necessity of taking into account the multidimensional explanation of this phenomenon in the planning and implementation of violence prevention in general and violence in the family in particular. It can therefore be concluded that this issue must be dealt with, starting from upbringing in a family and finishing with violence prevention on a state legislative level.
This paper studies the subjects of social events in the development of Ukraine which causes the purpose of study. The study of the phenomenon of social event directed at investigation of regularities the binding of the social event fate of society, social groups and individual, due to dynamic processes and the ability of social events serve both as factors of social change and their results. Determining the subjects of social events are detailed in study of their characteristics: the presence of some needs and interests, commitment, volitional element, ability to make decisions that is especially updated at macrolevel of development. The key contradictions that at the present stage the development of Ukraine are identified. There are contradictions of individual and collective, globalization and identity, regional conflicts and contradictions of consistency and uncertainty. It was found that the main problems of subjects the development of the Ukraine are subjectless, public passivity and multiplicity of the subjects of management. Among the subjects of social events we defined the eventmanagers and event makers as organizers of social events; eventors that act directly involved or included in the course of event; eventologists as observers and researchers of social events. Eventmanagers involved in technologized organization of events, most of them are presented of management level in the social system. Eventmakers may be single or collective social subjects that are able to confront even the management system. Eventors are in the body of the management system, engaging in social event, but with no influence on its occurrence. Participate of eventologists in social events is founded in the observation, establishing causality, the content and essence of social event and serves as subject of everyday knowledge and specific research. Attention is focused on the gradation of specific subjects at the micro-, meso-, macro- and meta- levels. The microlevel is presented by individual subjects, people. The mesolevel is presented by local subjects: TNK, public organizations, political parties, public, economic, cultural institutions, educational and research institutions. At the macrolevel the most important subjects of social events are the people and society as social organism of the country. The history of Ukrainian society as a major subject is briefly defined by phases: the emergence of the social organism of the country through structural components; dissociation integrity in national states and empires; independence in the presence of many internal contradictions and finding a major new subject for cooperation. Perspectives of further research in this direction are related to the study the subjects of social events in the determination of development of Ukraine. ; В статье изучаются субъекты социальных событий развития Украины, что обусловливает соответствующую цель исследования. Определение субъектов социальных событий развития детализируется в изучении их характеристик. Установлены ключевые противоречия, которые на современном этапе определяют развитие Украины. Выяснено, что основными проблемами субъектов украинского развития является бессубъектность, общественная пассивность и множественность субъектов управления. Акцентируется внимание на градации определенных субъектов на микро- , мезо- , макро- и мета- уровнях ; У статті вивчаються суб'єкти соціальних подій розвитку України, що обумовило відповідну мету дослідження. Визначення суб'єктів соціальних подій розвитку деталізується у вивченні їх характеристик. Встановлено ключові протиріччя, що на сучасному етапі обумовлюють розвиток України. З'ясовано, що основними проблемами суб'єктів українського розвитку є безсуб'єктність, громадська пасивність та множинність суб'єктів управління. Акцентовано увагу на градації визначених суб'єктів відповідно до мікро-, мезо-, макро- та мета- рівнів
The article is devoted to solving the current problem of finding ways to develop Ukrainian society. Today even amid sharp massive contradictions, split between the people and formal authority, this question still remains open and needs to be solved. Analysis of recent researches and publications shows that the different scenarios and vectors of possible development of Ukraine are discussed. However, among the specified prospects we can see that the negative scenarios of the future of Ukraine are strongly pronounced. The research is base on the achievements of the researchers V. Andrushchenko, V. Bekh, M. Mykhalchenko, M. Lepskyi and others and the contributions on the study of the phenomenon of social event performed by the author. The current needs of Ukrainian society for the development of subjectness in the world space consist in formation of commitment of the government actions and the civil society to the development of social events of development. For this purpose, according to the object in view, the event scenarios of development of Ukraine at the stage of transformation were investigated. Based on the external and internal dialectics, the possible scenarios of development are the external and internal ones. The external scenario is characterized by commitment mainly to the foreign cooperation with the large-scale entities, that require interaction of the subjects of social events associated with the subsequent entry of our country into a large-scale association such as the EU in the capacity of a local or resource subject. Variants of external scenario are European and Eurasian ones. Domination of external scenario means open borders that may cause the "loss" of Ukrainian highly qualified personnel abroad. Under such conditions it is very likely that we will see the high percentage of immigrants and concentration of immigrants in large cities; and such tendency already exists. The absolutization of the external scenario of development of Ukraine will negatively influence the integrity of the country, which is now in an unstable state and needs to be saved. The internal scenario is characterized by commitment to the internal development of the state, the concentration of activities of subjects of social development events in the country, the preparation of the development project through the Ukrainian idea, national interests. The absolutization of the internal scenario of development of Ukraine is dangerous due to the closeness of the country. It is very important to maintain the balance between openness and closeness in the development of society. Considering the scenario of development in the dialectic "obsolete system - new system under formation" we can distinguish the inertial and unstable scenarios. The inertial scenario of the so-called "mark time" is characterized by the absence of social events of development. Such a scenario is not absolutely eventless, but social events will be of negative, destructive nature in case of aggravation of crisis tendencies. The possible prospects of the considered scenarios are saved, but only until some notable crises, because the basic contradictions remain unresolved. We do not exclude the possibility of an unstable scenario that will be characterized by the transition from one chaotic state to another (movement from one strange attractor to another). Chaotic states cause chaotic social events. As a result the development can happen in two vectors - the formation of a new system in place of the obsolete one or in the opposite direction - towards degradation, archaism and then towards collapse. The scenario of dissolution is realized through the occurrence of a huge counter-event, crisis, and then collapse. As a result of the implementation of this scenario there will be the destruction of the social system. The dialectical contradiction between the state and the civil society, without establishing effective interaction of subjects of state administration and civil society institutions, constitutes a threat of establishment of a neo-feudal regime and the ochlocracy regime. Thus, the main achievement of the author is the analysis of external, internal, inertial, unstable and collapse scenario in Ukraine in the dialectic of the internal and external, obsolete and new, civil society and state. The implementation of an optimal scenario for Ukraine requires coordinated interaction of subjects of social events. ; Статья посвящена решению актуальных вопросов поиска путей развития украинского общества. Для этого в соответствии с поставленной целью исследуются событийные сценарии развития Украины на этапе ее трансформации. Достижением автора является анализ экстернального, интернального, инерционного, нестабильного и сценария распада в Украине в диалектике внутреннего-внешнего, отжившего и нового, гражданского общества и государства. Реализация оптимального для Украины сценария развития требует согласованного взаимодействия субъектов социальных событий. ; Стаття присвячена вирішенню актуального завдання пошуку шляхів розвитку українського суспільства. Задля цього відповідно до поставленої мети досліджуються подієві сценарії розвитку України на етапі її трансформації. Здобутком автора є аналіз екстернального, інтернального, інерційного, нестабільного та сценарію розпаду в Україні у діалектиці внутрішнього-зовнішнього, віджилого та нового, громадянського суспільства і держави. Реалізація оптимального для України сценарію розвитку потребує узгодженої взаємодії суб'єктів соціальних подій.
