Suchergebnisse

I argue that two historicities have predominated in the relation between philosophical and historical discourses in the 20th century. One is the historicity of historians, engendered by the birth of the humanities. The other is a philosophical historicity in which the humanist myth persists, especially within the debate opposing structure and difference. This second historicity represents an elimination of the first, as it elaborates many more demands of historicity inherent to the structural model.

No âmbito da história pública, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar discursos e imagens produzidas por Estanislau Schaette, Hermann Schiefelbein, Arthur Wischral e Hugo Hegenberg acerca da identidade teuto-brasileira e seu impacto sobre a sociedade paranaense na primeira metade do século XX. Pinturas, fotografias e narrativas são entendidas como expressões racionais e sensíveis que transmitem e conservam valores através de lugares de memória pública. O estudo destas linguagens artísticas, fotográficas e literárias culminou com um projeto de interação/intervenção com o público, que visa difundir e refletir tais conteúdos e, em outro momento, junto com as comunidades, produzir material audiovisual (curta-metragem).

The philosophy of the 19th century marked the replacement of a rational and autonomous subject for a social one. This transition can be referred to as a "crises of foundations", a term coined in the 20th century, and can be found in the works of thinkers like Dilthey, Nietzsche and Marx. In legitimizing discourses of ethics and justice, this change has highlighted a relativistic perspective. This article examines how contemporary thought has assimmilated concepts of the Universal Moral and the supposed end of the Enlightenment Project so that human subjets can be perceived nowadays as historical and social beings instead of universal ones. Therefore, our intention is not to propose a new reasoning model but analyze the most dramatic consequences of an extreme relativism whose prerrogative is the uncommensurability of moral values.