Cruelty and total war: political-philosophical preconditions of the dissociation mentality
In: On cruelty, S. 231-252
"As early as in the mid-1930s, the world went towards eliminating the foundations of the classical doctrine of ius ad bellum and enforcing legal norms to restrain the violence of war. However, at the same time the world experiences the release of unbounded violence, epitomized by the rise of total war in the 20th century. Total war does not know any difference between combatants and non-combatants. Atrocities and war crimes are not just rare exceptions. How was it possible that in the modern age we are confronted with such an irreconcilable opposition between the morals and norms of war and the practice of war? The article will deal with this question by way of reconstructing essential elements of the discursive conditions of the 'dissociation mentality' (Bernd Hüppauf). This way of asking assumes that discourses on war, that is organized knowledge structures gained from texts, myths, images and collective symbols dealing with the experience of violence in the context of war, considerably influence the views, mentalities, moral orientations and behaviour of humans. In the article, the analysis will be restricted to one certain discourse which developed in Germany in the interwar period. The thesis is that the 'discourse of martial society' must be counted among the institutional preconditions of unbounded violence in World War II, because it was systematically severing the commitment to civilized norms. The discourse comprised a fundamental criticism of those barriers to violence as gained by civilization, which becomes particularly obvious by a criticism of the political philosophy of the Romantic period and Western civilization. It aimed at heroic individualization, the modernization of social structures according to military patterns and at total mobilization. And not the least, it led into an apology of violence." (author's abstract)