Suchergebnisse

from 2009, French intellectuals Alain Badiou and Alain Finkielkraut meet in various public scenes. This article is intended to show that, in view of the inclusion of this debate in these cultural bodies, the meeting between Badiou and Finkielkraut was unlikely. By providing a sociological explanation of the (sub) text of the explanation, the aim was to understand, from a comparative perspective, the structural, longitudinal and design dimensions underlying the manufacture of this co-product. The first part of that article sought, first of all, to establish, on the basis of a sociography of the respective routes of Badiou and Finkielkraut, that they share heterodox intellectual profiles associated with those same external careers of the cultural celebration. Secondly, we sought to show that the confrontatio set up following a radical ideological opposition offers them, above all, the opportunity to strengthen the prevalence within these channels of the intellectual reputation of this academic and mondal style, in a highly sophisticated way of combining those of anti-school with the effects of schools. This meeting between Badiou and Finkielkraut therefore condense on its own all the changes in the intellectual field since the late 1970s as a result of the emergence of these visibility circuits. First, it confirms the monopoly exercised by those cultural celebration networks in access to the public knowledge of intellectuals and, therefore, the bottom-up of the resources of the relational network over the autonomous species of cultural capital. On the other hand, editorial arrangements such as the explanation, by seeking to overcome ideological divisions, remain an example of the intellectual world's compliance with the journalistic methods of mediation and consensus. ; International audience Since 2009, the French intellectuals Alain Badiou and Alain Finkielkraut have been meeting on various public stages. This article proposes to show that, given the inclusion of this debate in these instances of cultural ...

In this article, Mr Finkielkraut describes how he has learned Europe through the countries of Central Europe, relying on his personal experience. By evoking some practical examples, we draw our attention to the fact that we focus more than anything else on the future of Europe, the enlargement of the European Union, and do not pay sufficient attention to Europe's heritage. ; V tomto článku A. Finkielkraut popisuje, jak poznal Evropu skrze státy střední Evropy a opírá se při tom o svoji osobní zkušenost. Evokováním několika praktických příkladů nás upozorňuje na skutečnost, že se na více než na cokoliv jiného soustředíme na budoucnost Evropy, tedy rozšiřování Evropské unie, a nevěnujeme dostatečnou pozornost evropskému dědictví. ; In this article, Mr Finkielkraut describes how he has learned Europe through the countries of Central Europe, relying on his personal experience. By evoking some practical examples, we draw our attention to the fact that we focus more than anything else on the future of Europe, the enlargement of the European Union, and do not pay sufficient attention to Europe's heritage. ; International audience