Soviet agricultural legislation
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 11, S. 440-446
ISSN: 0037-6795
3913 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 11, S. 440-446
ISSN: 0037-6795
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 10, S. 201-213
ISSN: 0037-6795
English edition, 1st-4th year. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued by the International Institute of Agriculture.
BASE
Mode of access: Internet. ; Digest for 1947- prepared by the Office's Division of Legislative Reports.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.319510029372211
Includes index. ; "January 1986." ; Shipping list no.: 86-138-P. ; "Database searched: AGRICOLA." ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
At head of title: Committee print; title from cover. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.$b654672
At head of title: 91st Congress, 1st session. Committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Description based on: 91st Congress, 1st session (Jan. 3-Dec. 23, 1969); title from cover. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Issued by the United States Dept. of Agriculture's Office of Budget and Finance -1972, by its Office of Management and Finance, 1973-1976, and by its Office of Budget, Planning and Evaluation, 1977.
BASE
In: Agricultural economic report 411
Animal rights movements continue to be a threat to the livestock industry in the United States. In 2008 California voters passed a proposition (2) which outlawed the use of battery cages for laying hens, gestation crates for sows, and veal crates for veal calves by 2015. Similar measures have previously been passed in Florida, Arizona, Colorado, and Oregon. As animal rights activists continue to pressure the livestock industry, it is important to look at their information outlets, especially those targeted toward young voters. The researchers used content analysis to determine the message content and campaign for Proposition 2 posted on YouTube. By using the search term "proposition 2 California," a usable sample of 103 videos were identified. Results indicate that when dealing with political legislation, agriculture has very little web presence on YouTube. In addition, it indicates that those in favor of the proposition use appeals and biased examples to deliver their message. In order to be relevant to young voters, agriculture advocates must begin using technology to reach non-agriculture audiences. Educators must also be preparing future communicators to embrace such technology in campaigns.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uva.x030515023
Issued Sept. 1978. ; Bibliography: p. 22. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 2
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112019494563
Cover title. ; Bibliography: p. 24. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015011489518
Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; "April 1984." ; At head of title: 98th Congress, 2d session. Committee print. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 84 S162-3 ; Includes bibliographies. ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015011489500
"December 1984." ; At head of title: 98th Congress, 2d session. Committee print. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 85 S162-1 ; Includes bibliographies. ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: Creighton Law Review, Band 46, Heft 4
SSRN
Working paper