Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
1951 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Halduskultuur: Administrative culture = Administrativnaja kul'tura
ISSN: 1736-6070
China Goes Global: The Partial Power
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 127-129
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 126-127
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
Peter J. Jacques: Environmental Skepticism – Ecology, Power and Public Life
In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Band 45, Heft 5, S. 1136-1140
Russian Energy Power and Foreign Relations: Implications for Conflict and Cooperation
In: Politologický časopis, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 425-429
ISSN: 1211-3247
Mezi anarchii a hierarchii: Republikansky koncept svetoveho radu a jeho neokonzervativni alternativa
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 73-82
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
A review essay on books by (1) Daniel H. Deudney, Bounding Power: Republican Security theory from the Polis to the Global Village, 1st edition (Princeton: Princeton U Press, 2006); & (2) Robert Kagan, Dangerous Nation: America's Place in the World from Its Earliest Days to the Dawn of the Twentieth Century, 1st edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006).
Teoretická východiska komparace modelů výkonu veřejné správy ; Theoretical basis of comparison of models of public administration
In connection to the process of the public administration reforms which take place in most of the European countries and also in connection to the "European administrative space", the issues of studying and mutually comparing administrative systems of various European countries, especially EU member countries, become more and more topical. They focus not only on purposeful and effective mutual use of experience in administrative systems improvements, but also on improving orientation in the already mentioned "European administrative space". There is nodue attention devoted so far to the systematic study of administrative systems of (other) European countries. Most of the publications which focus on this issue (mostly study books, study materials, or occassional articles) describe it only on a "descriptive" (mostly simplified) level. The cause of this lies in (apart from time and financial demands) significant complexity of the given issue, in terminological complications and in difficulties of getting adequate (essentially necessary) factography and in practically non-existing adequate methodology. Legal comparative jurisprudence and comparative studies of political systems might inspire onewhen developing the methodology. Even under the current situation, it would be efficient to pay more attention to the comparative studies of the structure of administrative systems, or to some selected areas of the public administration, for example to personnel systems in the public administration, financing public administration or administration of the public property. A thorough "stock -taking" of all the materials which have ever been published about this matter (even in different contexts) in our country orabroad might serve as a basis of these fragmented studies.
BASE
Vývoj správního rozdělení Čech v letach 1850-1868
In: Sborník Archivu Ministerstva Vnitra Republiky Československé 12
Bezpecnostni dilemma americke protiraketove obrany
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 27-50
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
The article deals with the former US President Bush's plan for the so-called third pillar of the American missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic in the context of American-Iranian and American-Russian relations. We assess the explanatory power of different but interconnected (neo)realist conceptualizations of security dilemma and deterrence. Specifically, the study evaluates the relative importance of classical security dilemma versus imperialist security dilemma and the explanatory power of three different modalities of deterrence. The paper further shows how Iran and Russia balanced the United States. We also argue that the American missile defense system was not primarily motivated by defensive realist worries about security, but rather by an offensive realist struggle for power and gains at the expense of others. Adapted from the source document.