Suchergebnisse

Problem setting. Since the creation of the United Nations, it has been 73 years since, the world has changed dramatically, and accordingly, the Organization must change, rebuild under new realities. Due to the increase in the number of international conflicts, global problems of our time, the intensification of world globalization, informatization and computerization of all spheres of society, old methods and ways of getting out of crisis situations either cease to work or become ineffective. Therefore, the way in which the United Nations is transformed will determine the state of affairs in the international arena, world peace and security.Recent research and publications analysis. In the sociology of international relations and related academic disciplines, the issue of UN activity and development was studied by such scholars as B.M. Ashavsky, M.P.O. Baccarini, M.O. Baimuratov, Z. Bauman, S. Browne, M.V. Buromensky, R. Butler, S. Chesterman, K. Engelbrekt, Y.P. Godovnik, R.V. Guban, J.M. Hanhimaki, D. Howell, I. Johnstone, D. Malone, P. Nadin, O.V. Serdyuk, B.I. Tarasyuk, N. Turchin, Yu.O. Voloshin, T.J. Weiss, I.V. Yakovuk, Y.M. Zhukovsky, A.M. Zlenko et al. The situation on the international scene is changing, and today the United Nations is faced with new challenges and challenges that have not been studied by the authors or have been studied fragmentarily, so the appeal to comprehend the possible models of reforming the UN in today's conditions is quite expedient.Paper objective ‑ identification of problems in the activities of the United Nations and its ability to perform the tasks set before the organization, as well as proposals to overcome the problems identified to ensure the effectiveness of the UN work.Paper main body. The UN structure is rather complex and includes a large number of different organizational units of committees, commissions, departments, etc. Main structural units the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), the International Court of Justice, Trusteeship Council (suspended on 1 November 1994), the Secretariat. From the point of view of the level of authority, the General Assembly and the UN Security Council are the most important.The beginning of the active reform process of the United Nations is linked to the election of Secretary-General Kofi Annan in 1997. During the 52nd session of the UN General Assembly, the main directions for updating the UN were proposed, including structural changes in the Secretariat, coordination of organizations of the UN system at the country level, and improving interaction with civil society. This topic was developed at the Millennium Summit in 2000 immediately after the 55th session of the UN General Assembly, which took place in September of the same year.Summing up the achievements of the United Nations during its existence, it is worth pointing out the process of its transformation from the organization, which was focused mainly on conference services, to a truly global provider of services, which operates in virtually every corner of the world, thereby helping to improve the lives of people in need of assistance. The following statistical information confirms the progress achieved: more than 70% of the annual budget is allocated to peacekeeping and other field operations, which is almost 20% more than in the mid-1990s; the number of humanitarian missions increased from 12 to 43; the number of human rights defenders of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in the states has increased by almost four times. However, there remain problems that have not yet been overcome, the most important of them is the reform of the Security Council. Discussions about reforming the UN Security Council have been taking place since the first years of its existence. The need for the reform of the UN Security Council is due to significant changes in the world that took place after the Second World War: economic, military-political, demographic, etc. The current composition of the UN Security Council does not proportionally represent the geographical zones of the conflict. Among the 15 members of the UN Security Council, 5 seats were assigned to the Western Europe and other Western European countries (including three permanent members), 2 to Eastern Europe (including Russia), 3 to the Asia-Pacific region (APR, including China), 3 to Africa and 2 ‑ Latin America and the Caribbean. These regional quotas show that one-third of the seats in the UN Security Council are in the «golden billion», while Eastern Europe, in which there are many unsettled conflicts, is represented only by Russia and one non-permanent member, and the Middle East is the source of the most severe conflicts, has only one representative from the APR group. In addition, the Asian quota can not always take into account the positions of States whose interests affect a number of territorial conflicts in the South China and East China Seas through which the main sea routes of the world pass.Conclusions of the research. There is a need for further UN reform. It is necessary to consistently carry out the reform of the UN Security Council, forming within its framework the agreed conceptual framework and practical measures to preserve and strengthen it as the central UN body, but the transformation is necessary: the world has changed, the structure that protects it must be changed. At the initial stage it is necessary to increase the number of members of the Council, the number of permanent members should reflect the regional picture of the world, new permanent members do not have veto power for 15-20 years. ; В статье исследуется деятельность ООН, ее институты и структура. Доказывается, что ООН нуждается в реформировании, прежде всего, ее главных структур: Генеральной Ассамблеи и Совета Безопасности, превращение их в эффективно работающие структуры. Кроме того требуют своего реформирования и совершенствования деятельность по поддержанию мира и разоружению, создание эффективной системы обеспечения прав человека, укрепление судебной системы, координация деятельности специализированных учреждений и специальных комиссий и фондов ООН, укрепление кадрового потенциала. ; У статті досліджується діяльність ООН, її інститути і структура. Доводиться, що ООН потребує реформування, насамперед, її головних структур: Генеральної Асамблеї і Ради Безпеки, перетворення їх в ефективно працюючу структуру. Крім того вимагають свого реформування та вдосконалення діяльність з підтримки миру і роззброєння, створення ефективної системи забезпечення прав людини, зміцнення судової системи, координація діяльності спеціалізованих установ та спеціальних комісій і фондів ООН, зміцнення кадрового потенціалу.

Problem setting. Since the creation of the United Nations, it has been 73 years since, the world has changed dramatically, and accordingly, the Organization must change, rebuild under new realities. Due to the increase in the number of international conflicts, global problems of our time, the intensification of world globalization, informatization and computerization of all spheres of society, old methods and ways of getting out of crisis situations either cease to work or become ineffective. Therefore, the way in which the United Nations is transformed will determine the state of affairs in the international arena, world peace and security.Recent research and publications analysis. In the sociology of international relations and related academic disciplines, the issue of UN activity and development was studied by such scholars as B.M. Ashavsky, M.P.O. Baccarini, M.O. Baimuratov, Z. Bauman, S. Browne, M.V. Buromensky, R. Butler, S. Chesterman, K. Engelbrekt, Y.P. Godovnik, R.V. Guban, J.M. Hanhimaki, D. Howell, I. Johnstone, D. Malone, P. Nadin, O.V. Serdyuk, B.I. Tarasyuk, N. Turchin, Yu.O. Voloshin, T.J. Weiss, I.V. Yakovuk, Y.M. Zhukovsky, A.M. Zlenko et al. The situation on the international scene is changing, and today the United Nations is faced with new challenges and challenges that have not been studied by the authors or have been studied fragmentarily, so the appeal to comprehend the possible models of reforming the UN in today's conditions is quite expedient.Paper objective ‑ identification of problems in the activities of the United Nations and its ability to perform the tasks set before the organization, as well as proposals to overcome the problems identified to ensure the effectiveness of the UN work.Paper main body. The UN structure is rather complex and includes a large number of different organizational units of committees, commissions, departments, etc. Main structural units the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), the International Court of Justice, Trusteeship Council (suspended on 1 November 1994), the Secretariat. From the point of view of the level of authority, the General Assembly and the UN Security Council are the most important.The beginning of the active reform process of the United Nations is linked to the election of Secretary-General Kofi Annan in 1997. During the 52nd session of the UN General Assembly, the main directions for updating the UN were proposed, including structural changes in the Secretariat, coordination of organizations of the UN system at the country level, and improving interaction with civil society. This topic was developed at the Millennium Summit in 2000 immediately after the 55th session of the UN General Assembly, which took place in September of the same year.Summing up the achievements of the United Nations during its existence, it is worth pointing out the process of its transformation from the organization, which was focused mainly on conference services, to a truly global provider of services, which operates in virtually every corner of the world, thereby helping to improve the lives of people in need of assistance. The following statistical information confirms the progress achieved: more than 70% of the annual budget is allocated to peacekeeping and other field operations, which is almost 20% more than in the mid-1990s; the number of humanitarian missions increased from 12 to 43; the number of human rights defenders of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in the states has increased by almost four times. However, there remain problems that have not yet been overcome, the most important of them is the reform of the Security Council. Discussions about reforming the UN Security Council have been taking place since the first years of its existence. The need for the reform of the UN Security Council is due to significant changes in the world that took place after the Second World War: economic, military-political, demographic, etc. The current composition of the UN Security Council does not proportionally represent the geographical zones of the conflict. Among the 15 members of the UN Security Council, 5 seats were assigned to the Western Europe and other Western European countries (including three permanent members), 2 to Eastern Europe (including Russia), 3 to the Asia-Pacific region (APR, including China), 3 to Africa and 2 ‑ Latin America and the Caribbean. These regional quotas show that one-third of the seats in the UN Security Council are in the «golden billion», while Eastern Europe, in which there are many unsettled conflicts, is represented only by Russia and one non-permanent member, and the Middle East is the source of the most severe conflicts, has only one representative from the APR group. In addition, the Asian quota can not always take into account the positions of States whose interests affect a number of territorial conflicts in the South China and East China Seas through which the main sea routes of the world pass.Conclusions of the research. There is a need for further UN reform. It is necessary to consistently carry out the reform of the UN Security Council, forming within its framework the agreed conceptual framework and practical measures to preserve and strengthen it as the central UN body, but the transformation is necessary: the world has changed, the structure that protects it must be changed. At the initial stage it is necessary to increase the number of members of the Council, the number of permanent members should reflect the regional picture of the world, new permanent members do not have veto power for 15-20 years. ; В статье исследуется деятельность ООН, ее институты и структура. Доказывается, что ООН нуждается в реформировании, прежде всего, ее главных структур: Генеральной Ассамблеи и Совета Безопасности, превращение их в эффективно работающие структуры. Кроме того требуют своего реформирования и совершенствования деятельность по поддержанию мира и разоружению, создание эффективной системы обеспечения прав человека, укрепление судебной системы, координация деятельности специализированных учреждений и специальных комиссий и фондов ООН, укрепление кадрового потенциала. ; У статті досліджується діяльність ООН, її інститути і структура. Доводиться, що ООН потребує реформування, насамперед, її головних структур: Генеральної Асамблеї і Ради Безпеки, перетворення їх в ефективно працюючу структуру. Крім того вимагають свого реформування та вдосконалення діяльність з підтримки миру і роззброєння, створення ефективної системи забезпечення прав людини, зміцнення судової системи, координація діяльності спеціалізованих установ та спеціальних комісій і фондів ООН, зміцнення кадрового потенціалу.

Transformative strategies for the development of higher education, pointed out in the list of key educational competencies of the 21st century by international organizations of various levels, are associated with the processes of becoming and transformation of individuals as integral subjects of cognition and action within the framework of communicative strategies for the formation of a global civil society. The implementation of transformative educational strategies in a meaningful aspect requires inter- and transdisciplinary methodologies to research the process of transformative adult learning aimed at developing an "integral person", and not just its rational-cognitive aspects. Within this holistic approach, questions arise about the nature of the transformative changes in the basic ontological and anthropological components of the educational process in the context of the transition epoch, namely, the becoming a global transcultural civil society. In order to clarify the features of such transformations, the dynamics of the phenomena and concepts of identity and self is examined in terms of a change in the conceptual landscape of culture. Various disciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches to their definition are analyzed. The relevance of the concepts of multiple identity (as an open permanent identification process) and the transversal self (as a process-dialogue unity of differences) in the liminal space at the global and individual levels are substantiated. ; Трансформативні стратегії розвитку вищої освіти, артикульовані в переліку ключових освітніх компетентностей ХХІ століття міжнародними організаціями різного рівня, пов'язані з процесами становлення і трансформації індивідів як цілісних суб'єктів пізнання і дії в межах комунікативних стратегій формування глобального громадянського суспільства. Реалізація трансформативних стратегій вищої освіти в змістовному аспекті вимагає інтер- і трансдисциплінарних методологій дослідження процесу трансформативного навчання дорослих, спрямованого на розвиток «цілісної людини», а не тільки його раціонально-когнітивних складових. В рамках такого холістичного підходу постають питання про природу трансформативних змін основних онто-антропологічних складових освітнього процесу в контексті епохи переходу, а саме становлення глобального транскультурного громадянського суспільства. З метою прояснення особливостей таких трансформацій розглядається динаміка феноменів і концептів ідентичності і самості на тлі зміни концептуального ландшафту культури. Аналізуються різні дисциплінарні і трансдисциплінарні підходи до їх визначення і обґрунтовується релевантність концептів множинної ідентичності як відкритого перманентного процесу ідентифікації та трансверсальної самості як процесуально-діалогової єдності відмінностей у просторі лімінальності на глобальному та індивідуальному рівнях. ПОСИЛАННЯ Бауман,З. (2002). Индивидуализированное общество. Пер. с англ. под ред. В.Л.Иноземцева. – М.: Логос. Бейтсон, Г. (2000). Экология разума. Избранные статьи по антропологии, психиатрии и эпистемологии (Пер. с англ.). М.: Смысл, 2000. Боас Ф. (2011). Ум первобытного человека. Академия фундаментальных исследований: этнология. Красанд, 2011. Взято з http://www.opentextnn.ru/man/?id=3337 Гердер И.Г. (1977). Идеи к философии истории человечества. Пер. и примеч. А.В.Михайлова. М., 1977. Горбунова Л. (2014). Транскультурна освітня стратегія в контексті викликів глобалізації. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education,1 (14), 158-198. Взято з www.philosopheducation.com Иглтон Т. (2012). Идея культуры. Пер с англ. И. Кушнаревой. М.: Изд. Дом Высшей школы экономики. Кастельс М. (2000). Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура: Пер. с англ. Под науч. ред. О.И.Шкаратана. М.: ГУ ВШЭ. Лиотар Жан-Франсуа (1998 ). Состояние постмодерна. Перевод с французского Н.А.Шматко. М.: Изд-во «Алетейя», Санкт-Петербург. Малиновский Б. (1998). Магия, наука и религия. Пер.с англ. М.: «Рефл-бук». Мосс М. (2011). Об одной категории человеческого духа: понятие личности, понятие «я». Мосс М. Общества. Обмен. Личность. Труды по социальной антропологии. Пер. с фр. М.: КДУ. 325-352. Тайлор Э.Б. (1989). Первобытная культура. М., 1989. Фуко М. (1977). Слова и вещи: археология гуманитарных наук. Перевод с французского. М.: «Прогресс». Эриксон Э. (1996). Детство и общество. Изд-е 2-е, перераб. и доп. Пер. с англ. СПб: Ленато, АСТ «Университетская книга». Юнг, К.Г. (2003). Воспоминания, мечты, размышления. Мн.: «Харвест». Взято з lib.ru/PSIHO/JUNG/memdreamrefs.txt Appadurai, A. (Ed). (2001). Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press. Взято з http://www.worldcat.org/title/globalization/oclc/177124342 Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond 'identity'. Theory and Society, 29,1-47.URL: https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/./brubaker/./18_Beyond_Ident. Cohen, A. P. (Ed.) (2000). Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values. London: Routledge. Взято з www.academia.edu/./Anthony_P._Cohen_Signifying_Ident. Ewing, K. P.(1990). The Illusion of Wholeness: Culture, Self, and the Experience of Inconsistency. Ethos,18(3), 251-78. Взято з http://www.academia.edu/2081742/The_illusion_of_wholeness_Culture_self_and_the_experience_of_inconsistency Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Взято з https://www.google.com.ua/search?q=Festinger,+L.+(1957)+A+theory+of+cognitive+dissonance Geertz, C. (1983). 'From the native's point of view': On the nature of anthropological understanding. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. 55-70. New York: Basic Books. Взято з hypergeertz.jku.at/GeertzTexts/Natives_Point.htm Hall, S. (2016). Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History. In:Stuart Hall: Selected Writings. Duke University Press. Взято з https://www.dukeupress.edu/cultural-studies-1983 Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society.American Psychologist, 53(10), 1111-1120. Взято з http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1111 Hermans, H. J. M., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology. 11(1). 31-61. Взято з https://www.taosinstitute.net/./hermans___dimaggio__in_re. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Взято з www.pseudology.org/Psyhology/CultureCriticalReview1952a.pdf Kusserow, A. S. (1999). Crossing the great divide: Anthropological theories of the western self. Journal of Anthropological Research. 55. 541-562. Взятол з www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10./jar.55.4.3631614 Land R., Rattray J., Vivian P. (2014). A Closer Look at Liminality: Incorrigibles and Threshold Capital. In: Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice. Proceedings of the National Academy's Sixth Annual Conference and the Fourth Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference. National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning. Взято з http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/73147/EPub_2012Proceedings.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y Lasch, C. (1984). The Minimal Self: Psychic Survival in Troubled Times, London: Pan Books. 1984. Взято з https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/724189.The_Minimal_Self Lewis, J. (2002). From Culturalism to Transculturalism. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 1 (Spring). Взято з http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=ijcs Morris, B. (1994). Anthropology of the self: The individual in cultural perspective. London: Pluto Press. Взято з https://www.amazon.com/Anthropology-Self-Individual-Cultural-Perspective/dp/0745308589 Quinn, N. (2006). The self. Anthropological Theory. 6(3). 362-384. взято з http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1463499606066893 Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. L., P. XXIX. взято з https://janeaustensummer.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/culture_and_imperialism.pdf Van Meijl, T. (2007). Beyond economics: Transnational labour migration in Asia and the Pacific. International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter, No. 43, 17. Взято з ijds.lemoyne.edu/journal/3_1/./IJDS.3.1.13.VanMeijl.pdf Van Meijl, T. (2008). Culture and Identity in Anthropology: Reflections on 'Unity' and 'Uncertainty' in the Dialogical Self. International Journal for Dialogical Science. Fall, 2008, Vol. 3, No. 1, 165-190. Взято з ijds.lemoyne.edu/journal/3_1/pdf/IJDS.3.1.13.VanMeijl.pdf Wolf, E. R.(1982). Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press. Взято з https://is.muni.cz/el/1490/jaro2015/CZS13/um/lecture1/1_4_Wolf.pdf Wright, S. (1998). The Politicization of 'Culture'. Anthropology Today,14(1), 7-15. Взято з https://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/22927858/./wright+1998.pdf Young, M. (2004). Malinowski: Odyssey of an anthropologist,1884-1920. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Взято з https://books.google.com.ua/books?isbn=1137354976

The article deals with the most important factors which shape challenges for educational policy and directions of its reformation in transnational educational space. In context of global society formation educational policies of developed countries demonstrates experiences of development and implementation of transversal (transferable, transcultural) competencies as key competencies of the 21st century in order to generate collective nous, peace, social justice and sustainable economic development. As one of the main goals of key competencies development considered promotion lifelong learning; It emphasizes the need for situational, contextualize, projective teaching and constructivist approaches. Particular attention is paid to analysis of key competencies in the trans-European educational space, of transferable competencies as US educational strategy and transversal competencies as the strategies proposed by UNESCO. ; В статті розглядаються найбільш значимі фактори, що формують виклики для освітньої політики, та напрями її реформування у транснаціональному освітньому просторі. В контексті становлення глобального суспільства з метою генерування колективного розуму, досягнення миру, соціальної справедливості і стійкого економічного розвитку освітня політика розвинених країн демонструє досвід розвитку та імплементації трансверсальних (трансферабельних, транскультурних) компетенцій як ключових для 21 століття. Як одна із цілей розвитку ключових компетенцій розглядається сприяння безперервному навчанню; підкреслюється необхідність ситуативного, контекстуалізованого, проективного навчання та конструктивістських підходів. Особлива увага приділяється аналізу ключових компетенцій в транс-європейському освітньому просторі, трансферабельних компетенцій як освітньої стратегії США та трансверсальних компетенцій як стратегій, запропонованих ЮНЕСКО. Вольфганг В. (2004). Наш постмодерний модерн. Переклад з нім. А.Л.Богачова, М.Д.Култаєвої, Л.А.Ситніченко. К.: Альтерпрес. Горбунова Л.(2007). Складне мислення як відповідь на виклик епохи. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1 (6), 40-55. Горбунова Л. (2008). Номадизм як спосіб мислення та освітня стратегія. Стаття І. Онтологічні засади номадичного мислення. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1-2 (7), 45-60. Горбунова Л. (2010). Номадизм як спосіб мислення та освітня стратегія. Стаття ІІ. Концепти та метафори. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1-2 (9), 103-114. Горбунова Л. (2011). Номадизм як спосіб мислення та освітня стратегія. Стаття ІІІ. Епістемологічна позиція. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1-2 (10), 17-34. Горбунова Л. (2012). Мислення у світі плюральності: проект трансверсального розуму В Вельша. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1-2 (11), 92-110. Горбунова Л. (2013). Феномен навчання у світлі комунікативної філософії Ю. Габермаса. Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 1 (12), 88-118. Горбунова Л. (2013). Теорія трансформативного навчання: освіта для дорослих в умовах «плинної сучасності». Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education, 2 (13), 66-114. Allan, J. (2011). Responsibly Competent: teaching, ethics and diversity. Policy Futures in Education, 9(1), 130-137. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Pscyhology, 52, 1–26. Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258. Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The challenge of problem-based learning. London: Kogan Page. Bransford, J. D. & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100. Dabrowski, M. & Wisniewski, J. (2011). Translating Key Competences into the School Curriculum: lessons from the Polish experience. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 323-334. Delors, J. (ed.)(1996). Learning – The Treasure within. Paris: UNESCO. Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of selfcontrol measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century (2012). Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, J.W. Pellegrino and M.L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington , THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS, Printed in the United States of America. URL:www.nap.edu/catalog/13398/education-for-life-and-work-developing-transferable-knowledge-and-skills Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. URL: https://www.amazon.com/Frames-Mind-Theory-Multiple-Intelligences/dp/0465024335 Goode, J. & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring Computer Science: A Case Study of School Reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(2), 12:1-12:16 Gordon,J.,Halasz,G., Krawczyk,M., Leney,T., Michel,A., Pepper,D., Putkiewicz,E., Wiśniewski, J. (Project Coordinator) (2009). Key competences in Europe: opening doors for lifelong learner across the school curriculum and teacher education. Center for Social and Economic Research. CASE Network Reports, 87, Warsaw. Gordon, J., Rey, O., Siewiorek, A., Vivitsou, M., & von Reis Saari, J. (2012). KeyCoNet. Literature Review: Key competence development in school education in Europe. URL:http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/olivier.rey/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/KeyCoNet-Literature-Review-on-Key-competence-development-in-school-education-in-Europe_11.pdf Granados, J. (2011).The Challenges of Higher Education in the 21st Century, GUNi Newsletter 5/11. URL:http://www.guni-rmies.net/news/detail.php?id=1725 Gwang-Jo Kim (2015). Regional Study on Transversal Competencies In Education Policy And Practice. Asia-Pacific Education Research Institutes Network (ERI-Net). Published by UNESCO. URL:http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002319/231907E.pdf Harvard University Competency Dictionary (2011). URL:https://ulupandanstars.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/harvard4competences.pdf (http://www.guni-rmies.net/news/detail.php?id=1725 Hoskins, B. and Deakin Crick, R. (2010). Learning to learn and civic competence to sides of the same coin? European Journal of Education Research, Vol. 45, 1, 121–137. Innerarity D. (2010). Uncertainty and creativity. Educating for the knowledge society. URL:http://www.debats.cat/en/debates/uncertainty-and-creativity-educating-knowledge-society Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Tech. rep., The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. URL: https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. URL: http://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1717435 Lawn, M. & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education - governing a new policy space. Oxford: UK, Symposium Books. Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 1–19. Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149–164. New Skills for New Jobs (2010). Action Now. A report by the Expert Group on New Skills for New Jobs prepared for the European Commission. URL:file:///C:/Users/Admin/Downloads/New_Skills_150dpi_100125.pdf Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary (DeSeCo) (2005). Organization for Economic and Co-operative Development. URL:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf. OJEU (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (OJEU L 394 of 30.12.2006) Pepper, D. (2011). Assessing Key Competences across the Curriculum and Europe. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 335-354. Ravitz, J., Hixson, N., English, M., & Mergendoller, J. (2012). Using project based learning to teach 21st century skills: Findings from a statewide initiative. Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, BC. April 16. Rychen, S. & Salganick, L. (2003) A holistic model of competence. In: Rychen, S. & Salagnick, L. (Eds.) Key competencies for a successful life and a wellfunctioning society. Gottingen, Hogrefe & Huber, 41-62. Schrag, C.O. (1989). Rationality between modernity and postmodernity. In: S.K. White (ed). Life-World and Politics: between modernity and postmodernity: Essays in Honor of Fred R. Dallmayr. Notre Dame, Indiana, 81–106. Schrag, C.O. (1997).The Self after Postmodernity. New Haven. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. NY: Cambridge University Press. Tiana, A., Moya, J. & Luengo, F. (2011). Implementing Key Competences in Basic. Education: reflections on curriculum design and development in Spain. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 307-322. Varis T., (2011). Towards global education: The need for the 21st century literacies. Finland World Universities Forum from 14-16 January, at the Hong Kong Institute of Education. URL: http://gu.friends-partners.org/Global_University/Global%20University%20System/List%20Distributions/2011/MTI2215_20110108/T.Varis%20Hong%20Kong%202011.pdf Wagner, T. (2010). The Global Achievement Gap. NY: Basoc Books. Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: the making of young people who will change the world. NY: Scribner. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of Competence: a conceptual clarification. In: D.S. Rychen& L.H. Salganik (Eds). Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. Seattle: Hogrefe& Huber. Welsch, W. (1998). Philosophy: specific origin and universal aspirations (traditional, modern, future). Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, Roundtable "Internationalism in Philosophy", 10-16 August 10th. URL: http://www2.uni-jena.de/welsch/papers/W_Welsch_Specific_Origin.html Welsch, W. (2003). Reason and Transition. On the Concept of Transversal Reason. URL: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/54/Welsch_Reason_and_Transition.htm?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 403. URL: https://web.stanford.edu/~roypea/RoyPDF%20folder/A160_Zahn_Pea_Hesse_Rosen_JLS_2010_inpress.pdf

Introduction of new forms of international cooperation, namely, electronic cross-border cooperation, is one of the priority directions of development of the world community. Electronic cross-border co-operation, including the use of cross-border trusted services, needs legislative regulation today. One of the locomotives of the international law-making process in the field of electronic trust services, electronic signatures is the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, the International Chamber of Commerce and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNCITRAL, Commission). UNCITRAL approved the Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the Model Law on Electronic Signatures with a Guide to Enactment 2001. These legal acts became the classic basis for the creation of normative and legal acts of almost all countries in the field of e-commerce and electronic signature, laid the general principles of cross-border recognition of certificates of electronic digital signature. Starting in 2014, the UNCITRAL Working Group IV on e-Commerce has taken steps to address legal issues related to the management of identity and trust services. UNCITRAL is considering the process of legal recognition of trust services and digital signatures as a requirement for identifying legal requirements and establishing relevant substantive law in any jurisdictional system.However, at the current stage of development of international and national law in the area of using trust services and digital signatures in the cross-border regime, a number of global problems remain unresolved. The problem of terminology. The problem lies in the fact that national laws or international laws contain a set of concepts and definitions that are significantly different and sometimes of an overly technical nature, which complicates the perception of ordinary citizens. The problem of credential as a component of a digital signature and trust services. As you know, the key components of a digital signature are subscriber data, which is considered as digital credentials. To date, no legislative act addresses the issues of cross-border recognition of digital credentials, namely: who should hold such recognition, which party they should be recognized as the purpose of such mutual recognition, which features should be available for mutual recognition, which restrictions may apply during mutual recognition. Also, outside the scope of legal regulation, there is currently a problem of the mutual recognition of identity data of legal entities, digital devices or digital objects. The problem of trust in electronic services and digital signatures. The possibility of introducing technical mechanisms for ensuring the reliability of trust services exists and can be implemented promptly. However, today there are no international legal mechanisms guaranteeing a certain level and standards of trust in digital services of one of the parties exchanging such services. In many national identification systems, including in Ukraine, so-called "levels of security of trust" are defined as in the European Union ("low", "high" and "basic"). While four levels of trust are used in the United States and in some other countries. The problem of cross-border interoperability. States with different legal culture traditionally diverge in the technical and legal assessment of digital signatures. Common Laws (United States, United Kingdom) do not impose specific technical and legal requirements for a digital signature, nor does it require the mandatory provision of a digital signature at the same time by all parties to the trust service or electronic document. In this case, an electronic signature may be created by anyone and by any technology. In Roman-Germanic legal systems (mainly in European countries), where the legal doctrine traditionally played an essential role, another concept of digital signature has developed. In order to address these issues, Working Group IV, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, the International Chamber of Commerce and the Economic Commission for Europe, with the participation of many countries of the world, are exploring the prospects for legal regulation of the recognition of cross-border trust services and digital signatures through the development of common, standardized international legal acts. In its activities, UNCITRAL plans to explore the experience of several projects in the field of electronic trust services: – European Commission, Regulation (EC) No. 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trusted services for electronic transactions within the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC; – The Eurasian Economic Union, the Eurasian Economic Union Treaty and the Concept for the use of services and legally significant electronic documents in inter-state information interaction; – Asia-Pacific Region, Pan-Asian Alliance for Electronic Commerce Development. Also, Working Group IV examines the existing international instruments aimed at ensuring the mutual recognition of transnational legal effects in the paper environment, such as the Convention, which abolishes the requirement for legalization of foreign official documents "Convention on Apostille" (The Hague, October 5, 1961) and the Protocol on the Uniform Order acting on behalf of the executing authority (Washington, February 17, 1940), which may include appropriate recommendations for minimum elements for the cross-border mutual recognition of UID and trust services. The issue of legal recognition of cross-border trust services has received sufficient attention from different countries. Thus, the Russian Federation proposed a project "Improving the Identity Management System in the Use of Cross-Border Confidence and Common Trust Infrastructure in the Application of Cross-Border Electronic Commerce Agreements". The project is based on the model defined in the Model Law "On Transborder Information Exchange of Electronic Documents" of November 25, 2016. According to the project, it is proposed to create a large cluster of vertically integrated "cross-border trust", which will have three levels of electronic trust services (basic, medium, high). The cluster can have a single international regulator, regulators of intergovernmental unions and national regulators of digital trust services and digital signatures. It is also envisaged to introduce legal levels of regulation of digital trusted services on one or many domain-based basis with the involvement of a third independent trust party, as well as the unification of international and national regulatory frameworks. Instead, the United States considers it necessary in the near future to consider the issue of legal recognition of identification information that has been authenticated in connection with a commercial transaction, namely, that it is a legal recognition of its purpose, requirements, legal support, etc. The proposals of Austria, Belgium, Italy, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the European Union concern the possibility of establishing agreed levels of security, which are provided through trust services: the first level – with the use of unskilled trust services. The second level with the use of qualified trusted services. The second level of legal consequences will include assimilation, presumption, transfer of the burden of proof to the opposing side, as well as the principle of mutual cross-border recognition for trusted services with the same level of security. Ukraine, as an active member of the global digitalization process, is taking some steps towards updating the legislation on digital signatures and trust services, namely the introduction of the new Law of Ukraine "On Electronic Trust Services". Ukraine, by amending existing legislation, adapts the regulatory framework in accordance with Regulation (EC) No910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trusted services for electronic transactions within the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EU. Today, there are many national and regional concepts and initiatives in the field of trust services, which have already been well developed. They can identify the relevant issues and can serve as a basis for developing an appropriate legal framework at the international level that could be transferred to various existing legal systems. The UNCITRAL Working Group IV on e-Commerce is implementing measures aimed at achieving the following objectives: – promotion of the development of international trade law and the satisfaction of the needs of economic actors in instruments that provide legal certainty for electronic transactions committed by them; – facilitating the harmonization of new legal aspects of projects, within which these issues are currently being resolved at the national or international level, to the more specific and functional content of the general requirements formulated in the current texts of UNCITRAL; – establishing a common legal framework for trust services and digital signatures, including relevant provisions aimed at developing international cross-border operational cooperation in the legal and technical fields. It is expedient for law-makers of Ukraine to take into account the world experience in developing normative legal acts regulating the sphere of trust services and digital signatures, including in the cross-border regime. ; В статье проанализирован законодательный опыт правового регулирования общественных отношений в сфере цифровой подписи и электронных доверительных услуг Комиссии ООН по международному торговому праву Международной торговой палаты и Европейской экономической комиссии UNCITRAL. Изучаются перспективы правового регулирования признания трансграничных доверительных услуг цифровых подписей путем разработки общих, стандартизированных международных правовых актов Рабочей группой IV Комиссии, а также при участии многих стран мира. На сегодня в ЮНСИТРАЛ формируется общее представление решения проблемы трансграничного признания иностранных цифровых подписей и электронных доверительных услуг на основе условия применения хотя бы одного из доктринальных толкований и наличия двух уровней безопасности. Изучено предложение Российской Федерации о введении проекта «Совершенствование системы управления идентификационными данными при использовании трансграничного пространства доверия и общей инфраструктуры доверия в применении к трансграничным электронным коммерческих сделкам». Изучены предложения Австрии, Бельгии, Италии, Соединенного Королевства Великобритании и Европейского Союза относительно возможности установления согласованных уровней безопасности, которые обеспечиваются с помощью доверительных услуг и уровней правовых последствий. Также рассмотрены предложения по применению принципов взаимного трансграничного признания для доверительных услуг, имеющих одинаковый уровень безопасности, и применению правового режима ответственности для квалифицированных поставщиков доверительных услуг. Осуществлен обзор проблемы трансграничного использования цифровых подписей и электронных доверительных услуг, присущих странам с разной юрисдикцией. Исследованы перспективные направления межгосударственного урегулирования сферы цифровых подписей и электронных доверительных услуг на основе примеров и предложений отдельных стран. ; У статті проаналізовано законодавчий досвід правового регулювання суспільних відносин у сфері цифрового підпису й електронних довірчих послуг Комісії ООН із міжнародного торговельного права Міжнародної торгової палати і Європейської економічної комісії UNCITRAL. Вивчаються перспективи правового регулювання визнання транскордонних довірчих послуг і цифрових підписів шляхом розроблення загальних, стандартизованих міжнародних правових актів Робочою групою IV Комісії, а також за участі багатьох країн світу. Сьогодні в ЮНСІТРАЛ формується загальне уявлення вирішення проблеми транскордонного визнання іноземних цифрових підписів та електронних довірчих послуг на основі умови застосування хоча б одного з доктринальних тлумачень і наявності двох рівнів безпеки. Опрацьовано пропозицію Російської Федерації щодо запровадження проекту «Вдосконалення системи управління ідентифікаційними даними під час використання транскордонного простору довіри й загальної інфраструктури довіри в застосуванні до транскордонних електронних комерційних угод». Вивчено пропозиції Австрії, Бельгії, Італії, Сполученого Королівства Великобританії та Європейського Союзу стосовно можливості встановлення узгоджених рівнів безпеки, які забезпечуються за допомогою довірчих послуг, і рівнів правових наслідків. Також розглянуто пропозиції щодо застосування принципів взаємного транскордонного визнання для довірчих послуг, що мають однаковий рівень безпеки, і застосування правового режиму відповідальності для кваліфікованих постачальників довірчих послуг. Узагальнено проблеми транскордонного використання цифрових підписів та електронних довірчих послуг, притаманні країнам із різною юрисдикцією. Досліджені перспективні напрями міждержавного врегулювання сфери цифрових підписів та електронних довірчих послуг на основі прикладів і пропозицій окремих країн.