Search results
Filter
Format
Type
Language
More Languages
Time Range
178574 results
Sort by:
SSRN
World Affairs Online
Environmental impact assessment in project appraisal in Britain
In: Project appraisal: ways, means and experiences, Volume 3, Issue 3, p. 133-141
Family Policy in Germany: Appraisal and Assessment
In: Journal of family history: studies in family, kinship and demography, Volume 33, Issue 4, p. 452-464
ISSN: 1552-5473
The German government spends about € 185 billion on measures to support families. This amount is above European Union average, but still, families have become smaller and the number of childless couples has increased. This article outlines some of the 145 German policy measures to support families and their purpose. An assessment that takes into account economic theory and empirical studies shows that an increase of monetary incentives could influence the decision to bear a child only moderately. This implies that policy measures alone cannot be held responsible for the entire difference in fertility rates between countries. Cited studies based on surveys among the German and French populations reveal how different attitudes of the population may also play their role in determining the fertility rate of a country.
Health impact assessment, integration and critical appraisal
In: Impact assessment and project appraisal, Volume 21, Issue 4, p. 313-321
ISSN: 1471-5465
Performance Appraisal Interviews: Preference Organization in Assessment Sequences
In: Journal of business communication: JBC, Volume 45, Issue 4, p. 408-429
ISSN: 1552-4582
Issues-oriented approach to social assessment and project appraisal
In: Project appraisal: ways, means and experiences, Volume 10, Issue 3, p. 142-154
A balanced appraisal? Impact Assessment of European Commission proposals
In: ELNI review, p. 2-8
Decision makers need to be informed about the likely consequences of projects, plans, policies and regulations. This principle has been embodied for many years in procedures like environmental impact assessment and risk assessment. More recently, theory and practice in the field of impact assessment have been influenced by three important trends (the need for a more strategic approach, 'better regulation' and more integrated forms of assessment), all of which are evident within (though not restricted to) the European Union. As these developments gain momentum, it is an opportune moment to reflect upon the purpose, practice and effectiveness of impact assessment. We have much to learn from the substantial achievements of well-established procedures such as EIA. But as new approaches, methodologies and guidelines proliferate we may be in danger of losing touch with the fundamentals. How, for example, should we conceptualise the role of impact assessment in policy- and decision-making? Questions like this one are relevant for assessment at all levels of governance, but they are explored here primarily with reference to integrated impact assessments of European Commission proposals (henceforth referred to as 'IA'). The paper sets out the policy background to this system, and considers the guidelines developed by the Commission for the conduct of such assessments. The paper then turns to experience with IA to date, particularly in relation to the questions identified above. It also proposes a set of principles, which should form a basis for impact assessment if it is to fulfil its role as an element of good governance.
Participative Performance Appraisal in Washington: An Assessment of Post-Implementation Receptivity
In: Public personnel management, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 153-171
ISSN: 1945-7421
Participative Performance Appraisal in Washington: An Assessment of Post-Implementation Receptivity
In: Public personnel management, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 153
ISSN: 0091-0260