Suchergebnisse

The possibility for establishing the Rule of Law in Bosnia-Herzegovina opened up considerably with the Dayton Accords in 1995. Ten years later, Bosnia-Herzegovina enters a new phase of its evolution after having undergone important changes in 2002, An understanding of the past decade of events will help to clarify the results of international aid given to the country and will help to show how Bosnia-Herzegovina can pursue full sovereignty, a condition that is essential to its entrance into the European Union.

Examines the unclear status of Bosnia-Herzegovina, not clearly defined as either a unitary or partitioned state in the 1995 Dayton agreements; conflict between existing laws and the present institutional structure. Summary in English.

Much scholarship on postwar Bosnia uses the Dayton Accords as a yardstick by which to measure the social & political transformations that have occurred over the past ten years. In so doing, such research remains trapped by the political vocabulary & agenda of the "international community," leaving outside the field of analysis such significant phenomena as the changes in social identities that grew out of the war or new clientelistic modes of allocating resources. Only by taking into account these complex factors can we understand the state of contemporary Bosnian society & the true impact of international action, & hence examine the conditions in which a shared political community in Bosnia-Herzegovina is emerging today. Adapted from the source document.

Compares European and Southeast Asian respective positions on the conflicts in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Pakistan; focus on ethnic and religious diversity, the Muslim issue, refugees, water problem, and reconstruction.

Examines the political, strategic, and operational difficulties of combining power and cooperative strategies, focusing on use of air strikes to maintain a UN safe area in Bosnia; 1990s. Summary in English.