Suchergebnisse

Cover -- CONTENTS -- Glossary -- SUMMARY OF MISSION OUTCOMES AND PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS -- DETAILED TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- A. Reconciliation Processes -- B. Compilation of Nonbudgetary Public Sector Units -- C. Classification Issues -- D. Officials Met During the Mission -- FIGURES -- 1. Illustration Step-by-Step Unravelling Annual Financial Statement into Entity Components -- 2. Step [A]-Verifying Net Income -- 3. Step [B]-Estimating Net Flows -- 4. Step [C]-Determine 'Other Economic Flows' and Unravelling Provisions -- 5. Step [D]-Allocating GFS Transactions, OEFs and Stocks -- 6. Step [E]-Finalizing GFS Framework, and Calculating NLB and Financing -- TABLES -- 1. Priority Recommendations -- 2. Adjustments on Revenue and Expense per GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 -- 3. Adjusting Provisions Recording to the GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 Methodology -- 4. Additional Recommendations -- 5. Comparison CONCEPT 'New' GFSM 2014 Framework Data and 'Old' HRT Data -- 6. Additional Recommendations -- 7. Illustration of Health Care Funding and Provision Flows Four Subsectors of the Economy -- 8. Generic Business Accounting Standards and GFS Recording Standards Compared (Treatment of Specific Concepts in the GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 Frameworks) -- APPENDIX -- I. Proposed Compilation Process for Extrabudgetary Units

This study of the education system of Bosnia and Herzegovina is part of the handbook "The education systems of Europe" which presents an analytical description of the education systems of all European countries, following common guidelines. The study begins with the historical and socio-cultural background of the educational system of Bosnia-Herzegovina which is followed by the description of the organizational and administrative context of the current education system. The next step is the functioning of the current education system, beginning with a structural overview and followed by an analysis of the different levels of the education system, including, as a separate chapter, post-secondary and tertiary education. The country study ends with an analysis of current problems and discussions, and opens perspectives for further development. A diagram illustrating the structural scheme of the educational system of Bosnia-Herzegovina is part of this article. (DIPF/Orig./Kie.).

KEY ISSUESStand-By Arrangement (SBA): The Board approved Bosnia and Herzegovina's (BiH)request for a two-year SBA with access of SDR 338.2 million (200 percent of quota) onSeptember 26, 2012. The fourth review was completed on October 28, 2013 andSDR 211.375 million (125 percent of quota) has been disbursed so far. SDR 42.275 million(25 percent of quota) would become available after completion of the fifth review.Program performance: Policy implementation remains strong despite a challengingenvironment. All end-September 2013 performance criteria (PCs) and indicative targetswere met. The fifth

Authors discuss the background to the Bosnian-Croatian conflict during the 1990s, including an overview of the genocide, the response of the international community & accountability for the perpetrators. The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Court of Justice, national courts as well as the continued presence of peacekeeping forces all contribute toward social, economic & psychic recovery. The roles of the European & American governments are severely criticized & policymaking during the conflict needs critical analysis. The conclusion examines the ambiguity that surrounds the precise definition of genocide & the two authors disagree on what constituted genocide in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Ongoing scrutiny of the conflict by the ICTY, including hearing testimony from survivors & expert witnesses continues to provide material for scholars of genocide. For the first time a body now exists to assess the character of a conflict on the basis of the legal definition of genocide. 15 References. S. de Haast

By combining comparative politics, conflict analysis and international relations theory Soeren Keil offers a unique analysis of federalism in post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina. By exploring this model of 'imposed federalism' not only does this study greatly contribute to the literature on developments in Bosnia and Herzegovina it also re-evaluates comparative federalism in theory and practice. This study also offers important conclusions for similar cases, both in the Western Balkans region and the wider world, where international involvement and federalism as a method of conflict resolution.