Suchergebnisse

Este texto apresenta uma discussão quanto à "centralidade da cultura" e sua importância nas problematizações cotidianas de grupos culturais na busca do reconhecimento de suas diferenças. Nesse sentido, pretendemos abordar a constituição da "essencialidade" de uma cultura surda com a tentativa de apresentarmos um deslocamento dessa "pureza cultural" para um território híbrido e de fronteira. Para a construção deste texto vamos nos valer de autores que se aproximam do campo dos estudos culturais e de uma perspectiva pós-estruturalista. Quando nos propomos a trabalhar a surdez a partir desta perspectiva, é necessário rompermos com a busca de uma "pureza cultural", da "essência cultural". Propomos um distanciamento da indagação: "o que é mesmo a cultura surda?" nos interessando, sim, pelas condições de possibilidade de diferentes nuances de culturas surdas. Procuramos trazer à discussão os discursos dos movimentos das comunidades surdas em favor do reconhecimento das suas diferenças e especificidades culturais, considerando importante problematizá-los e localizá-los em "territórios contestados", em que as culturas e as identidades não são fixas, mas sim móveis, fragmentadas e híbridas. Propomos pensar a problematização de uma identidade surda, de um essencialismo ou mesmo de uma autenticidade a ser definida, para então pensarmos em cenários onde os discursos da surdez são levados a cena, e onde à constituição de ser surdo deve ser entendido como uma contingência histórica e cultural.

Starting from Raul Prebisch's personal and intellectual trajectory, this paper provides a detailed analysis and a critical appraisal of his ultimate contribution on peripheric capitalism. In conclusion, it is intended to claim that his search for an alternative approach to Latin American capitalism has not succeeded in breaking up the boundaries of bourgeois political economy

Transdisciplinarity is based on different levels of reality, in theories of complexity and of the third included, and has strived to exceed the boundaries between disciplines, developing a tool that connects with complex knowledge systems. To be the reason Western the paradigm in which the sciences have developed, adjustments have been made over the last few centuries, while the misfit was tolerable. But in the last decades they clashes irreversibly of environmental culture and the stress has become tangible.

Science and arts, apparently, would be in opposite sides of the spectrum of the human knowledge. A closer look, however, reveals a relationship of more proximity than detachment. Photography is one of the areas that allows to point that the boundaries between this two fields of knowledge are less evident than we can imagine. That is discussion we make in this text, by analyzing the use of photography in the search of the expansion of the human knowledge about the Universe.

The article discusses how Judith Butler's theory of gender, mainly based on what the author called metaphysics of substance, operates a desontologization of sex-gender experiences. For this, it exposes how Butler operates the desontologization of the gendered subject, through her feminist critique of the idea of ​​subject conceived from the mark of sexual difference. Later, it dedicates to what Butler called the "metaphysics of substance", seen as what sustains, within the framework of the binary sex-gender system, the idea of ​​natural difference of bodies, a moment in which the author resorts to the genealogy of morals developed by Nietzsche to justify her genealogy of gender and bodies, seeing these as inseparable, which is why she concludes that, in the manner of gender, the production of bodies occurs in a performative way through contextualized recitations that establish the boundaries of human intelligibility and that, therefore, it is subject to transformation.

This article, of a philosophical nature, has as its object of study a critique of the representative and dogmatic model of thought made by the philosopher Gilles Deleuze. A bibliographic research has as theoretical horizon the philosophy of difference, focusing on the Deleuzian legacy. The author presents assumptions that created representative thinking in the form of postulates. There are eight postulates: Cogitatio Universalis (thinking naturally, the ideal of common sense, the model of recognition, the element of representation, the negative of error, the privilege of design, one of the solutions and the result saber. It is worth pointing out the contours of these postulates that show a dogmatic image of thought - a traitorous image of what it means to think. This model image has strong resonances in the contemporary educational universe. It is therefore a matter of effecting, in tune with Deleuze, a critique of the dogmatic images of thought and its boundaries that often deemphasize thought, the thought of education, and, by extension, life itself.