Business bullshit
Introduction -- Bullshit: a spotters guide -- Why is there so much bullshit? -- How to do things with bullshit -- Cutting the bullshit
154 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Introduction -- Bullshit: a spotters guide -- Why is there so much bullshit? -- How to do things with bullshit -- Cutting the bullshit
One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, ""we have no theo
In: Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft: zfm, Band 15, Heft 29-2, S. 136-142
ISSN: 2296-4126
In: Journal of critical realism, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 94-97
ISSN: 1572-5138
In: Political communication, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 476-480
ISSN: 1058-4609
In: Soundings: a journal of politics and culture, Heft 57, S. 82-94
ISSN: 1362-6620
In: Soundings: a journal of politics and culture, Band 57, Heft 57, S. 82-94
ISSN: 1741-0797
Blog: LSE IQ podcast
Contributor(s): Professor David Graeber | This episode is dedicated to David Graeber, LSE professor of Anthropology, who died unexpectedly in September this year. David was a public intellectual, a best-selling author, an influential activist and anarchist.
He took aim at the pointless bureaucracy of modern life, memorably coining the term 'bullshit jobs'. And his book 'Debt: The First 5000 years' was turned into a radio series by the BBC.
But David started his academic career studying Madagascar. Anthropology interested him, he said, because he was interested in human possibilities - including the potential of societies to organise themselves without the need for a state - as he had seen in his own research.
He was also a well-known anti-globalisation activist and a leading figure in the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
David was generous enough to do an interview for us in 2016 when LSE iQ was in its infancy. That episode asked, 'What's the future of work?' and in his interview he reflected on the disappointments of technology, pointless jobs and caring labour.
David was such an interesting speaker that we would have liked to use more of it at the time, but we didn't have the space. Now, it feels right to bring you a lightly edited version of the interview.
Contributors
David Graeber
Research
The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy, published by Melville House.
'On the Phenomenon of Bullshit jobs: A work rant', STRIKE! Magazine
Bullshit Jobs: A theory, published by Allen Lane
Blog: Verfassungsblog
On 15 December 2023, the Swiss Federal Council (Government) announced that it intended to start formal negotiations with the EU on the conclusion of a Framework Agreement (FA) 2.0. Five existing and two new treaties between the EU and Switzerland are to be subject to dynamic alignment and institutionalised, i.e. provided with a monitoring and judicial mechanism. The project, which is practically fixed in the decisive questions by a "Common Understanding" ("CU") between the two parties, is based on a triple B approach: in substance, it consists of unsuccessful bricolage, the foundations were laid by bullshit, and because elections and a change of the Commission are imminent in the EU, bustle is supposedly of the essence. The CU summarizes what the Parties have informally agreed on.
In: Journal of International Political Theory, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 219-223
ISSN: 1755-1722
In: Evans , A , Sleegers , W & Mlakar , Ž 2020 , ' Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit ' , Judgment and Decision Making , vol. 15 , no. 3 , pp. 401-412 .
Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, we develop a scale to measure scientific bullshit receptivity — the tendency to perceive truthfulness in nonsensical scientific statements. Across three studies (total N = 1,948), scientific bullshit receptivity was positively correlated with pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity. Both types of bullshit receptivity were positively correlated with belief in science, conservative political beliefs, and faith in intuition. However, compared to pseudoprofound bullshit receptivity, scientific bullshit receptivity was more strongly correlated with belief in science, and less strongly correlated with conservative political beliefs and faith in intuition. Finally, scientific literacy moderated the relationship the two types of bullshit receptivity; the correlation between the two types of receptivity was weaker for individuals scoring high in scientific literacy.
BASE
In: Social epistemology: a journal of knowledge, culture and policy, S. 1-12
ISSN: 1464-5297