Suchergebnisse

The article provides an analysis of the government measures taken to support the renewable energy industry in China. China has managed to create a new electricity market and become the world industry leader in just 15 years. This became possible through comprehensive government measures to support the renewable energy industry, large-scale investments and the implementation of the ambitious goals facing the Chinese government.

The article deals with the legislative bases and tasks of the organization of accounting in the People's Republic of China. ; В статье рассматриваются законодательные основы и задачи организации бухгалтерского учета в Китайской народной республике.

Over the past five years, Congress has achieved a great deal for U.S. national security in its debate of and legislation on China, but there is a risk of overshooting a well-reasoned policy response and generating costly escalation.

Verlängerung des Vertrags Russland – China (v. 28. Juni 2021): • Kommentar (dt.) zur gemeinsamen Erklärung Russland-China zur Vertragsverlängerung (2021) und zu Pressestimmen in Russland; • Meinungsbeitrag (dt., russ.) aus Russland zum Vertrag Russland-China (2021) und dessen Bedeutung für 'Global Governance'; • Dokumentation (dt., russ.) anlässlich der Vertragsverlängerung (28. Juni 2021): .- Protokoll zum Video-Gespräch der Präsidenten Russlands und Chinas; .- Gemeinsame Erklärung der RF und VR China zum 20. Jahrestag der Unterzeichnung des Vertrags.:• Vorwort von Rainer Böhme (Hrsg.) • Kommentar von Wilfried Schreiber: Russland-China-Vertrag – Gemeinsame Antwort auf die "regelbasierte Ordnung" des Westens (dt.); • Meinungsbeitrag von W. Pawlenko: Der Russland-China-Vertrag – eine neue Dimension in der globalen Politik. In: IA REGNUM, Moskau, 28. Juni 2021. (Übersetzung a. d. Russ. Von Rainer Böhme.) • Dokumentation (Übersetzung a. d. Russ. von Rainer Böhme): .- Protokoll zum Video-Gespräch der Präsidenten Russlands und Chinas am 28. Juni 2021 anlässlich der Vertragsverlängerung; .- Gemeinsame Erklärung (vom 28. Juni 2021) der Russischen Föderation und der Volksrepublik China zum 20. Jahrestag der Unterzeichnung des Vertrags über Nachbarschaft, Freundschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Russischen Föderation und der VR China. • Textoriginale (russ.): .- Meinungsbeitrag W. Pawlenko; • Dokumentation der Präsidialverwaltung der Russischen Föderation: .- Protokoll zum Video-Gespräch der Präsidenten Russlands und Chinas am 28. Juni 2021 anlässlich der Vertragsverlängerung. .- Gemeinsame Erklärung (vom 28. Juni 2021) der Russischen Föderation und der Volksrepublik China zum 20. Jahrestag der Unterzeichnung des Vertrags über Nachbarschaft, Freundschaft und Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Russischen Föderation und der VR China. (Offizieller russischer Wortlaut).

China, Russia, and the United States are the three most active geopolitical actors today. One central question is whether the three powers can replicate the American-Chinese-Soviet strategic triangle of the 1970s that refashioned the global geopolitical landscape. That earlier triangle emerged as a consequence of a U.S. policy decision to reestablish relations with China as part of a strategic design to enable the United States to exit the war in Vietnam "with honor," restrain the Soviet Union's burgeoning power, and stabilize East Asia. Through deft diplomacy, Washington advanced its goals, but the triangle endured for most of the 1970s because it also advanced Soviet and Chinese interests. Today, the return of great-power competition has sparked debate about the emergence of a new strategic triangle. One does not now exist, primarily because the United States is not interested in establishing a working link with Russia. Because Washington does not believe that Russia adds much to the challenge it faces from China alone, it is unwilling to do much to disrupt growing Russian-Chinese alignment. Whether a strategic triangle comes into being depends largely on Russia. It has to convince both Washington and Beijing that its policy choices can significantly shift the balance between the two now and in the future. Neither capital believes that now, largely because they doubt Moscow's ability to revitalize the economy to generate the resources it needs to back up its great-power ambitions in the long run.

The article comments on the concept of «socialism with Chinese specificity», which forms the ideological basis of the «Chinese miracle». The ideological origins of this concept, starting with Confucianism, are revealed. It has evolved to become increasingly pragmatic and to adapt to the realities of national and global development. The relation of this concept with the Marxist concept of socialism is shown. The article substantiates the fundamental theoretical thesis that in the objective-essential sense (in the elimination of, in particular, national specifics) Chinese society is a transitional form to socialism (a certain analogue of the Soviet society of the NEP period). The author talks about a «heterogeneous», «mixed» socio-economic system, the vector and nature of the future evolution of which will depend crucially on the strategic course of the CPC.