Migration to Towns and Cities
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 41-51
ISSN: 1537-5390
2527128 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 41-51
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Urban history, Band 4, S. 30-39
ISSN: 1469-8706
In: Identities: global studies in culture and power, S. 1-19
ISSN: 1547-3384
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 450-455
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 513, S. 194-195
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: Local government studies, Band 22, Heft 3
ISSN: 0300-3930
In: Local government studies, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 1-27
ISSN: 1743-9388
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 105-109
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 237-241
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: UN Chronicle, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 44-46
ISSN: 1564-3913
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 91, Heft 2, S. 454-460
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: State and local government review: a journal of research and viewpoints on state and local government issues, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 7-22
ISSN: 0160-323X
Examines the relationship between fiscal stress & municipal policy toward growth in WI cities, villages, & towns, drawing on data from two 1998 surveys. Cities & villages tended to exert greater growth management effort than did towns, as measured by policies adopted. Findings provide some support for the argument that cities & villages view growth differently than do towns, which see growth as largely beneficial. To the extent that growth leads to marginal increases in overall costs, cities & villages appear more willing & able than towns to exact influence through greater growth management effort. 3 Tables, 45 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Urban history, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 424-439
ISSN: 1469-8706
ABSTRACTAlthough little explored, regulations – in the form of laws and byelaws – formed an important technique of nineteenth-century government. This article explores the implementation and enforcement of two sets of regulations regarding the keeping and disposal of dirt imposed by Scottish local authorities: one on behaviours around the disposal of domestic refuse, the other on the keeping of dung – a form of property. While behaviours around refuse were more stringently policed than those affecting property, in both cases regulations were not the basis of a strict disciplinary regime, but a means of informing, educating and persuading residents into cleanly habits.
In: History workshop: a journal of socialist and feminist historians, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 249-250
ISSN: 1477-4569
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 69, S. 30-32
ISSN: 0041-5537