Reactions to Loss of Body Parts—Some Research Priorities in Rehabilitation
In: Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Band 62, Heft 5, S. 137-143
ISSN: 1559-1476
743 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Band 62, Heft 5, S. 137-143
ISSN: 1559-1476
In: International Geology Review, Band 6, Heft 8, S. 1483-1489
In: Journal of political economy, Band 80, Heft 5, S. 1023-1030
ISSN: 1537-534X
In: Economica, Band 36, Heft 143, S. 304
In: International Geology Review, Band 11, Heft 7, S. 787-802
In: The journal of developing areas, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 192-206
ISSN: 0022-037X
In: The economic history review, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 395
ISSN: 1468-0289
In: The annals of occupational hygiene: an international journal published for the British Occupational Hygiene Society
ISSN: 1475-3162
In: U.S. news & world report, S. 35-38
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: U.S. news & world report, S. 18-19
ISSN: 0041-5537
In: Social studies: a periodical for teachers and administrators, Band 63, Heft 5, S. 218-222
ISSN: 2152-405X
In: Economica, Band 38, Heft 150, S. 199
In: American political science review, Band 61, Heft 3, S. 694-700
ISSN: 1537-5943
Midterm congressional elections have been subjected to relatively little analysis. This is surprising because these elections exhibit three quite striking features which, when taken together, call for further explanation. First, every midterm House election since the Civil War, with the exception of 1934, has brought a net loss of seats to the President's party. Second, in the large majority of elections the net loss has approximated the gross loss. The in-party (i.e., the President's party) seldom has captured seats from the other party to offset its own loss. And third, although the in-party's loss has been persistent, the number of seats lost has varied widely.Attempts to incorporate midterm elections into a broader interpretive framework of American election studies usually stress one of the first two features outlined above. The fact that only the in-party loses—and that its losses are mainly in marginal districts—has led commentators such as V. O. Key Jr. and the authors of The American Voter to interpret these midterm elections as part of the stable, long-term trends in voters' party allegiance.
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 13, S. 19-34
ISSN: 0022-3816
Address before the Southern political science association, Durham, N.C., Nov. 17, 1950.
In: Human relations: towards the integration of the social sciences, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 487-496
ISSN: 1573-9716, 1741-282X