ON THE CO-OPERATIVE TRANSFORMATION OF AGRICULTURE
In: Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, S. 184-207
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, S. 184-207
In: Papers in Economics and Sociology, S. 443-456
In: Denmark: a Social Laboratory, S. 247-248
In: East-West Relations, S. 185-204
In: Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, S. 211-234
In: Monetary Integration in Western Europe, S. 174-199
In: Documents on the Holocaust, S. 50-51
In: Africa and International Organization, S. 31-48
In: Documents on the Holocaust, S. 291-291
In: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht; New Perspectives and Conceptions of International Law, S. 75-89
In: Documents on the Holocaust, S. 64-65
In: Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, S. 208-210
In: The Psychology and Physiology of Stress, S. 197-218
In: Historische Konjunktivforschung, S. 208-233
"German industrial expansion in the period 1880-1913 was significantly more rapid than that of the United Kingdom, and substantially less volatile than that of the United States. A partial explanation for the relatively stable growth path of the German economy during these years may be found in the greater relative importance and volatility of the railroad construction component of net investment in the United States. By 1880 only a little over one-third of the U.S. final rail net was in place, compared with over half in the case of Germany. Compared to Germany, railroad investment in the United States between 1880 and World War I was, on average, much larger absolutely. It was also much larger in comparison to total population, total industrial output, and in comparison to expenditures on residential construction. In addition, it was more volatile. The lesser importance and volatility of this component of autonomous expenditure in the German case partially accounts for the relative nonvolatility of the German industrial Output series." (author's abstract)
In: Soziologie in der Gesellschaft: Referate aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, der Ad-hoc-Gruppen und des Berufsverbandes Deutscher Soziologen beim 20. Deutschen Soziologentag in Bremen 1980, S. 226-232