Suchergebnisse

International audience ; French-language discourse in information and communication sciences often tends to mire itself in endless discussions of complexity, constructivism, and semiotics. One of the reasons why recent work is so interesting is precisely that it takes complexity as a categorical given and explores how it manifests itself in the territory. For example, the case of the Bastia port expansion project studied by Julien Angelini leads to the conclusion that public debate is how territorial intelligence emerges. In this case, the expression "territorial intelligence", as vague and polysemous as it may seem, also reveals power. It is the association of intelligence, in all its possible forms, with belonging to a territory, also in all its possible forms. Putting a territorial intelligence approach into practice usually means a comprehensive, qualitative, and factual study characterized by participant observation and mainly based on tangible traces of information production, as in the Bastia port expansion project. Another study on the participation of the citizens of Bordeaux in the micro-decisions involved in constructing a tramway system illustrates participatory democracy being put into practice as a communication tool in a territorial development project. This paper proposes to compare concepts from information and communication sciences with field studies in order to situate issues of territorial intelligence and the challenges they raise at the intersection of geography, anthropology, history, economy, sociology, and political science. All these fields deal with the classic set of issues from information and communication sciences: how to establish relationships and therefore trust, facilitate access to data, circulate information, communicate, and interact. ; Le discours francophone en sciences de l'information-communication se réfugie souvent dans la glose sur la complexité, le constructivisme ou la sémiotique. Un des intérêts des travaux récents est précisément d'être parti de la complexité ...

International audience ; French-language discourse in information and communication sciences often tends to mire itself in endless discussions of complexity, constructivism, and semiotics. One of the reasons why recent work is so interesting is precisely that it takes complexity as a categorical given and explores how it manifests itself in the territory. For example, the case of the Bastia port expansion project studied by Julien Angelini leads to the conclusion that public debate is how territorial intelligence emerges. In this case, the expression "territorial intelligence", as vague and polysemous as it may seem, also reveals power. It is the association of intelligence, in all its possible forms, with belonging to a territory, also in all its possible forms. Putting a territorial intelligence approach into practice usually means a comprehensive, qualitative, and factual study characterized by participant observation and mainly based on tangible traces of information production, as in the Bastia port expansion project. Another study on the participation of the citizens of Bordeaux in the micro-decisions involved in constructing a tramway system illustrates participatory democracy being put into practice as a communication tool in a territorial development project. This paper proposes to compare concepts from information and communication sciences with field studies in order to situate issues of territorial intelligence and the challenges they raise at the intersection of geography, anthropology, history, economy, sociology, and political science. All these fields deal with the classic set of issues from information and communication sciences: how to establish relationships and therefore trust, facilitate access to data, circulate information, communicate, and interact. ; Le discours francophone en sciences de l'information-communication se réfugie souvent dans la glose sur la complexité, le constructivisme ou la sémiotique. Un des intérêts des travaux récents est précisément d'être parti de la complexité ...

International audience ; French-language discourse in information and communication sciences often tends to mire itself in endless discussions of complexity, constructivism, and semiotics. One of the reasons why recent work is so interesting is precisely that it takes complexity as a categorical given and explores how it manifests itself in the territory. For example, the case of the Bastia port expansion project studied by Julien Angelini leads to the conclusion that public debate is how territorial intelligence emerges. In this case, the expression "territorial intelligence", as vague and polysemous as it may seem, also reveals power. It is the association of intelligence, in all its possible forms, with belonging to a territory, also in all its possible forms. Putting a territorial intelligence approach into practice usually means a comprehensive, qualitative, and factual study characterized by participant observation and mainly based on tangible traces of information production, as in the Bastia port expansion project. Another study on the participation of the citizens of Bordeaux in the micro-decisions involved in constructing a tramway system illustrates participatory democracy being put into practice as a communication tool in a territorial development project. This paper proposes to compare concepts from information and communication sciences with field studies in order to situate issues of territorial intelligence and the challenges they raise at the intersection of geography, anthropology, history, economy, sociology, and political science. All these fields deal with the classic set of issues from information and communication sciences: how to establish relationships and therefore trust, facilitate access to data, circulate information, communicate, and interact. ; Le discours francophone en sciences de l'information-communication se réfugie souvent dans la glose sur la complexité, le constructivisme ou la sémiotique. Un des intérêts des travaux récents est précisément d'être parti de la complexité ...

International audience ; French-language discourse in information and communication sciences often tends to mire itself in endless discussions of complexity, constructivism, and semiotics. One of the reasons why recent work is so interesting is precisely that it takes complexity as a categorical given and explores how it manifests itself in the territory. For example, the case of the Bastia port expansion project studied by Julien Angelini leads to the conclusion that public debate is how territorial intelligence emerges. In this case, the expression "territorial intelligence", as vague and polysemous as it may seem, also reveals power. It is the association of intelligence, in all its possible forms, with belonging to a territory, also in all its possible forms. Putting a territorial intelligence approach into practice usually means a comprehensive, qualitative, and factual study characterized by participant observation and mainly based on tangible traces of information production, as in the Bastia port expansion project. Another study on the participation of the citizens of Bordeaux in the micro-decisions involved in constructing a tramway system illustrates participatory democracy being put into practice as a communication tool in a territorial development project. This paper proposes to compare concepts from information and communication sciences with field studies in order to situate issues of territorial intelligence and the challenges they raise at the intersection of geography, anthropology, history, economy, sociology, and political science. All these fields deal with the classic set of issues from information and communication sciences: how to establish relationships and therefore trust, facilitate access to data, circulate information, communicate, and interact. ; Le discours francophone en sciences de l'information-communication se réfugie souvent dans la glose sur la complexité, le constructivisme ou la sémiotique. Un des intérêts des travaux récents est précisément d'être parti de la complexité ...

The article has two objectives. First, we establish a critical synthesis of the thesis of Jean-Leon Beauvois on the bonds between the medias, the propagandas and the democracy. The second objective is to explain some major contributions and prospects opened by Beauvois on this set of themes within social sciences and communication sciences. ; L'objectif de l'article est double. Il s'agit, d'abord, de dresser une synthèse critique de la thèse de Jean–Léon Beauvois sur les liens entre les médias, les propagandes et les rapports qu'ils entretiennent avec la démocratie. Le deuxième objectif est d'expliquer quelques apports majeurs et perspectives ouvertes par Beauvois sur cette thématique au sein des sciences sociales et des sciences de la communication.

International audience ; This text has two goals. First, to rely on the work of Louis Quéré, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of the two dominant models of two dominant models: an epistemological model enrolling the theory of information and cybernetics in an instrumental aim; a political model that aims at inter-understanding at the service of self-determination of the citizens in the elaboration of norms that govern them. Moreover, we wish to add to this review, two models which go beyond the limits of the first two approaches: a praxeological model that relies on praxis as an organizing activity of shared perspectives; a model of incommunication that reverses the situation and makes the impossibility of achieving intercomprehension the norm. ; Ce texte vise deux objectifs. Tout d'abord, s'appuyer sur les travaux de Louis Quéré pour révéler les forces et les faiblesses des deux modèles dominants : un modèle épistémologique s'inscrivant dans le sillage de la théorie de l'information et de la cybernétique dans une visée instrumentale ; un modèle politique qui vise l'intercompréhension au service de l'autodétermination des citoyens dans l'élaboration des normes qui les gouvernent. Par ailleurs, nous souhaitons ajouter à cette revue deux modèles qui permettent de dépasser les limites des deux premières approches : un modèle praxéologique qui s'appuie sur la praxis comme activité organisante de perspectives partagées ; un modèle de l'incommunication qui fait de l'impossibilité d'aboutir à l'intercompréhension la norme des relations sociales.

International audience ; This text has two goals. First, to rely on the work of Louis Quéré, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of the two dominant models of two dominant models: an epistemological model enrolling the theory of information and cybernetics in an instrumental aim; a political model that aims at inter-understanding at the service of self-determination of the citizens in the elaboration of norms that govern them. Moreover, we wish to add to this review, two models which go beyond the limits of the first two approaches: a praxeological model that relies on praxis as an organizing activity of shared perspectives; a model of incommunication that reverses the situation and makes the impossibility of achieving intercomprehension the norm. ; Ce texte vise deux objectifs. Tout d'abord, s'appuyer sur les travaux de Louis Quéré pour révéler les forces et les faiblesses des deux modèles dominants : un modèle épistémologique s'inscrivant dans le sillage de la théorie de l'information et de la cybernétique dans une visée instrumentale ; un modèle politique qui vise l'intercompréhension au service de l'autodétermination des citoyens dans l'élaboration des normes qui les gouvernent. Par ailleurs, nous souhaitons ajouter à cette revue deux modèles qui permettent de dépasser les limites des deux premières approches : un modèle praxéologique qui s'appuie sur la praxis comme activité organisante de perspectives partagées ; un modèle de l'incommunication qui fait de l'impossibilité d'aboutir à l'intercompréhension la norme des relations sociales.

La question cosmopolite trouve toute son importance au sein des Sciences de l'information et de la communication en ce qu'elle fixe le fait politique à partir d'un double rapport : celui qui se produit entre l'individu et le collectif et celui qui a lieu entre le local et le global. Dans une perspective habermassienne, ce double rapport peut se traduire par une approche du politique articulée selon deux axes : celui de l'action et celui de la communication. Cet article propose une distinction entre ces deux concepts et en fait le pivot d'une conception cosmopolite des institutions non nationales à la lumière de laquelle le cas de la guerre en Irak peut être en dernier lieu analysé.

La communication politique, objet longtemps délaissé par la science politique française, a éveillé un intérêt croissant, depuis les années 1980, parmi les politistes portés à l'analyse sociologique des phénomènes politiques. Leur démarche a consisté à interroger les mythologies et les croyances fondatrices du monde de la communication politique, à caractériser la place des conseillers en communication politique parmi les spécialistes du travail politique ainsi qu'à tenter de mesurer certains des effets produits par la généralisation de cette activité sur le déroulement de la vie politique. Ces travaux ouvrent de fructueuses perspectives pour la compréhension des transformations en cours des systèmes politiques contemporains.

Political communication, which had long been forsaken by the French political science, has, since the eighties, met with renewed & growing interest among political analysts whose concern lies in the sociological analysis of political phenomena. They have endeavored to question the mythologies & founding beliefs of the realm of political communication & to characterize the role of spin doctors among the experts in politics. They have also attempted to assess the effects produced by the generalization of that activity on the unfolding of political life. This research opens up fruitful perspectives for the comprehension of the ongoing transformations/alterations of contemporary political systems. Adapted from the source document.