Suchergebnisse

Historically & at their inception the East European Communist parties differed greatly from one another. Whereas those of Czechoslovakia, Hungary, & Poland were workers' parties, those of Bulgaria & Rumania were essentially parties of revolutionary intellectuals. From 1945-1948 the Communist parties, strongly supported by Soviet military power, established their one-party dictatorships. There followed a period of intensive econ pressures to create the maximum in heavy industry & general mobilization. Though the pattern was the same in all these countries, some were more severely affected than others. Where revolutions did occur-as in Poland & Hungary-a definite cleavage of opinion at the highest level of the party existed as did a surviving Communist leader of great prestige who symbolized all the desire for reform & freedom which had accumulated over the yrs. In the remainder of Eastern Europe the parties, internally unstable though they are, have changed very little. It will, nonetheless, be well to watch here for diff's in personalities, policies, & tactics, for in changed international circumstances these may prove pol'ally decisive. AAAPSS.

Historically and at their inception the East European Communist parties differed greatly from one another. Whereas those of Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland were workers' parties, those of Bulgaria and Rumania were essentially parties of revolutionary intellectuals. From 1945 to 1948 the Com munist parties, strongly supported by Soviet military power, established their one-party dictatorships. There followed a period of intensive economic pres sures in order to create the maximum in heavy industry and general mobiliza tion. Though the pattern was the same in all these countries, some were more severely affected than others. Where revolutions did occur—as in Poland and Hungary—a definite cleavage of opinion at the highest level of the party existed as did a surviving Communist leader of great prestige who symbolized all the desire for reform and freedom which had accumulated over the years. In the remainder of Eastern Europe the parties, internally unstable though they are, have changed very little. It will, nonetheless, be well to watch here for differ ences in personalities, policies, and tactics, for in changed international circum stances these may prove politically decisive.—Ed.

Modified version of the checklist prepared for inclusion in the "Yearbook on international communist affairs, 1983."

Modified version of the checklist prepared for inclusion in the "Yearbook on international communist affairs, 1985."

Modified version of the checklist prepared for inclusion in the "Yearbook on international communist affairs, 1984."

Modified version of the checklist prepared for inclusion in the "Yearbook on international communist affairs, 1986." Developments; includes data on party membership, party leaders, and percent of vote in last election.

Report on a meeting of the Communist and Workers' Parties of Latin America and the Caribbean, held in Mexico City, Nov. 1990.