Suchergebnisse

The declining attention of young voters on several aspects makes political education very vital for the sustainability of democracy in Indonesia. Political education for students who are young voters in this case are students of the Constitutional Law is considered important to increase their participation at the tertiary level, namely the election of DEMA (Student Executive Council) IAIN Madura. This study used an approach to students of the Constitutional Law study program, Islamic State Faculty of IAIN Madura through observation and interviews as well as data collection supported by document studies through several relevant kinds of literature so that data triangulation was then carried out to produce valid data. The results showed that in the aspect of students' initial knowledge about elections from several informants of the Constitutional Law study program students obtained data that they already had a good understanding of. Then on the aspect of student perspectives on campus politics, some of them do not know information about the election of the chairman of the DEMA (Student Executive Council) due to several reasons behind it. So then to increase student political participation in the election of the chairman of DEMA the author formulated three political stimuli, namely through learning political science courses, through campus organizations, and mass media.

In the era of independence, guided democracy, the new order, until the era ofgovernance reform in Indonesia tended to override the importance of diversity.Power consolidation tends to deny the existence of customary law community unitsand is usually accompanied by etatism tendencies. This article describes how theexistence and regulation of customary law community units as subjects ofConstitutional Law. The conclusion obtained is that the existence and regulation ofcustomary law community units as subjects of constitutional law in the legal systemof the Republic of Indonesia constitution is guaranteed and recognized based on theprovisions of Article 28 B paragraph (2) article and 28 I paragraph (3) of the 1945Constitution, as well as in Article 6 UU no. 39 of 1999 concerning human rights

The decision of Indonesian Constitutional Court No. 100/PUU-XII/2015 legitimizing single candidate give solution for democracy deadlock in some regions.Based on that decision, The Election Commission make a regulation giving alternative for some regions having only one candidate for choosing the picture of candidate against empty box.These battle in the beginning seems not fair because of political intention, empty box has no resources to compete with candidate. But, in the local election 2018, in some regions, empty box success to gain more voters than his rival. Winning of empty box in contestation of democracy became a proof that people feel tired because the system of regeneration in political parties not running well, other proof that single candidate that bring up by all political parties not always supported by voters. In the Indonesia constitutional law, the phenomenon of empty box surely implicate tomany problems. This writing will try to see this phenomenon and its implication according to Indonesian constitutional law.

The Constitution and the implementing regulations of the Constitution in the folosifis Indonesiai emphasis on equality and justice between men and women (equality and equity) through the development of the law with a cored Legal policy making and reform of the legal materials to suit your needs. But the normative contraction occurs when the Affirmative Policy in order to speed up justice and equality between men and women laiki has been canceled by the Constitutional Court's decision to cancel the fifth paragraph of Article 205 of Law No. 10 In 2008 the elected legislators decide the candidate by a majority vote. This clearly constitutes a waiver of gender inequality in the political sphere.

The execution of the State Administrative Court Decision which has permanent legal force (inkracht van Gewijsde) in the era of autonomy is as wide as possible, and begins with the breakdown of the paradigm of regional autonomy in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 18, Article 18A and Article 18B, the implementation of regional government is based on the principles that become the normative basis. State Administrative Court decisions that cannot be executed have caused pessimism and apathy in society. The problem is that there is no executive power in the Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the Regulation of State Administration. This condition is an alarming fact that the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision has not been able to bring justice to the public in the administrative sphere of government. The principle of the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision, to place judicial control in the implementation of good governance becomes biased in the Indonesian constitutional system.

Sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, kepala daerah dipilih langsung oleh rakyat melalui Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah atau disingkat menjadi Pilkada.Pertimbangan penting pemilihan langsung untuk pengembangan demokrasi di Indonesia. (1) Pilkada langsung adalah jawaban atas tuntutan aspirasi rakyat (2) Pilkada langsung adalah realisasi Konstitusi dan UUD 1945. (3) Pilkada langsung adalah sarana belajar demokrasi untuk rakyat. (4) Pilkada langsung sebagai sarana untuk memperkuat otonomi daerah. (5) Pilkada langsung adalah alat penting untuk proses kader kepemimpinan nasional.Pemilihan langsung diharapkan membawa banyak manfaat bagi perkembangan demokrasi, pemerintahan lokal dan kinerja lembaga politik lokal.Setiap model pemilihan kepala daerah pasti memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangan, tetapi pada dasarnya, ketentuan pilkada langsung oleh rakyat atau tidak langsung oleh parlemen sama-sama demokratis dan konstitusional. Pemerintah telah berusaha memperbaiki dan memperbaiki sistem pemilu di Indonesia, untuk itu kita harus menghargai sebagai suatu proses yang akan terus disempurnakan sampai sebuah sistem ditemukan yang benar-benar ideal untuk bangsa Indonesia.Since the enactment of Law Number 32 Year 2004 regarding Regional Government, the regional head is elected directly by the people through the Election of Regional Head and Deputy Head of Region or abbreviated to Regional Head Election.Important consideration of direct elections for the development of democracy in Indonesia. (1) It's an answer to the demands of the people's aspirations (2) It's the realization of the Constitution and the 1945 Constitution. (3) It's a means of learning of democracy for the people. (4) It's as a means to strengthen regional autonomy. (5) It's an important tool for the process of national leadership cadre.Direct elections are expected to bring many benefits to the development of democracy, local governance and performance of local political institutions.Each model of the election of regional heads must have advantages and disadvantages, but in essence, the provisions of local elections directly by the people or indirectly by the parliament are equally democratic and constitutional. The government has tried to improve and improve the electoral system in Indonesia, For that we must be appreciate as a process that will be continuously perfected until a system is found that is truly ideal for the Indonesian nation.