The paper presents the most prominent 20th century trumpet teachers of the United States (V. Cichowicz, W. Vacchiano) and Russia (Y. Bolshiyanov, T. Dokshizer), which best reflect the trumpet schools of these countries. In both schools of trumpet, both in the United States and Russia, playing the trumpet is united by a look through an artistic prism, an effort to copy and align its phrasing to vocalists and string players, and to keep up with virtuosity. Trumpet teachers in the United States paid close attention to the technological side of playing, breathing and articulation, doing everything they could to make it easier to achieve the result. Russian trumpet teachers, meanwhile, paid close attention to finding an individual method of engaging each trumpet player. Also important for trumpet teachers in the United States was musical artistic interpretation, for which sound, its concept and work with sound were crucial, while Russian trumpet teachers focused specifically on preparing trumpet players to play in symphony orchestras and prepare for the challenges ahead.
Ideological restraints are dysfunction of journalistic work. This phenomenon is often detected in "not free" countries. In this article the Russian case is analysed (140th place in "Press Freedom Index 2010" by Reporters Without Borders and "not free" country in "Map of Press Freedom 2011" by Freedom House). Journalists in Russia often fall under pressure of central government and local politics in the regions. Internet is an area of free information circulation. It's main point of internet effect. Information makes imprint in the World Wide Web. In terms of copy/ paste and share traditions information there is quite safe, because it's hard to block or remove "undesirable" content from Internet. World Wide Web becomes an alternative political space without possibility of direct influence by single political power. Journalists can use Internet to turn ideological restraints. When there is no possibility to publish information in official mass-media, this information could be leak in private Internet sphere: blogs, social networks, private web pages etc. But "Internet diffusion cannot be considered a democratic panacea" (how it is noted by Jacob Groshek). Internet effect is more powerful in democratic countries and less powerful in countries, which are "not free". Therefore the author of this article concludes that: 1) Internet could be a tool to turn ideological restraints; 2) Democratic effect of Internet becomes significant in terms of general democratic changes; 3) In Russia Internet sphere becomes an important alternative to public sphere, which is under political control. The role of Internet in Russia could grow up if evolution of politic system of the country would move towards democracy.
Ideological restraints are dysfunction of journalistic work. This phenomenon is often detected in "not free" countries. In this article the Russian case is analysed (140th place in "Press Freedom Index 2010" by Reporters Without Borders and "not free" country in "Map of Press Freedom 2011" by Freedom House). Journalists in Russia often fall under pressure of central government and local politics in the regions. Internet is an area of free information circulation. It's main point of internet effect. Information makes imprint in the World Wide Web. In terms of copy/ paste and share traditions information there is quite safe, because it's hard to block or remove "undesirable" content from Internet. World Wide Web becomes an alternative political space without possibility of direct influence by single political power. Journalists can use Internet to turn ideological restraints. When there is no possibility to publish information in official mass-media, this information could be leak in private Internet sphere: blogs, social networks, private web pages etc. But "Internet diffusion cannot be considered a democratic panacea" (how it is noted by Jacob Groshek). Internet effect is more powerful in democratic countries and less powerful in countries, which are "not free". Therefore the author of this article concludes that: 1) Internet could be a tool to turn ideological restraints; 2) Democratic effect of Internet becomes significant in terms of general democratic changes; 3) In Russia Internet sphere becomes an important alternative to public sphere, which is under political control. The role of Internet in Russia could grow up if evolution of politic system of the country would move towards democracy.
Ideological restraints are dysfunction of journalistic work. This phenomenon is often detected in "not free" countries. In this article the Russian case is analysed (140th place in "Press Freedom Index 2010" by Reporters Without Borders and "not free" country in "Map of Press Freedom 2011" by Freedom House). Journalists in Russia often fall under pressure of central government and local politics in the regions. Internet is an area of free information circulation. It's main point of internet effect. Information makes imprint in the World Wide Web. In terms of copy/ paste and share traditions information there is quite safe, because it's hard to block or remove "undesirable" content from Internet. World Wide Web becomes an alternative political space without possibility of direct influence by single political power. Journalists can use Internet to turn ideological restraints. When there is no possibility to publish information in official mass-media, this information could be leak in private Internet sphere: blogs, social networks, private web pages etc. But "Internet diffusion cannot be considered a democratic panacea" (how it is noted by Jacob Groshek). Internet effect is more powerful in democratic countries and less powerful in countries, which are "not free". Therefore the author of this article concludes that: 1) Internet could be a tool to turn ideological restraints; 2) Democratic effect of Internet becomes significant in terms of general democratic changes; 3) In Russia Internet sphere becomes an important alternative to public sphere, which is under political control. The role of Internet in Russia could grow up if evolution of politic system of the country would move towards democracy.
Ideological restraints are dysfunction of journalistic work. This phenomenon is often detected in "not free" countries. In this article the Russian case is analysed (140th place in "Press Freedom Index 2010" by Reporters Without Borders and "not free" country in "Map of Press Freedom 2011" by Freedom House). Journalists in Russia often fall under pressure of central government and local politics in the regions. Internet is an area of free information circulation. It's main point of internet effect. Information makes imprint in the World Wide Web. In terms of copy/ paste and share traditions information there is quite safe, because it's hard to block or remove "undesirable" content from Internet. World Wide Web becomes an alternative political space without possibility of direct influence by single political power. Journalists can use Internet to turn ideological restraints. When there is no possibility to publish information in official mass-media, this information could be leak in private Internet sphere: blogs, social networks, private web pages etc. But "Internet diffusion cannot be considered a democratic panacea" (how it is noted by Jacob Groshek). Internet effect is more powerful in democratic countries and less powerful in countries, which are "not free". Therefore the author of this article concludes that: 1) Internet could be a tool to turn ideological restraints; 2) Democratic effect of Internet becomes significant in terms of general democratic changes; 3) In Russia Internet sphere becomes an important alternative to public sphere, which is under political control. The role of Internet in Russia could grow up if evolution of politic system of the country would move towards democracy.
In the 21st century governmental institutions and media in Lithuania pay a lot of attention to the development of "information" or "knowledge" society and are engaged in practical implementation of information technology (IT). Governmental institutions are concerned to keep pace with the European Union and neighbouring countries, especially Baltic countries, level. To develop and implement society's computer literacy require necessary technologies and means for which creation and development it is obligatory to possess computer devices, IT specialists, there ought to be approval of the state and society and reciprocal concern. School library as one of the most important parts in school experiences and has to overcome all the changes in educational and cultural systems to keep with information society. In order not to stay behind from public and academic libraries, which are provided with modern technologies, school libraries also must have electronic catalogue, which would facilitate the accounting and management of funds, delivery of the recourses existent in the funds. The Ministry of Education and Science in Lithuania announced the contest and in 2003 gave the licence to Ltd "Sintagma" which created software called MOBIS (information system of school libraries). The paper reviewed and evaluated implementation, different stages of implementation and functional potential of for schools designed computer-based catalogue MOBIS in Lithuanian schools' libraries, a survey of librarians in Lithuanian schools about implementation of this program in their working place, advantages and disadvantages of the system was carried out. According to the librarians, who have already installed electronic catalogue MOBIS, the system has essentially facilitated their work. MOBIS system gives them a chance to administer comfortably school library's funds. Cataloguing, gathering, administration and search of issues are performed quickly and efficiently. The system also provides a possibility to connect to the catalogues of other schools and copy the descriptions of issues. It helps to save time. However, many school libraries get not enough sponsorship and the support from school's resources is not sufficient so not all libraries are able to purchase the hardware necessary to work with the program MOBIS. The installation of MOBIS program in Lithuania's schools was planned to be accomplished till the end of 2006. Unfortunately, only a small number of schools can boast of full implementation and usage of this program. Although only in one third of schools this program is already installed, the work is not fully accomplished yet because there is a lack of necessary skills, time resources are too short, a shortage of librarians, there are not enough courses about installation and administration of MOBIS for librarians. Therefore a great deal of work waits for school librarians. Now it is difficult to foresee the problems. First steps are always complicated, however, namely the first steps confirmed the benefit of school libraries' computerisation and software MOBIS which also showed new work possibilities in the area of cataloguing, gathering and users' service.
In the 21st century governmental institutions and media in Lithuania pay a lot of attention to the development of "information" or "knowledge" society and are engaged in practical implementation of information technology (IT). Governmental institutions are concerned to keep pace with the European Union and neighbouring countries, especially Baltic countries, level. To develop and implement society's computer literacy require necessary technologies and means for which creation and development it is obligatory to possess computer devices, IT specialists, there ought to be approval of the state and society and reciprocal concern. School library as one of the most important parts in school experiences and has to overcome all the changes in educational and cultural systems to keep with information society. In order not to stay behind from public and academic libraries, which are provided with modern technologies, school libraries also must have electronic catalogue, which would facilitate the accounting and management of funds, delivery of the recourses existent in the funds. The Ministry of Education and Science in Lithuania announced the contest and in 2003 gave the licence to Ltd "Sintagma" which created software called MOBIS (information system of school libraries). The paper reviewed and evaluated implementation, different stages of implementation and functional potential of for schools designed computer-based catalogue MOBIS in Lithuanian schools' libraries, a survey of librarians in Lithuanian schools about implementation of this program in their working place, advantages and disadvantages of the system was carried out. According to the librarians, who have already installed electronic catalogue MOBIS, the system has essentially facilitated their work. MOBIS system gives them a chance to administer comfortably school library's funds. Cataloguing, gathering, administration and search of issues are performed quickly and efficiently. The system also provides a possibility to connect to the catalogues of other schools and copy the descriptions of issues. It helps to save time. However, many school libraries get not enough sponsorship and the support from school's resources is not sufficient so not all libraries are able to purchase the hardware necessary to work with the program MOBIS. The installation of MOBIS program in Lithuania's schools was planned to be accomplished till the end of 2006. Unfortunately, only a small number of schools can boast of full implementation and usage of this program. Although only in one third of schools this program is already installed, the work is not fully accomplished yet because there is a lack of necessary skills, time resources are too short, a shortage of librarians, there are not enough courses about installation and administration of MOBIS for librarians. Therefore a great deal of work waits for school librarians. Now it is difficult to foresee the problems. First steps are always complicated, however, namely the first steps confirmed the benefit of school libraries' computerisation and software MOBIS which also showed new work possibilities in the area of cataloguing, gathering and users' service.
In the 21st century governmental institutions and media in Lithuania pay a lot of attention to the development of "information" or "knowledge" society and are engaged in practical implementation of information technology (IT). Governmental institutions are concerned to keep pace with the European Union and neighbouring countries, especially Baltic countries, level. To develop and implement society's computer literacy require necessary technologies and means for which creation and development it is obligatory to possess computer devices, IT specialists, there ought to be approval of the state and society and reciprocal concern. School library as one of the most important parts in school experiences and has to overcome all the changes in educational and cultural systems to keep with information society. In order not to stay behind from public and academic libraries, which are provided with modern technologies, school libraries also must have electronic catalogue, which would facilitate the accounting and management of funds, delivery of the recourses existent in the funds. The Ministry of Education and Science in Lithuania announced the contest and in 2003 gave the licence to Ltd "Sintagma" which created software called MOBIS (information system of school libraries). The paper reviewed and evaluated implementation, different stages of implementation and functional potential of for schools designed computer-based catalogue MOBIS in Lithuanian schools' libraries, a survey of librarians in Lithuanian schools about implementation of this program in their working place, advantages and disadvantages of the system was carried out. According to the librarians, who have already installed electronic catalogue MOBIS, the system has essentially facilitated their work. MOBIS system gives them a chance to administer comfortably school library's funds. Cataloguing, gathering, administration and search of issues are performed quickly and efficiently. The system also provides a possibility to connect to the catalogues of other schools and copy the descriptions of issues. It helps to save time. However, many school libraries get not enough sponsorship and the support from school's resources is not sufficient so not all libraries are able to purchase the hardware necessary to work with the program MOBIS. The installation of MOBIS program in Lithuania's schools was planned to be accomplished till the end of 2006. Unfortunately, only a small number of schools can boast of full implementation and usage of this program. Although only in one third of schools this program is already installed, the work is not fully accomplished yet because there is a lack of necessary skills, time resources are too short, a shortage of librarians, there are not enough courses about installation and administration of MOBIS for librarians. Therefore a great deal of work waits for school librarians. Now it is difficult to foresee the problems. First steps are always complicated, however, namely the first steps confirmed the benefit of school libraries' computerisation and software MOBIS which also showed new work possibilities in the area of cataloguing, gathering and users' service.
In the 21st century governmental institutions and media in Lithuania pay a lot of attention to the development of "information" or "knowledge" society and are engaged in practical implementation of information technology (IT). Governmental institutions are concerned to keep pace with the European Union and neighbouring countries, especially Baltic countries, level. To develop and implement society's computer literacy require necessary technologies and means for which creation and development it is obligatory to possess computer devices, IT specialists, there ought to be approval of the state and society and reciprocal concern. School library as one of the most important parts in school experiences and has to overcome all the changes in educational and cultural systems to keep with information society. In order not to stay behind from public and academic libraries, which are provided with modern technologies, school libraries also must have electronic catalogue, which would facilitate the accounting and management of funds, delivery of the recourses existent in the funds. The Ministry of Education and Science in Lithuania announced the contest and in 2003 gave the licence to Ltd "Sintagma" which created software called MOBIS (information system of school libraries). The paper reviewed and evaluated implementation, different stages of implementation and functional potential of for schools designed computer-based catalogue MOBIS in Lithuanian schools' libraries, a survey of librarians in Lithuanian schools about implementation of this program in their working place, advantages and disadvantages of the system was carried out. According to the librarians, who have already installed electronic catalogue MOBIS, the system has essentially facilitated their work. MOBIS system gives them a chance to administer comfortably school library's funds. Cataloguing, gathering, administration and search of issues are performed quickly and efficiently. The system also provides a possibility to connect to the catalogues of other schools and copy the descriptions of issues. It helps to save time. However, many school libraries get not enough sponsorship and the support from school's resources is not sufficient so not all libraries are able to purchase the hardware necessary to work with the program MOBIS. The installation of MOBIS program in Lithuania's schools was planned to be accomplished till the end of 2006. Unfortunately, only a small number of schools can boast of full implementation and usage of this program. Although only in one third of schools this program is already installed, the work is not fully accomplished yet because there is a lack of necessary skills, time resources are too short, a shortage of librarians, there are not enough courses about installation and administration of MOBIS for librarians. Therefore a great deal of work waits for school librarians. Now it is difficult to foresee the problems. First steps are always complicated, however, namely the first steps confirmed the benefit of school libraries' computerisation and software MOBIS which also showed new work possibilities in the area of cataloguing, gathering and users' service.
Human right to freedom is a fundamental, inherent, constitutional right. It is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the laws and the international character of the legislation, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. That legislation not only states but also indicate on what basis, and the manner in which state authorities may be limited. Supervision measure is temporary legal custody to a prison term. On pre-trial stage, only one participant in the criminal process may be arrested - the suspect. A person becomes a suspect when he is detained suspected, that he made an offense, or heard about the act, which act he is suspected, or when summoned to the hearing when it is drawn up on suspicion. It is also when the person absconded and his whereabouts are unknown, it is suspected or recognized as a prosecutor has ordered or investigating judge has ordered; and when it is satisfied in the special request for the witness to make him under suspicion. At the becoming as a suspect, at the same time a person can be arrested. From the moment of arrest the suspect becomes ,,being arrested'', and acquire some specific rights that exist in this pre-trial supervision measures in the appointment. The first right within 48 hours to be delivered to the competent investigating judge for questioning the validity of the arrest, which itself contains two elements: the immediate delivery and that only an independent and impartial judge can address the issues of detention. After the adversary he acquires the rights: to know the grounds of arrest and the investigation materials, which are based on the basics. Informed about it, the suspect may effectively exercise its right to give explanations and comments on the feasibility and legality of detention, to provide relevant articles and documents. ,,Being arrested'' suspect gets some legal options of non-interest in the legitimacy of the arrest: right to choose their own persons, and to inform them about the arrest, or ask the prosecutor about the unconscious, as well as the right to ask a prosecutor to take care of his minor children and property. When investigating judge has ordered the allocation of the detention, the arrested suspect has the last opportunity to avoid pre-trial detention - appeal against the ruling. This right is one of the elements of habeas corpus right, contained by Convention. If ,,being arrested'' suspect order don't give an appeal, or his appeal is rejected, he becomes an ,,arrested'' suspect. It' status implements its own, as the suspect's rights, but they acquire some certain specificity: the right of defense of the essential aspects - the arrested suspect haves the right to representation and participation is necessary legal assistance being, and the opportunity to negotiate with him without outsiders. Criminal Procedure Act limited the arrested suspects right at any time of the pre-trial investigation get the pretrial investigations documents, and to provide a copy, as well as the right of appeal to the competent officials of the decisions and actions. Meanwhile, the right to make a significant objects and documents is usually implemented through the law to apply to the prosecutor of the proceedings and the execution of the necessary legal assistance participation. Arrested suspect has some specific rights, which the usual suspect doesn't have: the right to legal proceedings within a reasonable time, which relates to the unreasonably long detention inadmissibility, the right to ask the court to check the lawfulness of detention periodically (the second element of habeas corpus right), and the right to compensation for unlawful arrest, and others. It should be noted that only a small part of ,,being arrested'' suspects rights, which doesn't have usual suspect, is enshrined in the CPA. Many of them are under the Convention or is apparent from the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
Human right to freedom is a fundamental, inherent, constitutional right. It is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the laws and the international character of the legislation, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. That legislation not only states but also indicate on what basis, and the manner in which state authorities may be limited. Supervision measure is temporary legal custody to a prison term. On pre-trial stage, only one participant in the criminal process may be arrested - the suspect. A person becomes a suspect when he is detained suspected, that he made an offense, or heard about the act, which act he is suspected, or when summoned to the hearing when it is drawn up on suspicion. It is also when the person absconded and his whereabouts are unknown, it is suspected or recognized as a prosecutor has ordered or investigating judge has ordered; and when it is satisfied in the special request for the witness to make him under suspicion. At the becoming as a suspect, at the same time a person can be arrested. From the moment of arrest the suspect becomes ,,being arrested'', and acquire some specific rights that exist in this pre-trial supervision measures in the appointment. The first right within 48 hours to be delivered to the competent investigating judge for questioning the validity of the arrest, which itself contains two elements: the immediate delivery and that only an independent and impartial judge can address the issues of detention. After the adversary he acquires the rights: to know the grounds of arrest and the investigation materials, which are based on the basics. Informed about it, the suspect may effectively exercise its right to give explanations and comments on the feasibility and legality of detention, to provide relevant articles and documents. ,,Being arrested'' suspect gets some legal options of non-interest in the legitimacy of the arrest: right to choose their own persons, and to inform them about the arrest, or ask the prosecutor about the unconscious, as well as the right to ask a prosecutor to take care of his minor children and property. When investigating judge has ordered the allocation of the detention, the arrested suspect has the last opportunity to avoid pre-trial detention - appeal against the ruling. This right is one of the elements of habeas corpus right, contained by Convention. If ,,being arrested'' suspect order don't give an appeal, or his appeal is rejected, he becomes an ,,arrested'' suspect. It' status implements its own, as the suspect's rights, but they acquire some certain specificity: the right of defense of the essential aspects - the arrested suspect haves the right to representation and participation is necessary legal assistance being, and the opportunity to negotiate with him without outsiders. Criminal Procedure Act limited the arrested suspects right at any time of the pre-trial investigation get the pretrial investigations documents, and to provide a copy, as well as the right of appeal to the competent officials of the decisions and actions. Meanwhile, the right to make a significant objects and documents is usually implemented through the law to apply to the prosecutor of the proceedings and the execution of the necessary legal assistance participation. Arrested suspect has some specific rights, which the usual suspect doesn't have: the right to legal proceedings within a reasonable time, which relates to the unreasonably long detention inadmissibility, the right to ask the court to check the lawfulness of detention periodically (the second element of habeas corpus right), and the right to compensation for unlawful arrest, and others. It should be noted that only a small part of ,,being arrested'' suspects rights, which doesn't have usual suspect, is enshrined in the CPA. Many of them are under the Convention or is apparent from the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
Human right to freedom is a fundamental, inherent, constitutional right. It is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the laws and the international character of the legislation, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. That legislation not only states but also indicate on what basis, and the manner in which state authorities may be limited. Supervision measure is temporary legal custody to a prison term. On pre-trial stage, only one participant in the criminal process may be arrested - the suspect. A person becomes a suspect when he is detained suspected, that he made an offense, or heard about the act, which act he is suspected, or when summoned to the hearing when it is drawn up on suspicion. It is also when the person absconded and his whereabouts are unknown, it is suspected or recognized as a prosecutor has ordered or investigating judge has ordered; and when it is satisfied in the special request for the witness to make him under suspicion. At the becoming as a suspect, at the same time a person can be arrested. From the moment of arrest the suspect becomes ,,being arrested'', and acquire some specific rights that exist in this pre-trial supervision measures in the appointment. The first right within 48 hours to be delivered to the competent investigating judge for questioning the validity of the arrest, which itself contains two elements: the immediate delivery and that only an independent and impartial judge can address the issues of detention. After the adversary he acquires the rights: to know the grounds of arrest and the investigation materials, which are based on the basics. Informed about it, the suspect may effectively exercise its right to give explanations and comments on the feasibility and legality of detention, to provide relevant articles and documents. ,,Being arrested'' suspect gets some legal options of non-interest in the legitimacy of the arrest: right to choose their own persons, and to inform them about the arrest, or ask the prosecutor about the unconscious, as well as the right to ask a prosecutor to take care of his minor children and property. When investigating judge has ordered the allocation of the detention, the arrested suspect has the last opportunity to avoid pre-trial detention - appeal against the ruling. This right is one of the elements of habeas corpus right, contained by Convention. If ,,being arrested'' suspect order don't give an appeal, or his appeal is rejected, he becomes an ,,arrested'' suspect. It' status implements its own, as the suspect's rights, but they acquire some certain specificity: the right of defense of the essential aspects - the arrested suspect haves the right to representation and participation is necessary legal assistance being, and the opportunity to negotiate with him without outsiders. Criminal Procedure Act limited the arrested suspects right at any time of the pre-trial investigation get the pretrial investigations documents, and to provide a copy, as well as the right of appeal to the competent officials of the decisions and actions. Meanwhile, the right to make a significant objects and documents is usually implemented through the law to apply to the prosecutor of the proceedings and the execution of the necessary legal assistance participation. Arrested suspect has some specific rights, which the usual suspect doesn't have: the right to legal proceedings within a reasonable time, which relates to the unreasonably long detention inadmissibility, the right to ask the court to check the lawfulness of detention periodically (the second element of habeas corpus right), and the right to compensation for unlawful arrest, and others. It should be noted that only a small part of ,,being arrested'' suspects rights, which doesn't have usual suspect, is enshrined in the CPA. Many of them are under the Convention or is apparent from the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
Human right to freedom is a fundamental, inherent, constitutional right. It is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the laws and the international character of the legislation, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. That legislation not only states but also indicate on what basis, and the manner in which state authorities may be limited. Supervision measure is temporary legal custody to a prison term. On pre-trial stage, only one participant in the criminal process may be arrested - the suspect. A person becomes a suspect when he is detained suspected, that he made an offense, or heard about the act, which act he is suspected, or when summoned to the hearing when it is drawn up on suspicion. It is also when the person absconded and his whereabouts are unknown, it is suspected or recognized as a prosecutor has ordered or investigating judge has ordered; and when it is satisfied in the special request for the witness to make him under suspicion. At the becoming as a suspect, at the same time a person can be arrested. From the moment of arrest the suspect becomes ,,being arrested'', and acquire some specific rights that exist in this pre-trial supervision measures in the appointment. The first right within 48 hours to be delivered to the competent investigating judge for questioning the validity of the arrest, which itself contains two elements: the immediate delivery and that only an independent and impartial judge can address the issues of detention. After the adversary he acquires the rights: to know the grounds of arrest and the investigation materials, which are based on the basics. Informed about it, the suspect may effectively exercise its right to give explanations and comments on the feasibility and legality of detention, to provide relevant articles and documents. ,,Being arrested'' suspect gets some legal options of non-interest in the legitimacy of the arrest: right to choose their own persons, and to inform them about the arrest, or ask the prosecutor about the unconscious, as well as the right to ask a prosecutor to take care of his minor children and property. When investigating judge has ordered the allocation of the detention, the arrested suspect has the last opportunity to avoid pre-trial detention - appeal against the ruling. This right is one of the elements of habeas corpus right, contained by Convention. If ,,being arrested'' suspect order don't give an appeal, or his appeal is rejected, he becomes an ,,arrested'' suspect. It' status implements its own, as the suspect's rights, but they acquire some certain specificity: the right of defense of the essential aspects - the arrested suspect haves the right to representation and participation is necessary legal assistance being, and the opportunity to negotiate with him without outsiders. Criminal Procedure Act limited the arrested suspects right at any time of the pre-trial investigation get the pretrial investigations documents, and to provide a copy, as well as the right of appeal to the competent officials of the decisions and actions. Meanwhile, the right to make a significant objects and documents is usually implemented through the law to apply to the prosecutor of the proceedings and the execution of the necessary legal assistance participation. Arrested suspect has some specific rights, which the usual suspect doesn't have: the right to legal proceedings within a reasonable time, which relates to the unreasonably long detention inadmissibility, the right to ask the court to check the lawfulness of detention periodically (the second element of habeas corpus right), and the right to compensation for unlawful arrest, and others. It should be noted that only a small part of ,,being arrested'' suspects rights, which doesn't have usual suspect, is enshrined in the CPA. Many of them are under the Convention or is apparent from the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
The object of this master thesis is a process of forming new ecological policy and waste management system of collecting, recycling and utilization of municipal waste in Ukraine. The main purpose of the theses is to determine features and problems of the functioning of the waste management system in Ukraine in light of the country's obligations resulted from signing of the Association Agreement between European Union (EU) and Ukraine in 2014. The main objectives of the theses are to research world's best practices in waste management, to analyze recycling processes of the system and waste recycling hierarchy options, to research laws and regulations of the EU and Ukraine in waste management to focus on main principles; to make an analyses of the empirical data received from expert interviews to summarize specifics and problems of the whole waste management system. The following methods were used such as analyses of the scientific literature and statistical data as well as laws and regulations and qualitative methods of analyses of expert interviews with state employee of the ecological body and employees of non-government organizations. The following conclusion was made that current ecological policy of Ukraine in regards with waste management system needs a correction in areas of implementation of European ecological standards. Ukraine is in a state of deep structural reforms under a heavy burden of different ecological problems. Current status of the waste management system and its functioning mechanisms do not allow handling constantly increasing volume of waste to make it economically beneficial and to be effective in ecological sense. Utility tariffs for waste management do not cover a fraction of the cost to collect, transport and recycle waste. Collection of waste products is not well coordinated, the lack of a clear division of areas of responsibility between collectors, carriers and those responsible for recycling leads to their demotivation in the qualitative results of each stage of waste treatment, which as a result leads to a small percentage of secondary material resources extracted from waste. In the regions, the problem of collection leads to unauthorized landfills. There is a communications problem between central government, local authorities and general public, when legislation norms and requirements are adopted and then an understanding comes in that neither conditions nor infrastructure readiness can handle these legislation initiatives. General public is not well informed on basics of the ecological policy which is only done by non-government organizations, which is definitely not enough. Low utility rates for waste disposal do not meet the basic principle of the environmental policy on minimizing landfills disposal volumes. The lack of a unified system of accounting for transported and disposed wastes and criteria may be a reason for obtaining the distorted data necessary for further quality planning. The prevention and minimization of waste generation is not considered at the legislative level as apriority principle of environmental policy in the field of waste management. Lack of funding and worn out infrastructure does not allow implementing new recycling technologies in full. Copy and paste approach of the EU ecological legislation does not help to resolve problems in Ukraine. Cohesion policy and integration practices of the EU and Ukraine require thorough planning and precise implementation with performance indicators. Ecological integration must be executed in a framework of current legislation considering current local conditions and practices, the infrastructure status, recommendations of non-government organizations and donors as well as EU experience in implementing such a policy. During five years since Ukraine signed Association Agreement with the EU and its member-states a significant progress was made in coherence policy of the waste management system; however dynamics of positive changes are quit low. The Government in cooperation with NGOs, donors and general public is in a good position to develop ecological norms and requirements and successfully implement it to create mechanisms of stimulus and rationale for all actors of the waste management system in line with EU policy guidelines. The author believes that the results of the study could give useful guidelines to students, researchers, people involved in governance, legislation, management and public policy and whose, whom personal and professional interests lie in the area of ecology, environmental protection and waste management.
The object of this master thesis is a process of forming new ecological policy and waste management system of collecting, recycling and utilization of municipal waste in Ukraine. The main purpose of the theses is to determine features and problems of the functioning of the waste management system in Ukraine in light of the country's obligations resulted from signing of the Association Agreement between European Union (EU) and Ukraine in 2014. The main objectives of the theses are to research world's best practices in waste management, to analyze recycling processes of the system and waste recycling hierarchy options, to research laws and regulations of the EU and Ukraine in waste management to focus on main principles; to make an analyses of the empirical data received from expert interviews to summarize specifics and problems of the whole waste management system. The following methods were used such as analyses of the scientific literature and statistical data as well as laws and regulations and qualitative methods of analyses of expert interviews with state employee of the ecological body and employees of non-government organizations. The following conclusion was made that current ecological policy of Ukraine in regards with waste management system needs a correction in areas of implementation of European ecological standards. Ukraine is in a state of deep structural reforms under a heavy burden of different ecological problems. Current status of the waste management system and its functioning mechanisms do not allow handling constantly increasing volume of waste to make it economically beneficial and to be effective in ecological sense. Utility tariffs for waste management do not cover a fraction of the cost to collect, transport and recycle waste. Collection of waste products is not well coordinated, the lack of a clear division of areas of responsibility between collectors, carriers and those responsible for recycling leads to their demotivation in the qualitative results of each stage of waste treatment, which as a result leads to a small percentage of secondary material resources extracted from waste. In the regions, the problem of collection leads to unauthorized landfills. There is a communications problem between central government, local authorities and general public, when legislation norms and requirements are adopted and then an understanding comes in that neither conditions nor infrastructure readiness can handle these legislation initiatives. General public is not well informed on basics of the ecological policy which is only done by non-government organizations, which is definitely not enough. Low utility rates for waste disposal do not meet the basic principle of the environmental policy on minimizing landfills disposal volumes. The lack of a unified system of accounting for transported and disposed wastes and criteria may be a reason for obtaining the distorted data necessary for further quality planning. The prevention and minimization of waste generation is not considered at the legislative level as apriority principle of environmental policy in the field of waste management. Lack of funding and worn out infrastructure does not allow implementing new recycling technologies in full. Copy and paste approach of the EU ecological legislation does not help to resolve problems in Ukraine. Cohesion policy and integration practices of the EU and Ukraine require thorough planning and precise implementation with performance indicators. Ecological integration must be executed in a framework of current legislation considering current local conditions and practices, the infrastructure status, recommendations of non-government organizations and donors as well as EU experience in implementing such a policy. During five years since Ukraine signed Association Agreement with the EU and its member-states a significant progress was made in coherence policy of the waste management system; however dynamics of positive changes are quit low. The Government in cooperation with NGOs, donors and general public is in a good position to develop ecological norms and requirements and successfully implement it to create mechanisms of stimulus and rationale for all actors of the waste management system in line with EU policy guidelines. The author believes that the results of the study could give useful guidelines to students, researchers, people involved in governance, legislation, management and public policy and whose, whom personal and professional interests lie in the area of ecology, environmental protection and waste management.