Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
6558 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Historical social research: HSR-Retrospective (HSR-Retro) = Historische Sozialforschung, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 73-97
ISSN: 2366-6846
This article analyzes the recruitment of CEOs at the 100 largest German companies, focusing on how the transition from "Deutschland AG" to integration with European and global markets has impacted the recruitment and career patterns as well as networks of German CEOs. This study found signs of both continuity and change. The percentage of technically educated German CEOs, as well as CEOs with a Ph.D., continues to be quite high. In contrast, the professionalization of managerial positions in Germany, the decline in corporate tenure, and a gradually opening recruitment market reflect the changing orientation of German corporate culture toward international markets. The analysis of the overall corporate network and its components reveals that the density of the overall corporate network in Germany has increased, which corresponds to the increased number of CEOs with shared alumni experience as well as with additional connections through various policy associations. The density of co-worker networks has, however, decreased. The structure of the German corporate network is not unified but consists of a set of highly dense groups (cliques). The findings and their implications for further research on change in German corporate structures are discussed.
In: Culture and organization: the official journal of SCOS, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 124-138
ISSN: 1477-2760
In: San Diego Law Review, Band 54, Heft 3
SSRN
Working paper
What every leader needs to know about dignity and how to create a culture in which everyone thrives This landmark book from an expert in dignity studies explores the essential but underrecognized role of dignity as part of good leadership. Extending the reach of her award winning book Dignity: Its Essential Role in Resolving Conflict, Donna Hicks now contributes a specific, practical guide to achieving a culture of dignity. Most people know very little about dignity, the author has found, and when leaders fail to respect the dignity of others, conflict and distrust ensue. Hicks highlights three components of leading with dignity: what one must know in order to honor dignity and avoid violating it; what one must do to lead with dignity; and how one can create a culture of dignity in any organization, whether corporate, religious, governmental, healthcare, or beyond. Brimming with key research findings, real life case studies, and workable recommendations, this book fills an important gap in our understanding of how best to be together in a conflict ridden world.
In: [Wiley best practices]
Why is corporate governance important? -- Summary of major corporate governance principles and best practices -- Best practices to monitor risk in different organizational departments -- Monitoring and changing the corporate culture -- The internal audit function -- Compensation committees of public, private and non-profit organizations -- Other committees -- Independent directors and their committees -- IT content best practices -- IT security best practices -- Who can qualify for a public company audit committee? -- Public company audit committee: personal liability of audit committee members -- Minimum responsibilities of public company audit committees -- Other public company audit committee functions -- Thirty best practice considerations for the public company audit committee -- Who is an independent auditor? -- Corporate governance for family-owned and other private businesses -- Corporate governance for non-profit organizations
In: New perspectives on the modern corporation
In: PBFJ-D-23-00373
SSRN
In: Corporate governance: an international review, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 177-179
ISSN: 1467-8683
The authors draw on wide professional experience to address the recent failures in corporate conduct in the United States, the emerging corrective measures and the increasing public outcry for ethical accountability in organisations and governments. They conclude that it is essential that ethics are integral to the culture of an organization; a superficial grafting on of an ethical code will not effect organizational change or encourage public trust.
In: Culture and organization: the official journal of SCOS, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 1477-2760
This chapter defines an integrating role of values in the context of the management culture and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Although similar types of organizational culture predominate in the countries with similar historical, cultural, social and economic characteristics, three levels of values are highlighted, the significance of their integration and management standards oriented towards values congruence is substantiated. The developed axiological prerequisites of corporate social responsibility for managerial changes and the conditions of the formation of the value basis based on the idea of congruence are presented.
BASE
Здійснено спробу соціально-філософського аналізу взаємозв'язку корпоративної культури та суспільства ризику. Розглянуто поняття корпоративної культури та суспільства ризику, досліджено особливості впливу ризиків на корпоративну культуру у суспільстві ризику. Розкрито комплекс критеріїв, за якими можна характеризувати рівень корпоративної культури в умовах суспільства ризику. Осуществляется попытка социально-философского анализа взаимосвязи корпоративной культуры и общества риска. Рассматриваются понятия корпоративной культуры и общества риска, исследуются особенности влияния рисков на корпоративную культуру в обществе риска. Раскрывается комплекс критериев, по которым можно охарактеризовать уровень корпоративной культуры в условиях общества риска. ; In this article was made an attempt to socio-philosophical analysis of the relationship corporate culture and risk society. The concepts of corporate culture and risk society have been considered. The peculiarity of risk influence to the corporate culture of risk society has been investigated. The paper presents a set of criteria by which characterizing the level of corporate culture in risk society. Corporate culture is an important part of modern society. Corporate culture reflects the company's values, norms of behavior of employees in the organization and rules of interaction with external target groups customers, partners and others. It has a significant impact on staff motivation, staff turnover in the organization and, ultimately, the efficiency of the employees. The corporate culture of each organization is unique and individual. It reflects the specifics of the company's business, especially the thinking and behavior of employees. Any changes in the content of corporate culture require considerable effort and a long time for employees to adopt new values and adapt to the new conditions. For example, the continuous development of corporate culture brings first results after 2 years, and the complete conversion of a company culture requires a minimum of 3-10 years. Thus, corporate culture is a risk factor in the company. The development of modern corporations shows that they are constantly developing and function in conditions of risk. The phenomena of corporate culture and risk are closely interrelated. If the corporate culture is weak, it may itself be a source of risk for the company or even lead to a crisis, and vice versa, the risk caused by other factors, may reveal the essence of corporate culture and the nature of declarative values. Thus, corporate culture manifests itself effectively in risk society. «Risk society» is a concept introduced by the German sociologist U. Beck. Risk society is a society that produces technological and social risks. With the development of science and technology the risks not only persist but are produced in even greater numbers. The risks threaten not only the life of the individual, but also society. Risks are not an exceptional case of social life, they are consistently reproduced in economic, political and social spheres of life. So society has to decide. Therefore, the risks are produced not only in business but also in all spheres of society. Therefore, these risks directly affect the corporate culture as part of the social structure. Thus the overall level of corporate culture in a society of risk can be evaluated based on the following criteria: first, the extent to encourage risk; second the degree of orientation to the end result or the means of achieving results; third, the degree of orientation on the needs of the individual or perform tasks; fourth, orientation on individual or group performance forms of work; fifth the level of aggressiveness, encourage competition between employees who work inside the organization and outside it; sixth stability, that is reliability and constant change and the desire for further development. After analyzing some aspects of the risk society, it can be argued that in modern society the risk emerges as a sociocultural development of society. Risk society affects the functioning of the corporate culture. Above the human and collective dominates risk, which forms the basis work. Because the corporate culture is changing, it forces the society as a whole to function in such situations where stereotypes, rules of behavior are absent as in a individually and as a social practice. Corporate culture can influence a person only when she became part of the risk.
BASE
Welcome to Assemble You Audio Learning. In a psychologically safe work environment, people feel free to share ideas, mistakes and criticisms. They worry less about protecting their image and focus more on doing a great job. These are the words of Amy C. Edmondson to Forbes. Edmondson is an economics professor at Harvard University and has been studying the concept of psychological safety since 1999. But what is psychological safety and how can you promote a work environment that prioritizes it? In this track we will explore the concept and study its benefits. Simply put, a psychologically safe work environment is one in which team members feel able to speak up without fear of being judged or criticized. It is an environment that allows people to share their ideas and highlight problems. Learning Objectives: Discover the meaning of psychological safety IExplore the benefits of psychological safety for a company and its people Examine how leaders can begin to increase levels of psychological safety in their organizations.
Cover -- Endorsements -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Part 1 The Essential Science of Scale -- 1 The Science of Positive Change -- 2 Scaling the Sequence -- Part 2 Reset -- 3 Making Space -- 4 Building the Frame -- Part 3 Ignite -- 5 Discovering Insight -- 6 Leading Through Questions -- 7 Activating Organisational Purpose -- Part 4 Fuel -- 8 Introducing Rituals -- 9 Practicing the Triggers -- 10 Inspiring Performance -- Conclusion -- Index.