This book looks at the interplay between criminal law and other branches of public law pursuing similar objectives (referred to as 'quasi-criminal law'). The need for clarifying the concepts and the interlink between criminal and quasi-criminal enforcement is a topic attracting a lot of discussion and debate in both academia and practice across Europe (and beyond). This volume adds to this debate by bringing to light the substantive and procedural problems stemming from the current parallel or dual use of the different enforcement systems. The collection draws on expertise from academia, practice and policy; its high-quality analysis will appeal to scholars, practitioners and policymakers alike.
Leaf from a Spanish legal manuscript. The manuscript was begun in Seville in 1604 and finished in 1641 in Mexico City. The vellum manuscript was begun by Alonso Perez, notary public of Santa Maria at the request of Alonso Lopez de Luna of Seville whose son Alonso de fonte Luna who was then in the public prison of Puerto de Santa Maria facing a charge of murder. His father (Alonso Lopez de Luna) hired Perez to demonstrate the noble lineage of the family in order to enjoy the judicial privileges of nobility. The page contains a large illuminated E and elaborate bordering, with initials in gold leaf. This document was once part of the library of the secretary of Maximilian I of Mexico (6 July 1832 - 19 June 1867).
1 sheet ([1] p.). ; Last complete line of text ends "that". ; Other title information from first 4 lines of text. ; "Yeuen at her hyghnesse Palyce at Westminster, the xxiii. day of December." ; "Cum priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis." ; Reproduction of original in: Society of Antiquaries.
Signature: 5B⁴. ; "Die jovis, 20 September. 1649. Ordered by the Commons assembled in Parliament, that this act be forthwith printed and published. Hen: Scobell, cleric. Parliament." ; Title within double line border; head piece; initial; black letter. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; MU: Pre-1801 imprint.
Defence date: 21 September 2020 (Online) ; Examining Board: Pr. Loïc Azoulai (Sciences-Po Paris, Directeur de thèse); Pr. Olivier Beaud (Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas, Co-directeur de thèse); Pr. Xavier Pin (Université Jean Moulin, Lyon 3); Pr. Christoph Schönberger (Université de Constance) ; Awarded the 2021 Prix Dalloz ; Awarded the 2021 Best Thesis Prize in the category "Concepts fondamentaux du droit constitutionnel" from the "Institut francophone pour la Justice et la Démocratie" Louis Joinet (previously the 'Fondation Varenne') ; Il est d'usage de considérer que la citoyenneté étatique, en tant qu'elle désigne une appartenance statutaire, est un concept de clôture qui implique l'inclusion aussi bien que l'exclusion. À rebours de la littérature dominante sur la citoyenneté en droit qui privilégie généralement sa dimension inclusive, cette thèse entreprend un renversement de perspective : elle se propose de théoriser la citoyenneté en creux, à partir de ses exclus, de définir autrement dit le citoyen par le non-citoyen. L'exclu étudié en droit français n'est pas la figure paradigmatique de l'étranger, mais celle du criminel déchu de ses droits politiques à la suite d'une condamnation pénale. Nous faisons l'hypothèse de la valeur heuristique d'une étude proprement juridique et non normative de la notion constitutionnelle de citoyenneté à partir du droit pénal en général, et des sanctions privant le condamné de ses droits de citoyen en particulier. L'apport de cette recherche est double : il concerne à titre premier la citoyenneté dont on entend examiner les bénéficiaires, la nature (les valeurs) et le contenu matériel (les droits et les devoirs). Nous démontrons (1) que par différence avec la nationalité, la citoyenneté a historiquement une dimension axiologique et qu'elle protège la moralité publique. Cette affirmation semble de prime abord remise en cause aujourd'hui en raison de l'influence du droit des droits de l'homme sur la matière. Plus qu'à la substitution d'un modèle de citoyenneté à un autre, nous établissons (2) que l'on a affaire à une tension au cœur du régime actuel de la citoyenneté. À titre second, nous contribuons en filigrane à une lecture de la démocratie en soutenant (1) que la lutte pour les droits politiques des derniers exclus de la nation (les condamnés et les « aliénés ») correspond moins à une revendication de participation politique qu'à une demande d'inclusion sociale ; (2) que le citoyen, dans cette lutte, tend à disparaître derrière le sujet de droit doté de droits opposables.
[110], 104, [3], 76 p. ; "The second part of A seasonable, legal and historical vindication, and chronological collection of the good old fundamental liberties, franchises, rights, lawes, government of all English freemen" has special t.p. and separate paging. ; Signature N5 is missing in the filmed copy. Signatures M'-N4 photographed from University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus). Library copy and are inserted at the end. ; Errata: p. [3] at beginning. ; Reproduction of original in Yale University Library. ; Imperfect: film lacks 2nd pt.
In its 2009 decision in Infopaq (C-5/08), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) achieved a landmark result: the de facto, horizontal harmonization of the originality requirement. After that, nothing could stay the same. After providing an overview of the harmonization process in the copyright field over the past 30 years or so and, with that, the environment in which Infopaq came to be, this chapter considers Infopaq and the expansive effect of subsequent case law on other copyright subsistence requirements. The analysis also notes how the eventual outcome of Cofemel (C-683/17), insofar as works of applied art are concerned, is perfectly in line with such a jurisprudence. The chapter further considers the legal and institutional difficulties that such a string of CJEU decisions has given rise to and is yet to resolve before concluding that further questions are likely to be posed to the CJEU in the not too distant future. In other words: the construction of EU copyright is far from over.
8 p. ; Signed at end by 36 prisoners, the first being: William Smith. ; Place of publication from Wing. ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "June. 18". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
1 sheet ([1] p.). ; Formerly STC 7919. Line 1 of text ends "late". Space for the cut of second coin left blank, with cut from 7920 pasted over ms. "apologie". ; Other title information from first 3 lines of text. ; "Anno 1560. 2. Novembris. The seconde yere of her Maiesties raigne." ; "Cum priuilegio Regiæ Maiestatis." ; Reproduction of original in: British Library.
This article proposes a constitutional approach of the role of Government in Economy, and the principle of subsidiarity in the 1993 Peruvian Constitution. The proposal discusses the generally accepted notion of promotion in Public Law, as a reference to establish when Government can develop business activity within the framework of the 1993 Constitution. The discussion adopts the point of view of the Public Law to analyze the principle of subsidiarity of Government when it comes to developing business. ; El artículo propone una interpretación constitucional del rol promotor del Estado y del principio de subsidiariedad en la Constitución de 1993, sobre la base de la noción de fomento, generalmente aceptada por la doctrina, como criterio para establecer cuándo puede el Estado desarrollar actividad empresarial en el marco de la Carta Magna vigente. El análisis se desarrolla desde el punto de vista del derecho público y utiliza para ello el enfoque horizontal1 del principio de subsidiariedad.
1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Dated at end: White-hall, the sixt day of April, in the one and twentieth yeere of our raigne . ; Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery.
1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Place and date of publication suggested by Wing. ; At end: "Signed in the name, and by order of the Councel of State, appointed by authority of Parliament." ; Reproduction of original in Bodleian Library.
