Unauthorised use of the trademark logo on social media on a massive scale has led to frequent legal conflicts between trademark holders, social media providers and internet users and legal uncertainty. The thesis concludes that trademark infringement and dilution laws in the U.S. and EU are inadequate to solve this problem. The trademark logo on social media should be protected against unauthorised use, even though it is not used to sell the good or service the trademark indicates, but is used in a commercial environment. Two premises for any solution are that first the enforcement should be made automatic, since litigation on a case-by-case basis is not scalable, and second that the safe harbour provisions for online service providers, that aggravate the problem, should be substituted for strict liability. The trademark logo can be seen as the personification of the trademark holder, and one can argue that the stability of the trademark logo is not only in the interest of the trademark holder but also of society at large. One can argue that trademark dilution already provides a kind of moral right of integrity for the trademark logo. However, this right is limited to trademark logos that are considered famous or have a reputation, and, moreover, that are used in a commercial way. This thesis argues that also the trademark logo that did not reach the requested level of fame or reputation and is used in a non-commercial way should also be protected against unauthorised use on social media. Therefore the moral right of integrity is proposed for the trademark logo. Until the law will be amended to include a moral right of integrity for the trademark logo, this thesis suggests to implement proactive solutions in the walled gardens of social media as a testing ground for potential legislation. This automated solution is scalable, makes intellectual property protection and enforcement not only effective but also more calibratable to social policy goals and will inevitable lead to an algorithmic justice. ...
Ulrich Manthe, der seit mehr als 30 Jahren an der Universität Passau als Professor für Bürgerliches Recht und Römisches Recht wirkt und 2017 seinen 70. Geburtstag feiert, wird mit dieser, von seinen Schülern verfassten Festschrift geehrt. Diese trägt den Titel "Itineraria iuris", denn Wegbeschreibungen des Rechts waren es, die Ulrich Manthe in seinen unvergessenen Vorlesungen bot. Seine beiden großen Interessensgebiete, das römische und das chinesische Recht, deren wissenschaftliche Durchdringung er entscheidend geprägt hat, spiegeln sich in den Beiträgen der Festschrift wider. Ulrich Manthe hat nicht nur eine Vielzahl von Veröffentlichungen zum römischen Recht vorzuweisen, genannt seien nur seine allseits bekannten Studien zu den Institutionen des Gaius, sondern auch zahlreiche Publikationen zum chinesischen Recht und zur chinesischen Sprache und Kultur. Die Bandbreite der Festschriftbeiträge reicht vom römischen Erbrecht über den gutgläubigen Erwerb nach chinesischem Recht bis hin zur Insolvenzanfechtung nach der InsO. / "Itineraria iuris – From Rome to China. Essays in honour of Ulrich Manthe on the occasion of his seventieth birthday" -- This Festschrift honours Ulrich Manthe, who celebrates his 70th birthday in 2017. Both of his great areas of interest, i.e. Roman law and the law of China, which he has decisively shaped through a large number of publications and through his highly respected teachings, are mirrored by the contributions to the Festschrift. The breadth of the Festschrift chapters reaches from legal history to sino-legal topics and aspects of current German law
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
TULISAN ini merupakan permenungan atas realitas yang memperhinakan peradaban bangsa. Korupsi merayapi seluruh koordinat institusi negara yang jumawah kuasa dengan harta dan tahtah. Khalayak menyaksikan betapa korupsi menjadi produk keserakahan "modal maupun otoritas legal" yang menjalar di tubuh negara. Simaklah korupsi yang diungkap KPK selama ini, termasuk korupsi sektor: pertambangan, layanan umum, e-KTP, serta para penikmat dana BLBI, adalah orang-orang yang berbilang "sang kuasa" kapital. Kasus skandal BLBI yang "naik-turun" pengungkapannya, dana pungut dan sogokan yang melintas di pojok-pojok "terminal" kota, serta transaksi sumber daya alam di bumi Papua yang belum tergoyahkan, sungguh telah membelalakkan mata publik.
在过去十年间里,中国立法机关及政府机关已制定颁布了大量新的法律法规。这些法律从数量和质量上而言,和过去相比都有了很大飞跃,公司法和证券法领域尤为如此。 法律从业人员数量的增多满足了人们多元化的法律需求。财经媒体的迅速发展使得大众对商业和市场运行、以及相关法律法规产生了更加深刻的认识。 然而,这些方面的改善并不意味着中国上市公司小股东保护也得到了相应的加强。 ; 本文主要围绕以下三部分内容进行了探讨:1.中国现行法律下规制小股东保护的法律原则及规则;2.从政治环境的角度分析政治对部分规则形成的影响以及一些规则在实践中未能达到其立法旨意的原因;及3.小股东积极通过诉讼保护自身权利的现状及困境。作者评估了法律在小股东保护方面的实际效果,并分析中国的当代政治对法律达到其原本立法旨意的影响。虽然保护小股东及上市公司治理的法律框架已越来越全面,但实践中,小股东通过诉讼途径来有效实现自身权利却仍困境重重。本文认为,法院拒绝受理针对政治背景深厚的公司提起的诉讼、小股东面临的举证困难、法院收取的高额诉讼费用等因素都是小股东在实践中所要克服的障碍。 ; 本文认为,影响众多中国上市公司治理的最大问题以及小股东通过诉讼途径保护自身权益的最大障碍正是党国体制对经济活动的干预,尤其是对于部分上市公司和法律程序的干预。为论证该观点,文本首先分析了党国是如何参与并影响中国上市公司的治理。文章发现,党组织在那些由国家直接或间接控股的上市公司发挥了重要的决策及监督作用。此外,文章还分析了民营性质的上市公司是如何受到地方政府的干预。文章认为,针对上市公司的政治干预消弱了法律治理的作用,同时也损害了小股东的合法权益。为了实现对小股东的保护,法律不但要保护小股东不受私权的侵犯(比如私人或私人实体对小股东作出的欺诈或不当行为),更重要的是保护小股东权利不受到来自党国体制默许、支持、甚至实际参与的行为的侵犯。 ; In the past decade, China has experienced an exponential increase in the quantity and quality of new laws and regulations promulgated by the state and its agencies, especially in the area of company law and securities regulation. The legal profession grows and provides ever more diversified services to a public, whose awareness of business and market practices, as well as to some extent the legal rules and principles governing these, are being strengthened by the burgeoning financial media. Yet, these improvements do not necessarily translate into better protection for minority shareholders of Chinese listed companies. ; This thesis discusses the legal rules and principles governing minority shareholders' protection, the political realities that have shaped some of the rules and, as argued here, threaten to undermine some of the principles, and minority shareholders' activism to enforce their rights through litigation. The author has sought to test how law functions in the area of minority shareholder protection and how political practice affects the functioning of law in this area. While the legal framework for minority shareholders' protection and for the corporate governance of Chinese listed companies is becoming increasingly ...
This paper aims at promoting prospective Intellectual Property (IP) securitization as a feasible mode of financing creative industries demanding instant capital to operate, develop products and promote market expansion. The proposed approach is dedicated to accelerate new financial sources of support to strengthen and develop creativity and productivity in the creative industries. The current paper introduces a new legal institution which is not regulated yet under Indonesia's positive laws. It shows how creative companies might use the institution to gain direct and indirect benefits. It is acknowledged that this proposal may spark challenges at the doctrinal, normative and practical levels. At the doctrinal level, the potential for challenge refers to the philosophical issue related to exclusive rights doctrine. At the normative level, the challenges are caused by the absence of regulation concerning IP securitization in Indonesia influencing the validity and viability of IP securitization transactions. At the practical level, this proposal may not guarantee the certainty of IP valuation as a unique asset involving complex procedures, interdisciplinary laws, profesionals and so forth. In order to overcome the doctrinal challenge, this paper offers relevant principles which may function to balance the acceleration of IP securitization as a new financing mechanism for creativity and prevent unrestricted exploitation of IP exclusive rights. For addressing any normative and practical challenges, this work promotes the need for government involvement in developing and promoting IP securitization by providing economic and legal frameworks, started by enactment of IP securitization regulation and the establishment of infrastructures for IP securitization
A lack of proper interpretation of Decentralisatie Van Het Onderwijs or education decentralization in practice has led to confusion in understanding the legal aspects of education decentralization to oversee the targeted acculturation of Indonesian citizens. Decentralisation Van Het Onderwijs, a Dutch education reform law, was the impetus for this study, which seeks to shed light on the role that decentralization plays in the process of cultural assimilation. Through an examination of the decentralization concept associated with Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning regional government, the legal meaning of education decentralization is determined. Of primary importance is creating an educational framework, which includes teaching student's values such as morality and respect for others. This framework can only be established through a well-resourced educational system. When it comes to education, moral training, character development, and social responsibility are all part of formal education. Only traditional religious schools, such as pesantren, can provide all of this information.
Indonesia's marine territory has become a big challenge for the Government of Indonesia to manage it. Nowadays, Indonesian marine has lot of regulation in the sea. But it's cannot prevent the basic interest of all people that earnings life from there. A lot of migrant has been smuggled in and by Indonesian's marine territory. The main concerns that arouse are: how should government give an equation for Indonesian migrant workers that are smuggled and how should the government put migrant workers protection to supply the equation for them. These questions will solve by a normative juridical study on the protection of natural resources and the resources of Indonesian fisherman. The study uses normative legal research which elaborated with conceptual approach from numbers of regulations that apply in marine labor law and employment law. This research is also complemented by a literature approach in the form of Indonesian legal literature and marine journals to address the issues raised in this paper. The findings in practice prove that the government should give more attention for the fisherman's welfare and protection related to fish catching. The objective protection for Indonesian marine resources is from regulated all the regulation to develop Indonesia economic from Maritime sector. It is all needed to make a new system in legal protection for Fisherman and Marine Resources in Indonesia.
Undang-Undang No. l Tahun 1974 In people's lives there is still a frequent way of marriage which is a violation of Law , especially article 2 paragraph 2, namely: "Each marriage is recorded according to the applicable laws and regulations". The definition of violation in the law, known as siri marriage. In this case the law must be understood as a set of rules governing, controlling society. Law in this sense is not part of the community system, but control of the community system. Law in this sense is not part of the community system, but control of the community system. According to Gustav Radbruch law must contain three basic values, namely: 1. Value of justice (philosophical aspect). The validity of the law is justified on the basis of human philosophical beliefs. 2. Value of certainty (juridical aspect). The law is enforced because it is determined by the state (gemeenschap), namely by the government and the people's representative council. 3. Value of benefits (sociological aspects). The validity of the law is due to social reality (society as a whole). In a sociological and philosophical view, siri marriage is relatively acceptable to the community, but judicially cannot be justified because it will have an impact on the low legal awareness of the community. Marriage recording does not determine the validity of a marriage, but only states that the marriage event actually happened, so it is merely administrative. Thus, the marriage is legitimate because it is carried out in accordance with religious law but has a weakness, namely the absence of a recording as referred to in article 2 paragraph 2 of Undang-Undang No. l Tahun 1974 . In reality the registration of marriages brought more good than bad in living in a society, so carrying out the registration of the marriage would be in line and not in conflict with religious norms
Penal mediation is an alternative form of settlement of cases outside the court by prioritizing the principle of resortative justice which aims to achieve justice that is oriented towards improving the relationship between perpetrators and victims. This study aims to examine how the implementation and the obstacles faced by the Makassar City Police in conducting penal mediation in the settlement of minor theft cases. This research is a normative empirical research with a qualitative analysis approach. The result of the research obtained is that the implementation of penal mediation by the Makassar City Police in resolving minor theft cases is carried out based on police discretion as regulated by Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia and Circular No. SE / 8 / VII / 2018 dated 27 July 2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases. The circular regulates how to apply the concept of restorative justice in solving criminal cases at the level of investigation or investigation in the police, while in its implementation there are still obstacles faced by the Makassar City Police, including emotional factors, namely the existence of selfishness between the perpetrator or victim justifying oneself and blaming the opposing party and financial (economic) factors, namely the inconsistency between the victim and the perpetrator to make peace, especially in matters of compensation.
Ormas, which are familiarly referred to as community organizations, are organizations that exist and are formed from the community voluntarily based on the same needs, interests, common aspirations, activities and goals in participating in development for the sake of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. The purposes of this study are to reveal the scope of government authority in the dissolution of civil society organizations in Indonesia and the mechanism for the dissolution of civil society organizations in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used in the form of secondary and primary legal sources through recording and documentation studies in which legal materials and data are managed using interpretive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the scope of government authority in the dissolution of community organizations is based on the attribution authority. Regarding the mechanism for dissolving community organizations, it refers to the provisions of Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning Ormas. The author suggests that the government always conduct socialization and supervision related to the activities of community organizations so that the community and mass organizations must be guided by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Pancasila because it is the most important principle in establishing community organizations.
In the perspective of environmental law, welfare which is the political goal of national law is not enough to be based only on the rule of law and democracy, but must also be based on the principles of the utilization of natural resources and environmental management. The principle must be a direction and policy making in the implementation of development, otherwise the welfare achieved will not last long, because Natural Resources as one of the elements of development capital cannot be functioned sustainable. Based on these arguments, conceptually the concept of implementing natural resource utilization and environmental management is the most important thing in national development that has been outlined in the legal policies set by the state or government to achieve the goals and objectives of environmental management. The goals and objectives are so that the environment is not damaged or polluted and maintained its function is preserved to preserve the carrying capacity and environmental capacity in order to achieve national development goals. If this function is not carried out properly, then the environment will be damaged or polluted, natural resources will be increasingly depleted, which in turn people's welfare which is one of the country's goals will not be achieved and sustainable.
AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI ; AbstrakSNI merupakan bentuk nyata keinginan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada konsumen. UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen tidak menyatakan secara jelas standar dan syarat yang harus dipenuhi pelaku usaha pengaturan hukum perlindungan konsumen terhadap produk SNI wajib dalam perundang-undangan di Indonesia, pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI, dan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dengan menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen melalui SNI wajib megacu kepada Undang Undang No. 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Pengaturan standardisasi wajib juga dapat ditemukan di dalam UU Nomor 3 tahun 2014 tentang Perindustrian dan UU Nomor 7 tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Pada dasarnya, UU Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian merupakan derivatif dari Pasal 9 ayat 1 huruf (a) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha terhadap produk yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban SNI adalah mengacu pada pertanggungjawaban produk (product liability). Pelaku usaha dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata dengan memberikan ganti rugi kepada konsumen dengan merujuk kepada Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen berkenaan dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen Air Minum Dalam Kemasan (AMDK) dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 sudah tepat sebab berdasarkan fakta yang terungkap dipersidangan dan ternyata air minum dalam kemasan Merek Sanford dapat dimanfaatkan oleh konsumen baik dikonsumsi maupun dijual kepada pihak lain dan konsumen telah mendapatkan manfaatnya serta konsumen mendapatkan keterangan informasi yang benar, jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang, yang diperdagangkan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Pelaku Usaha, SNI. AbstractSNI is a tangible form of the government's desire to provide protection to consumers. UU no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection does not clearly state the standards and requirements that must be met by business actors, regulating consumer protection laws for mandatory SNI products in Indonesian legislation, business actors' accountability for products that do not meet SNI obligations, and legal protection efforts for consumers. Bottled Drinking Water (AMDK) by analyzing the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020. Legal protection for consumers through SNI must refer to Law no. 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment. Mandatory standardization arrangements can also be found in Law number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry and Law number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. Basically, the Law on Standardization and Conformity Assessment is a derivative of Article 9 paragraph 1 letter (a) of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The responsibility of business actors for products that do not meet SNI obligations refers to product liability. Business actors can be held civilly responsible by providing compensation to consumers by referring to the Consumer Protection Act regarding the losses incurred. Legal protection for bottled drinking water (AMDK) consumers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 501 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020 is correct because based on the facts revealed in court and it turns out that drinking water in the Sanford brand can be used by consumers, both consumed and consumed. sold to other parties and consumers have benefited and consumers have received correct, clear and honest information regarding the condition of the goods being traded. Keywords: Accountability, Business Actor, SNI
