Suchergebnisse

Alternatif uyuşmazlık çözüm yolları, onarıcı adalet kavramının ortaya çıkmasıyla uygulanmaya başlamıştır. Bunlardan biri uzlaşma kurumudur. Günümüzdeki anlamıyla ilk olarak Kanada'da 28 Mayıs 1974 tarihinde meydana gelen bir olayda uygulanmıştır. Uzlaşma kurumunun ortaya çıkmasının çeşitli sebepleri vardır. Bunlardan en önemlisi klasik ceza adalet sistemlerinin uyuşmazlığın taraflarını, özellikle de mağduru tatmin etmemesidir. Uzlaşma kurumu ülkemizde ilk olarak 1 Haziran 2005 tarihinde yürürlüğe giren 5237 sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu ve 5271 sayılı Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu'nda yer alan düzenlemeler ile uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. Uyuşmazlığın taraflarının özgür iradelerine dayanan uzlaşma kurumunun mağdur veya suçtan zarar gören bakımından, şüpheli veya sanık bakımından, toplum bakımından, yargı organlarının iş yükü bakımından ve kamu harcamaları bakımından birçok faydası bulunmaktadır. Tezimiz iki ana bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde, uzlaşma kavramı, uzlaşma kavramının hukuki niteliği, alternatif çözüm yöntemleri ve onarıcı adalet kavramlarını ve bunların ortaya çıkış sebepleri, uzlaşmanın karşılaştırmalı hukuktaki ve uluslar arası belgelerdeki yeri inceleme konusu yapılmıştır. İkinci bölümde ise, uzlaşmanın koşullarını, Yüksek Yargı içtihatları doğrultusunda soruşturma ve kovuşturma aşamasındaki uygulanma sürecini, olumlu ve olumsuz sonuçlarını, faydalarını incelemeye çalıştık. Çalışmamızı, uzlaşma kurumu konusunda genel bir değerlendirme yaparak sonlandırdık. ; Alternative dispute resolution methods, with the emergence of the concept of restorative justice, began to be implemented. One of these is mediation institution. Meaning today as the first in Canada on May 28, 1974 was implemented in an event occurring. There are the various reasons for the emergence of mediation institutions. Most importantly, classic criminal justice system does not satisfy the parties to the dispute, particularly the victims. Mediation institution in our country was introduced by the regulations of the No. 5237 Turkish Penal Code and No. 5271 the Criminal Procedure Code which came into force on 1 June 2005. Mediation institution which based on the free will of the parties to the dispute has many benefits in terms of the person who has suffered damages from the crime, in terms of the suspect or the accused, in terms of the society, in terms of courts? workloads and in terms of public expenditure. Our study is composed of two main sections. At the first chapter, the concept of mediation, legal character of mediation, alternative dispute resolution methods and restorative justice concepts and their emergence causes, its places in the comparative law and on intirnational documents had been expressed. And at the second chapter, the rules of the mediation, in accordance with high judicial case law, the implementation process of the mediation at the investigation stage and prosecution stage, positive and negative results of mediation, the benefits of mediation had been expressed. At the final section, We had terminated our study making an overall assessment about the the concept of mediation with examples of decisions which we made at the practice.

Freedom from arrest -- Parliamentary elections -- Parliamentary wages -- The process of statutory regulation -- The royal courts and their procedures -- The texts -- Documents relating to parliamentary privilege -- Documents relating to parliamentary elections -- Documents relating to the payment of members of parliament

"The European Union is today a major player in many policy areas, going from classic economic fields as competition policy, agriculture and fisheries policy to new emergent fields as environmental policy, arterial intelligence policy, security and foreign policy and criminal justice policy. These policies comes with an increasing level of EU regulation, having also a substantive impact on the harmonization of national policies and regulations. This expansion of EU competence naturally also places new demands on their enforcement, especially when it comes to investigations with the aim of imposing punitive administrative and/or criminal sanctions. In this expanded version of his valedictory lecture Prof. Vervaele is assessing 1) to what extent the EU and its Member States have a policy on punitive enforcement in the internal market and in the Area of Freedom Security and Justice and 2) how this policy translates into the harmonization of substantive administrative and criminal law and procedural law at the national level and into the elaboration of administrative and judicial cooperation instruments and the setting up of European enforcement agencies. The assessment includes to what extent this policy takes account of the human rights obligations. Vervaele concludes with a plea for a European model for punitive law enforcement with an increased alignment between the administrative enforcement tools in the internal market and the criminal enforcement tools in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. In this model the national enforcement authorities are build in under a network cooperation scheme."--

Preliminary Material /T.G. Leesen -- Introduction /T.G. Leesen -- I. Male Puberty /T.G. Leesen -- II. Res Mancipi /T.G. Leesen -- III. Specificatio /T.G. Leesen -- IV. Filius Praeteritus /T.G. Leesen -- V. Legatum Per Vindicationem (1) /T.G. Leesen -- VI. Legatum Per Vindicationem (2) /T.G. Leesen -- VII. Legatum Per Praeceptionem /T.G. Leesen -- VIII. Datio Tutoris /T.G. Leesen -- IX. Regula Catoniana /T.G. Leesen -- X. In Iure Cessio Hereditatis /T.G. Leesen -- XI. Condicio Impossibilis /T.G. Leesen -- XII. Stipulatio For A Third Person /T.G. Leesen -- XIII. Literal Contract /T.G. Leesen -- XIV. Emptio Venditio (1) /T.G. Leesen -- XV. Emptio Venditio (2) /T.G. Leesen -- XVI. Mandatum /T.G. Leesen -- XVII. Servus Communis /T.G. Leesen -- XVIII. Datio In Solutum /T.G. Leesen -- XIX. Novatio /T.G. Leesen -- XX. Actio Noxalis /T.G. Leesen -- XXI. Noxae Deditio /T.G. Leesen -- Conclusion /T.G. Leesen -- Appendix 1. Pomp., D. 1.2.2.47–53: Text And Translation /T.G. Leesen -- Appendix 2. The Leaders Of The Schools /T.G. Leesen -- Appendix 3. The Sabinians And The Proculians: Topoi /T.G. Leesen -- Bibliography /T.G. Leesen -- Source Index /T.G. Leesen.

Which rights and obligations arise from the EU principle prohibiting unjust enrichment? This is the first publication to thoroughly examine the consequences this principle has - or may have - for private law relationships. An illuminating analysis, bearing both academic and practical importance. As the interplay between EU law and national private law intensifies, the question arises how the EU principle prohibiting unjust enrichment plays into various legal relationships involving one or more individuals. Unjust enrichment in European Union law takes a pioneering step in addressing this pressing issue. The author puts forward a compelling analysis, taking into account the functions of unjust enrichment in a number of national law systems and the functions of general principles of EU law, as well as case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. For analytic purposes, links are identified between EU causes of action based on undue payment, unjust enrichment and unlawful act, respectively. This is followed by a discussion whether or not such actions should be founded on violation of an EU provision having direct (horizontal) effect. Insight into the possible consequences of the EU principle prohibiting unjust enrichment has both academic and practical importance. The reader gains a deeper understanding of how the Court of Justice may further develop EU law on the basis of private-law principles. The study illuminates which rights individuals may derive from such legal principles and - if they can do so - under which circumstances