Suchergebnisse

In order to carry out the crime prevention and control policy, there are two ways thatcan be carried out, namely the use of penal facilities or criminal (legal) sanctions,and the use of other facilities (nonpenal). Thus the use of criminal (legal) sanctions isone of the policies in criminal politics, which in this case is not a means that occupiesa strategic position and causes many problems. Moreover, if it is associated with theuse of criminal sanctions to achieve the purpose of prevention as one of the premise ofabolitionist understanding. As a means of law enforcement policy in order to controlcrime, the use of criminal (legal) sanctions is not an absolute. Even if it will be used,then the problem is the policy of its use must be rational by paying attention to thehumanistic approach and social interests that contain certain values that need to beprotected. As a criminal policy, the extreme attitude to eliminate criminal (legal)sanctions is not a policy step. Because what needs to be done in policies to controland overcome crime is an integrated approach between penal and non-formalpolicies. This non-formal activity occupies a key and strategic position that must beintensified and streamlined in controlling and overcoming crime, not eliminatingcriminal law.

The issue of political dowry, relatively, becomes a sustainable warning of problems in every general election in Indonesia. Such as the issue of Sandiaga Uno, who provided political dowry in the 2019 presidential election. The allegation was started by the Deputy of General-secretary of the Party of Democrat, Andi Arief, who stated that Sandiaga Uno had provided 500 billion rupiahs to PAN and PKS respectively so that those two parties would support him to nominate as the Candidate of Vice President for Prabowo Subianto. Political dowry has been a serious issue and almost constantly becomes an interesting topic to be reported and studied in every general election. Although it is popular, the issue of political dowry is a case that is relatively difficult to prove its truth (court decisions). In fact, explicitly, political dowry has been regulated in Article 228 on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning the General Election (Election Law). However, it does not expressly provide a deterrent effect to the political dowry actors. This reality becomes the basis of encouragement in conducting this research. The theory used in this research is legal politics and law enforcement. While the method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The output of this paper is that the handling of political dowry cases in the presidential election needs a serious concern. And then, the regulation on sanctions, which still be administrative in nature, against the actors of political dowry in the Election Law is considered to be inappropriate. So that criminal policy is needed to strengthen the law enforcement and strict legal instruments against criminal acts of political dowry in the future election (ius constituendum).

ABSTRACTBased on Law No. 4 of 2009 Article 1 Paragraph (7) related to mining business licenses.Many illegal mining companies do not have permission to operate in Padang PariamanRegency. The problems raised in this study are (1) What factors influence the number ofillegal C mining excavators in Padang Pariaman Regency? (2) How is the non-reasoningeffort by the Padang Pariaman Regional Police in overcoming the crime of illegal C miningexcavation in Padang Pariaman Regency? (3) What is the non-reasoning policy that shouldbe carried out by the Padang Pariaman Regional Police to overcome the mining of illegal Cexcavations in Padang Pariaman Regency? This study useed a sociolegalapproach. the dataused were primary data and secondary data, collected by means of interviews and documentstudies, analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that the factors that cause illegalmining are economic factors, the perpetrators want to avoid the obligations that have beendetermined, the difficulty of obtaining a Mining Business License, the lack of socialization oflaws and regulations, and weak law enforcement. Second; The non-reasoning efforts carriedout by the Police in overcoming illegal rock mining are preventive by carrying out patrols,raids, routine security operations and providing socialization to the public about theimportance of creating security and ways to overcome illegal mining by placing banners /pamphlets. Non-criminal policy towards illegal / illegal mining crimes is to actively involvethe Nagari government and customary institutions in policy making at the Nagari level todeal with illegal mining by making nagari regulations.