Suchergebnisse

Yau, Sin Yee Christine. ; "November 2010." ; Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 210-229). ; Abstracts in English and Chinese. ; Abstract --- p.i ; Acknowledge --- p.iii ; Chapter 1. --- Introduction --- p.1 ; Background: --- p.6 ; What is Demeanor? --- p.6 ; What is Resistance? --- p.8 ; Who are they? --- p.9 ; Chapter - --- Heunggongyahn --- p.9 ; Chapter - --- Daaihlohkyahn --- p.10 ; Chapter - --- Gwailou --- p.11 ; Research Significance --- p.12 ; Literature Review: --- p.13 ; Demeanor: Cultural Knowledge --- p.14 ; Demeanor: Embodiment and Presentation of Cultural Identities --- p.16 ; Politicizing Demeanor: Struggling for Power and Conveying Messages --- p.17 ; Hong Kong Identity: Its Shaping Process --- p.19 ; Methodology: --- p.21 ; Entering the Field: Daily Observation --- p.21 ; Pilot Test --- p.22 ; "In-depth, Semi-structured, and Structured Interviews" --- p.23 ; Participant Observation --- p.24 ; Organization of the Thesis --- p.25 ; Informants' Details --- p.28 ; Chapter 2. --- Heunggongyahn and Daaihlohkyahn --- p.30 ; Introduction --- p.30 ; "Pride: Certain Demeanor as ""Superior"" Prestige" --- p.31 ; The Prestige in Not Disturbing Others --- p.32 ; "The Prestige in Sitting ""Properly"": Preserving City's Image" --- p.34 ; "The Prestige in Having Gungdaksam, Public Virtue" --- p.41 ; The Prestige in Keeping some Distance from Strangers --- p.43 ; The Prestige in Endurance and Keeping Quiet: Saving Face --- p.44 ; "Prejudice: Certain Demeanor as ""Inferior"" Stigma" --- p.47 ; The Stigma of Squatting --- p.48 ; The Stigma of Public Excretion --- p.56 ; The Stigma of Nose Picking --- p.62 ; The Stigma of Spitting --- p.63 ; Conclusion --- p.67 ; Chapter 3. --- My Informants' Everyday Life --- p.69 ; Introduction --- p.69 ; "The Civilizing Process: Demeanor as a ""Linear Evolution""" --- p.70 ; "Using Seat-Toilets ""Properly""" --- p.71 ; Lining up --- p.76 ; Demeanor as Capital --- p.81 ; Cultural Capital --- p.81 ; Symbolic Capital ...

Mass Communication and Media play an integral part in modern societies. This publication reflects on fundamental theoretical works and recent key texts from different backgrounds such as political analysis, feminism, media studies or Cultural Theory. It is designed as a workbook in European-Chinese intercultural studies. Therefore thorough descriptions of the texts in Chinese language are backed up by additional information and questions to ponder to deepen the understanding. This book is part of the series "interKULTUR European-Chinese intercultural Studies" which consists of teaching material for intercultural studies in higher education and research results of such studies.

The article presents the main data on the situation with the digitization of heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data in Lithuania in 2011. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Communication of Vilnius University when implementing the project Development of the National Network of Infrastructure of Lithuanian Studies Scientific Research and Heritage: the Design Phase financed by the Research Council of Lithuania. The digitization of cultural heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data has been going on in Lithuania for already more than 15 years. During that time, near 100 different information infrastructures have been developed. Most of scientific data are digitized by the Institute of the Lithuanian Language, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, Vilnius University, Vytautas Magnus University and Kaunas University of Technology. From the quantitative point of view, the number of IS controlled by a memory institution is less, but this is determined by a higher concentration and level of strategic management in this sector, which is supervised by the Ministry of Culture. The environmental analysis has shown that the strategic priority given to the scientific research of Lithuanian studies, digitization of their scientific data, heritage data and the legal, political, financial, technological, institutional environment in Lithuania are favourable. There is no factor or reason to be singled out for its strongest influence on the development of infrastructures in Lithuania, because their development is determined by the totality of interrelated factors. When assessing systematically, it was established that the creation and development of the network of Lithuanian studies infrastructure would be most greatly influenced by institutional, technological and function distribution factors; legal and administrative factors would influence them less, while the influence of economic and social factors would be the least. An important source of problems in the digitization of heritage and scientific data of Lithuanian studies in Lithuania is the fact that these sciences, scientific institutions and their infrastructures are supervised by the Ministry of Culture and Science, whereas the memory institutions and information infrastructures of the most important sources (heritage) are in the competence of the Ministry of Culture. Therefore, the creation of specialized information systems and databases in research and memory institutions is almost non-coordinated, and the interoperability of created infrastructures is not ensured. In the existing infrastructures of Lithuanian studies scientific research and heritage, the accumulated digital and digitized content has a great social and cultural significance, but it could be accessed and used much more efficiently upon merging the resources stored in different infrastructures into one single network and upon implementing the strategic management tools in the sphere of digitization of scientific data and creation of research infrastructures.

The article presents the main data on the situation with the digitization of heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data in Lithuania in 2011. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Communication of Vilnius University when implementing the project Development of the National Network of Infrastructure of Lithuanian Studies Scientific Research and Heritage: the Design Phase financed by the Research Council of Lithuania. The digitization of cultural heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data has been going on in Lithuania for already more than 15 years. During that time, near 100 different information infrastructures have been developed. Most of scientific data are digitized by the Institute of the Lithuanian Language, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, Vilnius University, Vytautas Magnus University and Kaunas University of Technology. From the quantitative point of view, the number of IS controlled by a memory institution is less, but this is determined by a higher concentration and level of strategic management in this sector, which is supervised by the Ministry of Culture. The environmental analysis has shown that the strategic priority given to the scientific research of Lithuanian studies, digitization of their scientific data, heritage data and the legal, political, financial, technological, institutional environment in Lithuania are favourable. There is no factor or reason to be singled out for its strongest influence on the development of infrastructures in Lithuania, because their development is determined by the totality of interrelated factors. When assessing systematically, it was established that the creation and development of the network of Lithuanian studies infrastructure would be most greatly influenced by institutional, technological and function distribution factors; legal and administrative factors would influence them less, while the influence of economic and social factors would be the least. An important source of problems in the digitization of heritage and scientific data of Lithuanian studies in Lithuania is the fact that these sciences, scientific institutions and their infrastructures are supervised by the Ministry of Culture and Science, whereas the memory institutions and information infrastructures of the most important sources (heritage) are in the competence of the Ministry of Culture. Therefore, the creation of specialized information systems and databases in research and memory institutions is almost non-coordinated, and the interoperability of created infrastructures is not ensured. In the existing infrastructures of Lithuanian studies scientific research and heritage, the accumulated digital and digitized content has a great social and cultural significance, but it could be accessed and used much more efficiently upon merging the resources stored in different infrastructures into one single network and upon implementing the strategic management tools in the sphere of digitization of scientific data and creation of research infrastructures.

The article presents the main data on the situation with the digitization of heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data in Lithuania in 2011. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Communication of Vilnius University when implementing the project Development of the National Network of Infrastructure of Lithuanian Studies Scientific Research and Heritage: the Design Phase financed by the Research Council of Lithuania. The digitization of cultural heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data has been going on in Lithuania for already more than 15 years. During that time, near 100 different information infrastructures have been developed. Most of scientific data are digitized by the Institute of the Lithuanian Language, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, Vilnius University, Vytautas Magnus University and Kaunas University of Technology. From the quantitative point of view, the number of IS controlled by a memory institution is less, but this is determined by a higher concentration and level of strategic management in this sector, which is supervised by the Ministry of Culture. The environmental analysis has shown that the strategic priority given to the scientific research of Lithuanian studies, digitization of their scientific data, heritage data and the legal, political, financial, technological, institutional environment in Lithuania are favourable. There is no factor or reason to be singled out for its strongest influence on the development of infrastructures in Lithuania, because their development is determined by the totality of interrelated factors. When assessing systematically, it was established that the creation and development of the network of Lithuanian studies infrastructure would be most greatly influenced by institutional, technological and function distribution factors; legal and administrative factors would influence them less, while the influence of economic and social factors would be the least. An important source of problems in the digitization of heritage and scientific data of Lithuanian studies in Lithuania is the fact that these sciences, scientific institutions and their infrastructures are supervised by the Ministry of Culture and Science, whereas the memory institutions and information infrastructures of the most important sources (heritage) are in the competence of the Ministry of Culture. Therefore, the creation of specialized information systems and databases in research and memory institutions is almost non-coordinated, and the interoperability of created infrastructures is not ensured. In the existing infrastructures of Lithuanian studies scientific research and heritage, the accumulated digital and digitized content has a great social and cultural significance, but it could be accessed and used much more efficiently upon merging the resources stored in different infrastructures into one single network and upon implementing the strategic management tools in the sphere of digitization of scientific data and creation of research infrastructures.

The article presents the main data on the situation with the digitization of heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data in Lithuania in 2011. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Communication of Vilnius University when implementing the project Development of the National Network of Infrastructure of Lithuanian Studies Scientific Research and Heritage: the Design Phase financed by the Research Council of Lithuania. The digitization of cultural heritage and Lithuanian studies scientific data has been going on in Lithuania for already more than 15 years. During that time, near 100 different information infrastructures have been developed. Most of scientific data are digitized by the Institute of the Lithuanian Language, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, Vilnius University, Vytautas Magnus University and Kaunas University of Technology. From the quantitative point of view, the number of IS controlled by a memory institution is less, but this is determined by a higher concentration and level of strategic management in this sector, which is supervised by the Ministry of Culture. The environmental analysis has shown that the strategic priority given to the scientific research of Lithuanian studies, digitization of their scientific data, heritage data and the legal, political, financial, technological, institutional environment in Lithuania are favourable. There is no factor or reason to be singled out for its strongest influence on the development of infrastructures in Lithuania, because their development is determined by the totality of interrelated factors. When assessing systematically, it was established that the creation and development of the network of Lithuanian studies infrastructure would be most greatly influenced by institutional, technological and function distribution factors; legal and administrative factors would influence them less, while the influence of economic and social factors would be the least. An important source of problems in the digitization of heritage and scientific data of Lithuanian studies in Lithuania is the fact that these sciences, scientific institutions and their infrastructures are supervised by the Ministry of Culture and Science, whereas the memory institutions and information infrastructures of the most important sources (heritage) are in the competence of the Ministry of Culture. Therefore, the creation of specialized information systems and databases in research and memory institutions is almost non-coordinated, and the interoperability of created infrastructures is not ensured. In the existing infrastructures of Lithuanian studies scientific research and heritage, the accumulated digital and digitized content has a great social and cultural significance, but it could be accessed and used much more efficiently upon merging the resources stored in different infrastructures into one single network and upon implementing the strategic management tools in the sphere of digitization of scientific data and creation of research infrastructures.

by Cheung Hiu Wan. ; Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1999. ; Includes bibliographical references (leaves [135-140]). ; Abstracts in English and Chinese. ; Acknowledgement ; Abstract ; List of figures ; Chapter Chapter 1. --- Introduction ; Chapter 1.1 --- Scope of Study --- p.1 ; Chapter 1.2 --- Literature Review --- p.3 ; Chapter 1.3 --- Methodology --- p.13 ; Chapter 1.4 --- Structure of the Thesis --- p.17 ; Chapter Chapter 2. --- Historical Development of Comics in China ; Chapter 2.1 --- Comics History before1949 --- p.24 ; Chapter 2 . 2 --- Comics under the Reign of Chinese Communist Party --- p.29 ; Chapter 2.3 --- Beijing Cartoon after the Open Door Policy --- p.31 ; Chapter 2.4 --- Concluding Remarks --- p.39 ; Chapter Chapter 3 . --- Interaction with the Leaders of Beijing Publishing House ; Chapter 3.1 --- Leaders´ةExpectation for Beijing Cartoon --- p.41 ; Chapter 3.2 --- The Discrepancy between the Senior and Junior Editors --- p.51 ; Chapter 3.3 --- Editors' Comments on Interaction with the Leaders of the Beijing Publishing House --- p.54 ; Chapter Chapter 4. --- Interaction with the Senior Artists ; Chapter 4.1 --- Cartoon Art Festival98 --- p.57 ; Chapter 4.2 --- The Invasion of Japanese Comics --- p.59 ; Chapter 4.3 --- The Essence of Comics with Chinese Features --- p.63 ; Chapter 4.4 --- The Expected Role of the Chinese Government --- p.67 ; Chapter 4.5 --- The Editors´ة Comments on Cartoon Art Festival98 --- p.68 ; Chapter 4 . --- 6 Concluding Remarks --- p.70 ; Chapter Chapter 5. --- Interaction with the Junior Artists ; Chapter 5.1 --- Social Status of the Junior Artists --- p.12 ; Chapter 5.2 --- Cooperation with Beijing Cartoon --- p.11 ; Chapter 5.3 --- Why do they Join the Comics Business --- p.79 ; Chapter 5.4 --- Agreement and Terms of Payment --- p.87 ; Chapter 5.5 --- Summer Camping: Market Mechanism and Autonomy in Artists' Creation --- p.88 ; Chapter 5.6 --- The Editors' Expectation on the Roles of The Artists --- p.96 ; Chapter 5.7 --- Artists' Comments on the ...

The article deals with the analysis of the theoretical approaches, that articulate the changes of the sense and the means of communicative actions in the society of the market economy. Communicative actions are regarded first of all from the perspective of the cultural industries concept, that was developed by Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Regarded by them as a mean of manipulation, it is later on questioned by Jürgen Habermas, who sees communicative action as a possibility of democratic developement. Lev Manovich follows the discussion and introduces new concepts of communicative actions, related to the developement of distance control, interaction and databases. As well as the representatives of the Frankfurt School, he also admits that new communication tools serve as manipulative means for the market, but he notices that at the same time these means can also be influenced and organized by an independent user. Nicolas Garnham, John Hartley and other representatives of British cultural studies school admit that the developement of social networks and at the same time of the creative industries lead to a new relationship between the market and the consumer. This new relationship is analyzed in the governmental documents of the EU and particular governmental institutions that support the creation of the creative economy market. Theoretical and governmental discourses join together while promoting the idea of communication, understanding and interaction between the consumers and the citizens of the world.

The article deals with the analysis of the theoretical approaches, that articulate the changes of the sense and the means of communicative actions in the society of the market economy. Communicative actions are regarded first of all from the perspective of the cultural industries concept, that was developed by Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Regarded by them as a mean of manipulation, it is later on questioned by Jürgen Habermas, who sees communicative action as a possibility of democratic developement. Lev Manovich follows the discussion and introduces new concepts of communicative actions, related to the developement of distance control, interaction and databases. As well as the representatives of the Frankfurt School, he also admits that new communication tools serve as manipulative means for the market, but he notices that at the same time these means can also be influenced and organized by an independent user. Nicolas Garnham, John Hartley and other representatives of British cultural studies school admit that the developement of social networks and at the same time of the creative industries lead to a new relationship between the market and the consumer. This new relationship is analyzed in the governmental documents of the EU and particular governmental institutions that support the creation of the creative economy market. Theoretical and governmental discourses join together while promoting the idea of communication, understanding and interaction between the consumers and the citizens of the world.

The article deals with the analysis of the theoretical approaches, that articulate the changes of the sense and the means of communicative actions in the society of the market economy. Communicative actions are regarded first of all from the perspective of the cultural industries concept, that was developed by Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Regarded by them as a mean of manipulation, it is later on questioned by Jürgen Habermas, who sees communicative action as a possibility of democratic developement. Lev Manovich follows the discussion and introduces new concepts of communicative actions, related to the developement of distance control, interaction and databases. As well as the representatives of the Frankfurt School, he also admits that new communication tools serve as manipulative means for the market, but he notices that at the same time these means can also be influenced and organized by an independent user. Nicolas Garnham, John Hartley and other representatives of British cultural studies school admit that the developement of social networks and at the same time of the creative industries lead to a new relationship between the market and the consumer. This new relationship is analyzed in the governmental documents of the EU and particular governmental institutions that support the creation of the creative economy market. Theoretical and governmental discourses join together while promoting the idea of communication, understanding and interaction between the consumers and the citizens of the world.