Kultura: Culture : international journal for cultural researches
ISSN: 1857-7725
1993 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
ISSN: 1857-7725
ISSN: 1606-951X
In: Studies in Islamic history 3
ISSN: 1736-6070
In: Sociologičeskie issledovanija: Socis ; ežemesjačnyj naučnyj i obščestvenno-političeskij žurnal = Sociological studies, Heft 9, S. 49-52
A survey conducted by "Centre for Socio-economic and Humanities Research" at the Kama Polytechnic Institute in the city of Naberezhnye Chelny in October 1999 represents a specific material for the analysis of age differences in the political culture within a particular area - a major industrial city of the Republic of Tatarstan.
In: Modern Research of Social Problems, Heft 1
The article is devoted to the review and analysis of different approaches to the
concept of ecological culture in the socio-philosophical knowledge, philosophical
reflection of ecological culture as value relations between man and nature.
The article discusses the role of culture in the formation of both political and general cultural ideology, based on an evaluative attitude to the elements of social organization, which, in its turn, is based on the right/wrong dichotomy. The author's position as a supporter of classical liberalism is substantiated.The author considers the role of a person's social environment in the formation of their evaluative views within the concept of the four circles of such an environment, affecting the individual and constituting their social environment and social space. He shows the role in the formation of a cultural and political ideology of a person that is played by their level of professional qualifications, their social competitiveness, manifested in their self-confidence or dominant paternalism. The role of low-skilled workers in the history of Russia is considered; the Soviet regime is interpreted as a dictatorship of low-skilled specialists over highly skilled ones. All this forms a certain ideology of both. Liberalism and conservatism are explored as ideological preferences of highly skilled and low-skilled specialists.Cultural artifacts are interpreted through the lens of liberalism and conservatism. A different attitude towards historical progress and the cultural forms of its manifestation underlies these ideological differences. ; В статье анализируется роль культуры в формировании как политической, так и общекультурной идеологии, основанной на оценочном отношении к элементам общественного устроения, базирующемся на дихотомии правильное/неправильное. Обосновывается авторская позиция как сторонника классического либерализма.Рассматривается роль социального окружения человека в формировании его оценочных взглядов в рамках концепции четырех кругов такого окружения, влияющих на индивида и составляющих его социальную среду и социальное пространство. Показано, какую роль в сложении культурной и политической идеологии человека играет уровень его профессиональной квалификации, его социальная конкурентоспособность, проявляющаяся в его уверенности в себе или доминирующем патернализме. Рассматривается роль низкоквалифицированных работников в истории России; при этом советская власть трактуется как диктатура низкоквалифицированных специалистов над высококвалифицированными. Все это формирует определенную идеологию тех и других. Исследуется либерализм и консерватизм как идеологические предпочтения высококвалифицированных и низкоквалифицированных специалистов.Культурные артефакты интерпретируются с позиций либерализма и консерватизма. В основании этих идеологических различий лежит разное отношение к историческому прогрессу и культурным формам его проявления.
BASE
In: Die Welt der Slaven
In: Sammelbände Bd. 41
To understand the depth of transformations in all spheres of society generated by
migration, new terminology is needed. The notion of "postmigrant societies" implies that the
distinction between local and migrant population loses its relevance in certain social spheres.
According to the familiar epistemological framework, societies are presented as consisting of
"local population" on the one hand, and "migrant population" on the other. This understanding,
however, is becoming obsolete. First, it does not reflect the fact that the phenomenon of spatial
mobility is embedded in the social structure. A significant part of the so-called local population
is itself included in migration processes. People who are considered to be part of the
"autochthonous population" are in fact migrants themselves due to different circumstances
(contract work, long-term stay in another country due to studies, involvement in joint business
projects, participation in international scientific teams, availability of real estate abroad, etc.). At
the same time, those people who are regarded as "migrants" by common sense can be well
integrated into the social institutions of their new homeland. Second, the traditional
epistemological framework does not reflect contemporary demographic trends. It is unable to
capture two points: (a) population rotation within the framework of circular/pendulum migration;
(b) qualitative change in the urban population of industrialized countries.