Data sharing or algorithm sharing?
In: NET Institute Working Paper No. 23-08
208257 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NET Institute Working Paper No. 23-08
SSRN
In: Online Information Review, Band 38, Heft 6, S. 709-722
Purpose - Data sharing is key for replication and re-use in empirical research. Scientific journals can play a central role by establishing data policies and providing technologies. This paper analyzes the factors which influence data sharing by investigating journal data policies and the behavior of authors in sociology. Design/methodology/approach - The websites of 140 sociology journals were consulted to check their data policy. The results are compared with similar studies from political science and economics. A broad selection of articles published in five selected journals over a period of two years are examined to determine whether authors really cite and share their data and the factors which are related to this. Findings - Although only a few sociology journals have explicit data policies, most journals make reference to a common policy supplied by their association of publishers. Among the journals selected, relatively few articles provide data citations and even fewer make data available - this is true both for journals with and without data policy. But authors writing for journals with higher impact factors and with data policies are more likely to cite data and to make it really accessible. Originality/value - No study of journal data policies has been undertaken to date for the domain of sociology. A comparison of authors' behaviors regarding data availability, data citation, and data accessibility for journals with or without a data policy provides useful information about the factors which improve data sharing.
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 3-28
ISSN: 1552-8251
This study draws on interviews with forty-nine members of a biomedical research community in the UK that is involved in negotiating data sharing and access. During an interview, an interviewee used the words "ethical moment" to describe a confrontation between collaborators in relation to data sharing. In this article, I use this as a lens for thinking about relations between "the conceptual and the empirical" in a way that allows both analyst and actor to challenge the status quo and consider other ethical possibilities. Drawing on actor network theory (ANT), I approach "the empirical" using the concepts of controversy and ontological uncertainty as methodological tools to tackle the problem of ethics. I suggest that these concepts also provide a bridge for understanding the ontological structure of the virtual and the actual, as described in Deleuze's Difference and Repetition. While other science and technology studies scholars have sought to draw on Deleuze, this article addresses the integration of ethics and empirical research. It arises as a critical reaction to existing treatments of this problem as found in empirical ethics, especially in the sociology of bioethics, and indirectly in ANT texts.
SSRN
In: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE ; an international journal, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 215-216
ISSN: 1556-2654
In: Children & young people now, Band 2014, Heft 9, S. 33-33
ISSN: 2515-7582
In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization: the international journal of public health = Bulletin de l'Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, Band 88, Heft 6, S. 468-468
ISSN: 1564-0604
In: Sarfaraz, M., Hall, D., and Rotman, R. (2022). Data Sharing in Transboundary Water Management. Frontiers in Water, 4:982605. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2022.982605/full.
SSRN
In: ESADE Business School Research Paper No. 273 (2019)
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher's point of view. We show that this process can be divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients . Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that research data cannot be regarded a knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivize data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE ; an international journal, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 317-323
ISSN: 1556-2654
This issue of the Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics highlights the ethical issues that arise when researchers conducting projects in low- and middle-income countries seek to share the data they produce. Although sharing data is considered a best practice, the barriers to doing so are considerable and there is a need for guidance and examples. To that end, the authors of this article reviewed the articles in this special issue to identify challenges common to the five countries and to offer some practical advice to assist researchers in navigating this "uncharted territory," as some termed it. Concerns around informed consent, data management, data dissemination, and validation of research contributions were cited frequently as particularly challenging areas, so the authors focused on these four topics with the goal of providing specific resources to consult as well as examples of successful projects attempting to solve many of the problems raised.
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 13, Heft 1-2, S. 45-52
ISSN: 1552-8251
In: GESIS-Technical Reports, Band 2014/03