Decision-Making in International Organizations: Actors, Preferences, and Institutions
In: Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Atlanta, March 16-19 2016.
1611341 results
Sort by:
In: Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Atlanta, March 16-19 2016.
SSRN
Working paper
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Volume 3, Issue 3, p. 269-276
ISSN: 1460-373X
In science policy the decision-making process is very complex. Transfers of skills and techniques influence political decisions. Transfers are at one and the same time political ends and objects of policy. There are many ways to achieve a transfer and they go far beyond the traditional approach of transmission from rich countries to poor countries. Transnational Units (UTN) store skills and techniques and redistribute them according to their interests and a "center-periphery" process. They control the transfer agreements and their applications. The OECD has modeled nine different forms of transfer. The result shows the complexity of the political decision-making process that involves flows, fluctuations of decision, and timely decisions.
Decision-making about infrastructure is very complex. Decisions to develop the Rotterdam harbour are being taken in a network of local, regional and national actors and influenced by international actors (firms, NGO's etc.) both public and private. This decision-making process shows a lot of uncertainty and complexity and the outcomes are of great importance for the development of the harbour. Network theory has been widely used to indicate, explain and manage uncertainty in decision-making processes. The theory is well equipped for empirical research and has shown many applicable results. The attention for influences from outside the network to decision-making inside the network is however still poorly developed. In the case of decision-making with a strong international component this is a handicap. In this paper the relation between influences from outside and decision-making inside networks is studied both theoretically and empirically. A distinction is made between locally bound and non-locally bound networks to theorise the complex decision-making process. The well-known scientific concept of space of flows versus space of places from Manuel Castells is used as an inspiration to describe the relation between the locally and non-locally bounded networks of decision making. The locally bounded network is formed by the formal decision making process between the governmental and non-governmental organisations in countries, regions and municipalities. The non-locally bounded networks exist of organizations that are footloose and act globally mainly according to economic principals. The concept of inclusion is used to analyse the various actors in the decision-making process. The paper starts with the description of the external influences in port areas in general. The balance between the influence of local and non-local bounded networks depends on the multiple-inclusion of the different actors in the decision-making process in both networks. In areas in which many actors are included in the place-bounded networks, the external influences can be expected to be marginal. The port area of Rotterdam is a node in international networks and so the hypothesis can be set that in the Rotterdam port area the influence of actors mainly included in non-place bounded networks is significant in decision making networks. To explore this assumption various networks, which are relevant for decision-making about spatial issues in the Rotterdam port are identified and the differences in inclusion of the relevant actors is analysed. By means of the analysis of perceptions of the various actors (locally bound or non-locally bound) and their strategic choices and decisions we show that notions on international port development are being interpreted and transformed quite differently by the various actors. This first part of analysis highlights the possible gap between the awareness of the various actors of the non-locally bounded networks and their translation into their strategies in local bounded networks. We also trace difference of perceptions and strategies between actors who solely operate in locally bound networks and actors who are both included in locally and non-locally bound networks (like shipping firms etc). This second part of analysis indicates if there are differences in what the actors use as input for their respective positions in the decision-making networks. The paper shows that the influence of external developments in non-locally bound networks manifests itself in locally bound networks but is transformed and interpreted in many ways by the different actors. The paper ends with some conclusions about decision-making on large ports and the possibilities to influence this complex decision-making process that takes place in locally bound and non-locally bounded networks at the same time.
BASE
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Volume 3, Issue 3, p. 269-276
ISSN: 0192-5121
World Affairs Online
In: Land ; Volume 8 ; Issue 2
Humanitarian and development organizations working in conflict-affected settings have a particular responsibility to do no harm and contribute to the wellbeing of the population without bias. The highly complex, politicized realities of work in conflict- and post-conflict settings often require quick, pragmatic and results-oriented decisions, the foundations of which remain frequently implicit. Such decisions might follow an intrinsic logic or situational pragmatism rather than intensive deliberation. This paper reflects on the realities of working on land governance in post-conflict settings shaped by migration, ethnic division, power struggles and limited statehood. Using case examples from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Burundi, this paper reflects on the drivers of decisions around land governance in such contexts in a structured, theoretically informed way. Drawing on the author&rsquo ; s own experience with supporting land rights work and utilizing Giddens&rsquo ; concept of the Duality of Structure, this article provides an analysis of actors and structures that sheds light on the factors that affect the decision-making of practitioners relating to land rights in post-conflict areas of limited statehood.
BASE
In: American political science review, Volume 95, Issue 2, p. 361-378
ISSN: 0003-0554
To what extent does the separation of powers affect congressional roll call voting behavior? To answer this question, I offer a strategic model of congressional decision making that asserts members of Congress pursue public policy goals when casting roll call votes. From the equilibrium predictions of a formal model, I generate testable hypotheses by computing the expected net amount of sophisticated (nonsincere) congressional behavior given changes in decision context. I test the predications of the theoretical model with data from all civil rights roll call votes from the 83d to the 102d Congress. The results demonstrate that both the other legislative chamber & the Supreme Court profoundly constrain House members & senators when casting roll call votes. This is strong evidence of the importance of policy outcomes to members of Congress when voting on the floor. 2 Tables, 7 Figures, 1 Appendix, 49 References. Adapted from the source document.
Experts are increasingly relied on in decision-making processes at international and European levels. Their involvement in those processes, however, is contested. This timely book on the role of 'experts' provides a broad-gauged analysis of the issues raised by their involvement in decision-making processes. The chapters explore three main recurring themes: the rationales for involving experts and ensuing legitimacy problems; the individual and collective dimensions of expert involvement in decision making; and experts and politics and the politics of expertise. With contributions from leading scholars and practitioners, they theorize the experts' involvement in general and address their role in the policy areas of environment, trade, human rights, migration, financial regulation, and agencification in the European Union
SSRN
"Analyses of the significance of knowledge in present day society, also referred to as knowledge society, fuelled our curiosity about the role that experts play in international and European decision-making processes. This interest prompted us to ask the question reflected in the title of this book: are experts in these decision-making processes advisors, decisio"--
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Volume 95, Issue 2, p. 361-378
ISSN: 1537-5943
To what extent does the separation of powers affect congressional roll call voting behavior? To answer this question, I offer a strategic model of congressional decision making that asserts members of Congress pursue public policy goals when casting roll call votes. From the equilibrium predictions of a formal model, I generate testable hypotheses by computing the expected net amount of sophisticated (nonsincere) congressional behavior given changes in decision context. I test the predictions of the theoretical model with data from all civil rights roll call votes from the 83d to the 102d Congress. The results demonstrate that both the other legislative chamber and the Supreme Court profoundly constrain House members and senators when casting roll call votes. This is strong evidence of the importance of policy outcomes to members of Congress when voting on the floor.
Abstract Background Healthcare costs in most developed countries are not clearly linked to better patient and public health outcomes, but are rather associated with service delivery orientation. In the U.S. this has resulted in large variation in healthcare availability and use, increased cost, reduced employer participation in health insurance programs, and reduced overall population health outcomes. Recent U.S. healthcare reform legislation addresses only some of these issues. Other countries face similar healthcare issues. Discussion A major goal of healthcare is to enhance patient health outcomes. This objective is not realized in many countries because incentives and structures are currently not aligned for maximizing population health. The misalignment occurs because of the competing interests between "actors" in healthcare. In a simplified model these are individuals motivated to enhance their own health; enterprises (including a mix of nonprofit, for profit and government providers, payers, and suppliers, etc.) motivated by profit, political, organizational and other forces; and government which often acts in the conflicting roles of a healthcare payer and provider in addition to its role as the representative and protector of the people. An imbalance exists between the actors, due to the resources and information control of the enterprise and government actors relative to the individual and the public. Failure to use effective preventive interventions is perhaps the best example of the misalignment of incentives. We consider the current Pareto efficient balance between the actors in relation to the Pareto frontier, and show that a significant change in the healthcare market requires major changes in the utilities of the enterprise and government actors. Summary A variety of actions are necessary for maximizing population health within the constraints of available resources and the current balance between the actors. These actions include improved transparency of all aspects of medical decision making, greater involvement of patients in shared medical decision making, greater oversight of guideline development and coverage decisions, limitations on direct to consumer advertising, and the need for an enhanced role of the government as the public advocate.
BASE
In: Politics: Australasian Political Studies Association journal, Volume 14, Issue 2, p. 183-197
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Volume 32, Issue 1, p. 159-176
ISSN: 1468-0491
Decentralized decision making has created restructuring from larger to smaller administrative units, but in many places, strays little from existing arrangements. Moves toward decentralization from central government to city‐regions, and in some areas, below city‐region scale to neighborhoods, reflect a mandate for reform. What is the nature and extent of desired reforms? Using an institutionalist lens, homogeneity and heterogeneity in local narratives about possible future reform can be surfaced. This article emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of local actors' narratives in shaping decentralized institutions. This article uses the findings from a Q‐methodology study to identify and interrogate distinctive local viewpoints on attempts to decentralize decision making in England. In a systematic empirical analysis, local actors' narratives were largely in favor of relatively minor modifications to the status quo. The findings question a conflation of decentralization with participation in decision making.
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Volume 6, Issue 3, p. 236-243
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
A study to analyze the emotional factors, esp hostility (H), affecting internat'l decision-making. 2 historical decisions, occurring in the 6-week period prior to WWI, were selected: the Austrian ultimatum to Serbia, & the Russian decision to mobilize the entire Russian armed forces. Concern was focused on 3 aspects of H: (1) behavioral effects of feelings of persecution; (2) effects of perceiving H in the environment, regardless of who was seen as the object; (3) effects of being hostile. 6 hyp's were formulated: the more the leader sees himself as the object of H, (A) the more often he will make hostile statements, (B) the more states he sees as hostile toward himself, (C) the more hostile states he sees, (D) the less often he will make statements of goals or policy, (E) the more H the leader perceives in the environment, the fewer policy statements he will make, & (F) the more hostile statements the leader makes, the more H he will perceive in his environment. In analyzing the 2 historical decisions chosen, it was discovered that (a) perceiving itself as the object of H does not necessarily affect a state's behavior in these 2 ways: it does not necessarily make a state more or less hostile nor influence it to issue more or less policy statements; (b) a feeling of persecution is related to a state's perception of many hostile states in the environment, & to its perception that many diff states are hostile to itself; (c) perception of H does not affect the stating of policy; & (d) a state which is behaving in a hostile manner tends to see other states as hostile. D. Coonerman.
In: American political science review, Volume 95, Issue 2, p. 361-378
ISSN: 0003-0554