Deliberative Democracy in the Trenches
In: Daedalus, Symposium on Deliberative Democracy, Forthcoming
832 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Daedalus, Symposium on Deliberative Democracy, Forthcoming
SSRN
This paper traces the evolution of deliberative institutions in India to understand the role of deliberation in democratic life, as well as the ways in which deliberative bodies influence, and are influenced by, entrenched social inequality. The paper first unpacks the historical roots of Indian deliberation in the pre-colonial and colonial periods, emphasizing the ways in which religious traditions fostered a culture of debate and dialogue. The paper then explores the interplay between Western liberal philosophers, most notably Henry Maine, and Indian political thinkers, including Gandhi and Ambedkar, on participatory democracy in India. The discussion then highlights the continued dialogue between Indian and Western ideas in the push for greater participatory development. Finally, the paper probes the current incarnation of state-sponsored deliberation in India -- namely, village assemblies known as gram sabhas under the constitutionally mandated system of Indian village democracy or Panchayati Raj -- and reviews the growing empirical scholarship about these village assemblies.
BASE
In: The library of contemporary essays in governance and political theory
The epistemic dimension of democratic authority? / David Estlund -- What deliberative democracy means / Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson -- Political communication in media society : does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension / Jurgen Habermas -- Deliberative democracy and the case for depoliticising government / Philip Pettit -- Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy / John S. Dryzek -- Making deliberative democracy practical : public consultation and dispute resolution / James S. Fishkin -- Deliberative impacts : the macro-political uptake of mini-publics / Robert E. Goodin and John S. Dryzek -- Reviving randomness for political rationality : elements of a theory of aleatory democracy / Hubertus Buchstein -- Models of democratic deliberation / Noelle McAfee -- Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism / Chantal Mouffe -- New mediation and direct representation : reconceptualizing representation in the digital age / Stephen Coleman -- The Internet, deliberative democracy, and power : radicalizing the public sphere / Lincoln Dahlberg -- Global democracy / Joshua Cohen and Charles F. Sabel -- Governance-driven democratization / Mark E. Warren -- Varieties of participation in complex governance / Archon Fung -- Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment : the cultural politics of discursive space / Frank Fischer
From small-scale experiments, deliberative mini-publics have recently taken a constitutional turn in Europe. Iceland and Ireland have turned to deliberative democracy to reform their constitutions. Estonia, Luxembourg and Romania have also experienced constitutional process in a deliberative mode. In Belgium the G1000, a citizen-led initiative of deliberative democracy, has fostered a wider societal debate about the role and place of citizens in the country's democracy. At the same time, European institutions have introduced different forms of deliberative democracy as a way to connect citizens back in. These empirical cases are emblematic of a possibly constitutional turn in deliberative democracy in Europe. The purpose of this book is to critically assess these developments, bringing together academics involved in the designing of these new forms of constitutional deliberative democracy with the theorists who propagated the ideas and evaluated democratic standards.
BASE
In: Critical review: a journal of politics and society, Band 28, Heft 3-4, S. 494-516
ISSN: 1933-8007
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 28, Heft 3-4, S. 494-516
ISSN: 0891-3811
In: Excerpt from Separation of Powers and Deliberative Democracy, in Ron Levy, Hoi Kong, Graeme Orr and Jeff King (eds.) "The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism" (Cambridge University Press, 2018) at pages 113-124
SSRN
In: ECPR - studies in European political science
This response to Samuelsson's typology for assessing deliberative democracy in classroom discussions views his analysis through an equity lens. It offers Young's model of communicative democracy as a resource and argues that incorporating that model's emphasis on greeting, rhetoric, and storytelling into the typology can help to promote more equitable deliberative communication in the classroom. It offers specific tools, based on the author's development of deliberative pedagogy in a biology classroom, that teachers can use across disciplines and educational settings to help promote more equitable deliberative communication in classroom discussions.
BASE
In: A GlassHouse book
Deliberation in a juridifying world -- Deliberative democracy and elections -- Deliberative democracy and the law of politics -- Liberty v deliberation (the accommodation problem) -- Equality v deliberation (the equality problem) -- Integrity v diliberation (the partisanship and coercion problems) -- Deliberative democracy as an holistic value
In: Applied legal philosophy
Is the ideal of a deliberative democracy coherent? / Cristina Lafont -- The epistemic conception of deliberative democracy defended : reasons, rightness and equal political autonomy / Jose Luis Marti -- The value added by theories of deliberative democracy : where (not) to look / Andreas Follesdal -- Democracy and the real speech situation / David Estlund -- Depoliticizing democracy / Philip Pettit -- Conflict and self-interest in deliberation / Jane Mansbridge -- Framing public deliberation and democratic legitimacy in the European Union / Deirdre Curtin -- The people in deliberative democracy / Francis Cheneval -- Deliberative demoi-cracy in the European Union : towards the deterritorialization of democracy / Samantha Besson -- Institutional reform and democratic legitimacy : deliberative democracy and transnational constitutionalism / James Bohman -- Should deliberative democrats defend the judicial enforcement of social rights? / Roberto Gargarella.
The globalization process is not reducible to its international dimension, i.e., to international, or even, to transnational relationships. In many states, it also consists of domestic phenomena, such as an increasing cultural pluralism, that does not result solely from a domestic and gradual evolution, but, to a significant extent, either from migrations or from radical changes of mind made possible by cultural globalization. This kind of cultural pluralism is what one can call multiculturalism, in the descriptive sense of the characteristics of a multicultural society (as distinguished from the normative meaning, i.e., from the policies that aim at either maintaining or promoting multiculturalism in the descriptive meaning). This paper aims to discuss the articulation between deliberative democracy and cultural pluralism.
BASE
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 198-220
ISSN: 1471-6437
Abstract:This essay defends deliberative democracy by reviving a largely forgotten idea of corruption, which I call "cognitive corruption"—the distortion of judgment. I analyze different versions of this idea in the work of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Bentham, and Mill. Historical analysis also helps me rethink orthodox notions of corruption in two ways: I define corruption in terms of public duty rather than public office, and I argue that corruption can be both by and for political parties. In deliberative democracy, citizens can take off their party hats and may be more influenced by the force of the better argument than in party democracy.
In: International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, September 2018
SSRN
In: International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, Volume 3; Issue 5; September 2018; Page No. 45-53
SSRN