Dialogue of Judges – Verbindungsrichter und internationale Richternetzwerke Ein innovatives Instrumentarium in grenzüberschreitenden Familiensachen
In: JuristenZeitung, Band 72, Heft 7, S. 332
59919 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: JuristenZeitung, Band 72, Heft 7, S. 332
In: 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1889, 2012
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: SHAPING RULE OF LAW THROUGH DIALOGUE - INTERNATIONAL AND SUPRANATIONAL EXPERIENCES, F. Fontanelli, G. Martinico, P. Carrozza, eds., pp. 345-373, Europa Law Publishing, 2010
SSRN
In: Chinese and comparative law series volume 9
Courts and judicial reforms / Ragna Aarli and Anne Sanders -- China / Ragna Aarli -- Germany / Reinhard Gaier and Anne Sanders -- Slovenia / Nina Betetto -- England and Wales / Right Hon Sir Richard Aikens -- Norway / Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen and Ragna Aarli -- Comparative reflections the role of the judge in the melting pot / Ragna Aarli -- Litigation explosion and reactions from courts in China / Weidong Chen -- A study of the tripartite powers in reforms to the judicial power operation system in China / Lei Du -- The love triangle? The German federal constitutional court and its two European neighbours / Vanessa Hellmann -- Judicial case management and loyal cooperation towards harmonized European rules of civil procedure / Remco van Rhee -- Court management for sustainable judiciary : the case of Switzerland / Andreas Lienhard -- Conclusions and outlook / Ragna Aarli Anne.
The difficulties to establish a dialogue between judges are well illustrated by french administrative judge's attitude with respect to the Court of Justice of European Union and regarding the preliminary ruling proceedings. Indeed, french administrative judges have clearly considered that they could assert their autonomy through the use of the acte clair doctrine and the rule of precedent (stare decisis) to prevent the preleminary ruling. The excessive use of both procedural approaches has been the source of numerous problems, notably for the authority and effects of preliminary ruling decisions. For its part, the Court also took positions either radically opposite to that of the national judges, or that at least were not in favour of a putative dialogue. Indeed, the Court has clearly wished to assert its authority over the national judges by an extensive use of the competences European Treaties awarded to it. This context has fortunately started to resolve itself through a reciprocal acceptance of competences and prerogatives by the concerned authorities in the dialogue. This emerging dialogue must be reinforced and promoted via routine exchanges and novel techniques. Both jurisdictions will have to steer in harmony in this direction of the european legal pluralism. ; L'attitude du juge administratif français face à la Cour de justice et au regard des obligations imposées par la procédure préjudicielle est particulièrement démonstrative des difficultés de mise en place d'un dialogue des juges, bien que le mécanisme préjudiciel soit considéré comme le canal privilégié de celui-ci et comme son pendant juridique. Le juge administratif a cru pouvoir affirmer son indépendance et son autonomie en usant de la théorie de l'acte clair et de la règle du précédent. Les abus commis dans l'utilisation de ces moyens procéduraux, occultant le renvoi préjudiciel, ont posé des difficultés et il en fut de même pour l'autorité et les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. De son côté la Cour a aussi exprimé des volontés contraires ou ...
BASE
The difficulties to establish a dialogue between judges are well illustrated by french administrative judge's attitude with respect to the Court of Justice of European Union and regarding the preliminary ruling proceedings. Indeed, french administrative judges have clearly considered that they could assert their autonomy through the use of the acte clair doctrine and the rule of precedent (stare decisis) to prevent the preleminary ruling. The excessive use of both procedural approaches has been the source of numerous problems, notably for the authority and effects of preliminary ruling decisions. For its part, the Court also took positions either radically opposite to that of the national judges, or that at least were not in favour of a putative dialogue. Indeed, the Court has clearly wished to assert its authority over the national judges by an extensive use of the competences European Treaties awarded to it. This context has fortunately started to resolve itself through a reciprocal acceptance of competences and prerogatives by the concerned authorities in the dialogue. This emerging dialogue must be reinforced and promoted via routine exchanges and novel techniques. Both jurisdictions will have to steer in harmony in this direction of the european legal pluralism. ; L'attitude du juge administratif français face à la Cour de justice et au regard des obligations imposées par la procédure préjudicielle est particulièrement démonstrative des difficultés de mise en place d'un dialogue des juges, bien que le mécanisme préjudiciel soit considéré comme le canal privilégié de celui-ci et comme son pendant juridique. Le juge administratif a cru pouvoir affirmer son indépendance et son autonomie en usant de la théorie de l'acte clair et de la règle du précédent. Les abus commis dans l'utilisation de ces moyens procéduraux, occultant le renvoi préjudiciel, ont posé des difficultés et il en fut de même pour l'autorité et les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. De son côté la Cour a aussi exprimé des volontés contraires ou ...
BASE
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 737-750
ISSN: 1468-2478
In: Tulne Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Band 16
SSRN
SWP
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 335-340
ISSN: 1537-5927