Suchergebnisse

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The modern museum field actors – the founders, curators and visitors – their existence environment is influenced by network society and virtuality culture. Digital media expression in the museum is the media interaction, according to which the different concepts of museum 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 were defined in this research. Museality is effective only when all the elements of the museum are adapted to the appropriate cultural level of the museum and communication happens taking into account the interests of partners. Systemic contradictions which became obvious show that the trends of the expression in the digital media in Lithuanian government institutions, museums and society do not always match. The research revealed that during the Soviet times, the museum 0.0 concept was dominant in Lithuanian museums communication strengthened by the control of communist regime and formed by the traditional media expression, and the needs of the industrial society. After the restoration of independence, the application of digital media in Lithuanian museums corresponded to the prolonged expectations peak of Gartner methodology, which has resulted in late massive stage in the application of digital media – the plateau of productivity. The research concerning characteristics of social networking tools in Lithuanian museum websites, visits to them, and in Facebook social media accounts and museums clustering results show that the majority of Lithuanian museums perform the communication in virtual space not according to the to the participatory museum 2.0 concept, which corresponds to the needs of networking society, but according to museum 1.0 concept, which is characteristic to the transition period from an industrial to networking society. The research showed that digital media expression in Lithuania is influenced by historical, legal - political context, technological possibilities and the appropriate application of digital media in Lithuanian museums and society.

The Internet and interactive social media are not only playing an increasingly important role in people's daily life, but are also becoming a widely used channel of political communication which sees a constant growth in the volume of communication content generated by politicians. Due to their features such as easy and free access, social media are available to all politicians, but no studies have so far been done in Lithuania which would analyse the extent to which the participants in the political process use the channels of social media for the purpose of political communication. In this article, the use of social media for political communication purposes is analysed from the perspective of the digital divide. The definition and concept of the digital divide are clearly described in the text. Different categories of the manifestation of this process are identified. Moreover, this article also presents the results of the research of social media as it was used by our country's politicians during the municipal elections campaign in 2011. They reveal different manifestations of the digital divide based on different demographic and social-political characteristics of politicians, such as municipality size, gender, age, education, income, political affiliation and institutional position.

The Internet and interactive social media are not only playing an increasingly important role in people's daily life, but are also becoming a widely used channel of political communication which sees a constant growth in the volume of communication content generated by politicians. Due to their features such as easy and free access, social media are available to all politicians, but no studies have so far been done in Lithuania which would analyse the extent to which the participants in the political process use the channels of social media for the purpose of political communication. In this article, the use of social media for political communication purposes is analysed from the perspective of the digital divide. The definition and concept of the digital divide are clearly described in the text. Different categories of the manifestation of this process are identified. Moreover, this article also presents the results of the research of social media as it was used by our country's politicians during the municipal elections campaign in 2011. They reveal different manifestations of the digital divide based on different demographic and social-political characteristics of politicians, such as municipality size, gender, age, education, income, political affiliation and institutional position.

The Internet and interactive social media are not only playing an increasingly important role in people's daily life, but are also becoming a widely used channel of political communication which sees a constant growth in the volume of communication content generated by politicians. Due to their features such as easy and free access, social media are available to all politicians, but no studies have so far been done in Lithuania which would analyse the extent to which the participants in the political process use the channels of social media for the purpose of political communication. In this article, the use of social media for political communication purposes is analysed from the perspective of the digital divide. The definition and concept of the digital divide are clearly described in the text. Different categories of the manifestation of this process are identified. Moreover, this article also presents the results of the research of social media as it was used by our country's politicians during the municipal elections campaign in 2011. They reveal different manifestations of the digital divide based on different demographic and social-political characteristics of politicians, such as municipality size, gender, age, education, income, political affiliation and institutional position.

The Internet and interactive social media are not only playing an increasingly important role in people's daily life, but are also becoming a widely used channel of political communication which sees a constant growth in the volume of communication content generated by politicians. Due to their features such as easy and free access, social media are available to all politicians, but no studies have so far been done in Lithuania which would analyse the extent to which the participants in the political process use the channels of social media for the purpose of political communication. In this article, the use of social media for political communication purposes is analysed from the perspective of the digital divide. The definition and concept of the digital divide are clearly described in the text. Different categories of the manifestation of this process are identified. Moreover, this article also presents the results of the research of social media as it was used by our country's politicians during the municipal elections campaign in 2011. They reveal different manifestations of the digital divide based on different demographic and social-political characteristics of politicians, such as municipality size, gender, age, education, income, political affiliation and institutional position.

The Internet and interactive social media are not only playing an increasingly important role in people's daily life, but are also becoming a widely used channel of political communication which sees a constant growth in the volume of communication content generated by politicians. Due to their features such as easy and free access, social media are available to all politicians, but no studies have so far been done in Lithuania which would analyse the extent to which the participants in the political process use the channels of social media for the purpose of political communication. In this article, the use of social media for political communication purposes is analysed from the perspective of the digital divide. The definition and concept of the digital divide are clearly described in the text. Different categories of the manifestation of this process are identified. Moreover, this article also presents the results of the research of social media as it was used by our country's politicians during the municipal elections campaign in 2011. They reveal different manifestations of the digital divide based on different demographic and social-political characteristics of politicians, such as municipality size, gender, age, education, income, political affiliation and institutional position.

The intensified selective exposure of political news on social media, personalization of the news receiving process, and emerging new information phenomena, such as filter bubbles and echo chambers, call for a rethink of the role of new digital media in a democratic society. This article analyzes the possible influence of new information phenomena on social media - information wells and filter bubbles - in receiving political news. The mechanisms and conditions of the formation of echo chambers and filter bubbles in social media are discussed in detail, and results of research conducted to date proving these phenomena are briefly presented. The article examines the possibilities of disseminating political news on social media and the restrictions on accessing comprehensive political information due to new information phenomena. The problems of political partisans' perception of the news related to these restrictions, their possible extreme actions, and their influence on democratic processes are discussed.

In this thesis, I analyze the relation between internet media and politics. Historical context of the Internet evolution is used as a means to understand the sources of its influence. The analysis of the outcomes of social movements formation on digital space, the possibilities to expand democracy, attempts of government to control over information flow on the Internet, and its conflict with opposing forces is used for better understanding of politics power over the Internet. Influence of networked society on national internal and external policy, and new forms of politics is also reviewed. The tight bond between internet media and politics is found in research of politics influence on internet and internet impact on politics.