Suchergebnisse

This paper is no longer available at the original handle: http://93.63.166.138:8080/dspace/handle/2012/98 ; As data increases in volume, complexity and value, there is a growing recognition of the need for digital data curation. The demand for data curation is not limited to libraries, archives, museums and other cultural institutions. Government agencies, universities, scientific enterprises, and data-intensive private sector companies increasingly need enhanced capabilities to improve data quality, protect data from various threats, and to exploit data assets to their fullest. Digital curation is both a promising career track for information professionals and a skill needed by everyone who has responsibility for data-intensive work.

Currently, Uruguayans use technological solutions in their everyday lives so much and in such an intensive manner that they have turned Uruguay into the most advanced digital society in the region. Furthermore, Uruguay has received international recognitions for the quality of its digital government, information security, interoperability, citizen service, e-participation, online services, personal data protection, access to public information, and electronic signature solutions. These advances have allowed the country to quickly improve its position at an international level, making a difference due to its innovative approach to Digital Government policies and to digital technologies' applications while keeping the focus on citizens. This article summarizes the journey of Uruguay from the data perspective in order to achieve such success.

This book provides a nuanced exploration of contemporary digital data governance, highlighting the importance of cooperation across sectors and disciplines in order to adapt to a rapidly evolving technological landscape. Most of the theory around global digital data governance remains scattered and focused on specific actors, norms, processes, or disciplinary approaches. This book argues for a polycentric approach, allowing readers to consider the issue across multiple disciplines and scales. Polycentrism, this book argues, provides a set of lenses that tie together the variety of actors, issues, and processes intertwined in digital data governance at subnational, national, regional, and global levels. Firstly, this approach uncovers the complex array of power centers and connections in digital data governance. Secondly, polycentric perspectives bridge disciplinary divides, challenging assumptions and drawing together a growing range of insights about the complexities of digital data governance. Bringing together a wide range of case studies, this book draws out key insights and policy recommendations for how digital data governance occurs and how it might occur differently. Written by an international and interdisciplinary team, this book will be of interest to students and scholars in the field of development studies, political science, international relations, global studies, science and technology studies, sociology, and media and communication studies. The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

Ausgehend von den Begriffen der Verantwortung und der Bildung stellt Christian Swertz am Beginn seines Beitrags die (medienpädagogische) Frage nach dem Eigentum und diskutiert das Verhältnis von Menschenrechten und Arbeitsmarkt. Dabei präsentiert der Artikel unterschiedliche Konzepte wie "Media- and Informationliteracy" (MIL) bzw. "Digitale Kompetenzen" (DigComp bzw. OECD) und konstatiert eine Differenz in der (auch demokratiepolitischen) Legitimation dieser Konzepte. In diesem Zusammenhang geht es auch angesichts von "Data Literacy" um eine verantwortliche Nutzung und Gestaltung von Technik in der Pädagogik, die eine spezifische Mediendidaktik und Medienkompetenzvermittlung nötig werden lassen. Dabei stehen Selbstbildung und Zukunftsoffenheit im Zentrum des medienpädagogischen Interesses, das sich vor allem im Sinne der Allgemeinen Bildung konkretisieren lässt.

Indigenous peoples are addressing the ongoing impacts of settler colonialism through a variety of expressions of community resurgence. Among these initiatives are those leveraging digital technologies. In the emergent network society, digital infrastructures, and information and communication technologies are powerful tools that can support self-government. In this context, we document the development of digital data management in the Mohawk community of Kahnawà:ke. Data is the digital information generated by a community, encompassing areas like research, education, finance, health, membership, housing, lands, and resources. As self-determining political entities, each First Nation determines how this data is interpreted and used, supported by tools like data management platforms and information-sharing protocols. In this article, we show how local practices regarding the collection, use, and sharing of digital data in Kahnawà:ke provides a clear example of Indigenous resurgence.

Indigenous peoples are addressing the ongoing impacts of settler colonialism through a variety of expressions of community resurgence. Among these initiatives are those leveraging digital technologies. In the emergent network society, digital infrastructures, and information and communication technologies are powerful tools that can support self-government. In this context, we document the development of digital data management in the Mohawk community of Kahnawà:ke. Data is the digital information generated by a community, encompassing areas like research, education, finance, health, membership, housing, lands, and resources. As self-determining political entities, each First Nation determines how this data is interpreted and used, supported by tools like data management platforms and information-sharing protocols. In this article, we show how local practices regarding the collection, use, and sharing of digital data in Kahnawà:ke provides a clear example of Indigenous resurgence.

Many actors mobilize the cognitive, legal and technical tool-box of data protection when they discuss and address controversial issues such as digital mass surveillance. Yet, critical approaches to the digital only barely explore the politics of data protection in relation to data-driven governance. Building on governmentality studies and Actor- Network-Theory, this article analyses the potential and limits of using data protection to critique the 'digital age'. Using the conceptual tool of dispositifs, it sketches an analytics of data protection and the emergence of its configuration as 'data protection by design and by default'. This exploration reminds us that governing through data implies, first and foremost, governing digital data.

Many actors mobilize the cognitive, legal and technical tool-box of data protection when they discuss and address controversial issues such as digital mass surveillance. Yet, critical approaches to the digital only barely explore the politics of data protection in relation to data-driven governance. Building on governmentality studies and Actor- Network-Theory, this article analyses the potential and limits of using data protection to critique the 'digital age'. Using the conceptual tool of dispositifs, it sketches an analytics of data protection and the emergence of its configuration as 'data protection by design and by default'. This exploration reminds us that governing through data implies, first and foremost, governing digital data.