Suchergebnisse

تناولت هذه الدراسة موضوعاً في غاية الأهمية يتعلق بإشكاليات تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الإدارية الصادرة ضد الإدارة. وتهدف الدراسة إلى التصدي لظاهرة امتناع الإدارة عن تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الإدارية والحد من حالات حدوثها، في ظل عدم إمكانية القاضي الإداري التدخل في عمل الإدارة. وتقوم مسؤولية الإدارة والموظف المسؤول في حالة الامتناع عن تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الإدارية كذلك وفي حالتي التراخي أو التباطؤ في التنفيذ، فالموظف يمكن تحريك دعوى جنائية ضده بموجب أحكام المادة (182) من قانون العقوبات الأردني، ويمكن إثارة مسؤوليته التأديبية من جهة الإدارة ذاتها وبالنتيجة ممكن أن تعاقبه تأديبياً لإخلاله بواجباته الوظيفية، كما أن الإدارة يمكن إثارة مسؤوليتها عن التأخير في تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الإدارية ورفع دعوى ضدها أمام القضاء الإداري للمطالبة بالتعويض كما أن القضاء الإداري يمكن أن يحكم عليها إضافة للتعويض بإلغاء القرار الإداري السلبي الناتج عن الامتناع. ; Abstract Researcher address in this study was a very important subject related to a problematic implementation of administrative judicial rulings issued against the administration. The study aims to address the phenomenon of the administration's failure to implement judicial rulings and reducing administrative cases occur in administrative judge to intervene in the work administration. The responsibility of the management and the employee that responsible for implementation in case of refusal from implementation of the administrative judicial rulings and in case of inaction or slowdown it is possible to move a criminal claim against him under the provision of article (182) of the Jordan penal code, and its possible to raise his disciplinary responsibility from the department side itself, as result its possible to punish him in disciplinarian way for the breach of his duties. Also it is possible to raise the management responsibility for the delay in the implementation of the administrative judicial rulings and moving claim against them in front of administrative judiciary for asking a compensation also the administrative judiciary can be judged in addition to the compensation by canceling the negative administrative decision that result from the refusal. KEYWORDS:THE NON-EXECUTION OF ADMINISTRATION , NULLITY JUDGMENTS, ADMINISTRATION JUDICIAL RULING.

The Nancy N. Boothe papers, 1980-2009 [bulk 1990-1997], are composed of articles, notes, reports and a wide variety of feminist publications. Much of the material documents the U.N. Fourth World Conference on Women, which Ms. Boothe attended as Executive Director of Atlanta's Feminist Women's Health Center. Artifacts, artwork and textiles relate to the conference and to other women's and health issues. ; Born in Battles Wharf, Alabama (1948), Nancy N. Boothe graduated from the University of South Alabama as a registered nurse (1971). She received a B.S. in nursing from the Medical College of Georgia (1976), and a master's degree in Counseling from Troy State University [Florida Region] (1981). Boothe served in the U.S. Nurse Corps in the U.S. and Korea (1970-1984), and worked as clinical director and consultant at a number of health facilities in Louisiana and Florida. She became Executive Director of the Atlanta Feminist Women's Health Center in 1994. In 1995, she attended the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China, where she taught the workshop, ""GYN Self-Help."" Boothe has served on the boards of All Women's Health Services in Portland and Eugene, Oregon; the Sexual Assault Center, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Jeanette Rankin Foundation, Athens, Georgia. She is also a member of the Feminist Majority Foundation's ""Women's Commission for Congressional Oversight"" and A.P.D. Citizen Review Panel.; Founded in California in 1971 by Carol Downer (1933-) and Lorraine Rothman (1932-2007), the Feminist Women's Health Center was established to empower women through self-knowledge, education and self-help groups. The Atlanta Feminist Women's Health Center was established in 1977. Its mission is to ""provide accessible, comprehensive gynecological healthcare to all who need it without judgment. As innovative healthcare leaders, [they] work collaboratively within [their] community and nationally to promote reproductive health, rights and justice. [They] advocate for wellness, uncensored health information and fair public policies by educating the larger community and empowering [their] clients to make their own decisions.""; The United Nations convened the Fourth World Conference on Women, September 4-15, 1995, in Beijing, China, with a Platform for Action that aimed at achieving greater equality and opportunity for women. Three previous World Conferences were held in Mexico City (International Women's Year, 1975), Copenhagen (1980) and Nairobi (1985). 189 governments and more than 5,000 representatives from 2,100 non-governmental organizations participated in the Beijing Conference. The principal themes were the advancement and empowerment of women in relation to women's human rights, women and poverty, women and decision-making, the girl-child, violence against women and other areas of concern. The resulting documents of the Conference are The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. The U.N. Fourth World Conference on Women manifested a global women's movement for change and has been called ""the Woodstock of the women's movement.""; The World Conference on Women was also accompanied by an informal meeting (August 30-September 8) of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This NGO Forum on Women, Beijing '95, brought together thousands of women from around the world to exchange information and ideas, celebrate women's achievements and contributions and draw attention and develop solutions to discrimination facing women world-wide.