The European Union considers very important the ecological agriculture, from the point of view of rural development. The main objective of the agricultural policy of EU regarding rural development is to promote and develop a compatible relationship between agriculture and environment. A succesfull integration of ecological objectives in sectorial policies depends on three different aspects: a carefull projection of the policy frame, a proper applying of the policy and also the monitoring and assessing the policy. The government, civil society and business environment from our country realized the necessity of promoting ecological agriculture. Some steps were already made in this direction and the harmonization proccess with acquis-ul comunitar is almost finished. In order to develope the agroecological sector in Romnia and to improve the competitivity of ecological products on the eport markets need to be identified and implemented following: implementing the legislation elaborate for this sector in order to strengthen the control system through additional measures which have to supervise the controlling and certifying organisms in order to rise the quality of eported products, creating of a special producing, processing and marketing system for ecological products tht will satisfy the internal and external market needs; promoting the export of romanian ecological products through developing research activities, improving trainings for those who act on the ecological sector.
This article is the final part of the complex author's research, and is a continuation of the previously published sections of the article in this journal (DOI:10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.136.140; DOI:10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.3.132.136).In the previous sections, the author examined the features of modern Russian socio-economic state policy in general and its financial component in particular. The answers to the questions were found and a systematic view of the essence of the state socio-economic policy was given. It was shown that the economic potential of the state determines the level of development and use of the three only possible production resources at all times. This is living labor (human resources companies), materialized (past) labour (main production funds) and material and energy resources developed and being in production turnover. Russia, like no other state in the world, has the potential all these production resources for timely, complete and quality provision of reasonable material and spiritual needs of all its citizens.Purpose: the aim of the presented final part of the research is a critical assessment of the tax legislation in force in Russia, and the reasoned justification that a reasonable tax system is an essential tool for sustainable economic growth.Methods: the methodological basis of the research was the General scientific methods of cognition (dialectic; coexistence of historic and logistic approaches; structure and function analysis; expert evaluation of social-economic policy).Results: considering Russia's economic potential and its use, it was noted that the modern state socio-economic policy is contrary to the objective economic laws of the formation of the social state. This creates favorable prerequisites for the formation of state-oligarchic capitalism in Russia, that is, the merging of private business with government officials. In words, this is accompanied by a fierce fight against corruption in the higher echelons of power, but in reality only contributes to its prosperity. Such a socio-economic policy inevitably leads to a greater lag in the economic development of Russia from the advanced post-industrial countries, rolling it to the margins of world development, and the transformation of our state into a raw material appendage and supplier of cheap labor for the progressively developing countries. It is inadmissible not to understand this to persons responsible for state social and economic policy.Conclusions and Relevance: the proposals on improving the Russian state tax policy as one of the most important conceptual bases of the country's successful social and economic development have been developed. When deciding on documents so crucial for the country, it is necessary to be guided not by the lobbying of narrowly departmental and personal interests, but by conceptual scientific bases. They should determine the social and economic effectiveness of such a policy in the development of a society that really strives to achieve the main values in the life of each person: the knowledge of the truth, a longer life expectancy, sufficiency and well-being. ; Данная статья представляет собой заключительную часть комплексного авторского исследования, и является продолжением опубликованныхранееразделовстатьи в этом журнале(DOI:10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.136.140; DOI:10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.3.132.136). В предыдущих разделах автором были рассмотрены особенности современной российской социально-экономической государственной политики в целом и финансовой ее составляющей в частности, были найдены ответы на поставленные вопросы и дан системный взгляд на сущность государственной социальноэкономической политики. Было показано, что экономический потенциал государства определяют уровень развития и использования трех единственно возможных во все времена производственных ресурсов: живого труда (трудовые ресурсы общества), овеществленного (прошлого) труда (основные производственные фонды) и освоенных и находящихся в производственном обороте материально-энергетических ресурсов. Следует заметить, что Россия, как никакое другое государство в мире, потенциально в достатке располагает всеми указанными производственными ресурсами для своевременного, полного и качественного обеспечения разумных материальных и духовных потребностей всех своих граждан.Цель: Целью представленной заключительной части исследования является критическая оценка налогового законодательства, действующего в России, и аргументированное обоснование того, что разумная система налогообложения представляет собой важнейший инструментарий устойчивого экономического роста страны.Методология проведения работы: Методологической основой исследования послужили как общенаучные методы познания (диалектический, сочетание исторического и логического единства, методы структурного и функционального анализа, традиционные приемы экономического анализа и синтеза), так и специфические методы оценки социально-экономической политики. Результаты работы: Рассматривая экономический потенциал России и его использование, было отмечено, что современная государственная социально-экономическая политика идет вразрез с объективными экономическими законами формирования социального государства, создавая благоприятные предпосылки для становления государственно-олигархического капитализма в России, т.е. сращивания частного бизнеса с государственными чиновниками, что на словах сопровождается ожесточенной борьбой с коррупцией в высших эшелонах власти, а в действительности только способствует ее процветанию. Такая социально-экономическая политика неизбежно ведет к большему отставанию экономического развития России от передовых постиндустриальных стран, скатыванию ее на обочину мирового развития, и превращению нашего государства в сырьевой придаток и поставщика дешевой рабочей силы для прогрессивно развивающихся стран. Не понимать этого ответственным за государственную социально-экономическую политику лицам просто недопустимо.Выводы: Разработаны предложения по совершенствованию российской государственной налоговой политики, как одной из самых важных концептуальных основ успешного социально-экономического развития страны. При принятии решений по столь судьбоносным для страны документам необходимо руководствоваться не заинтересованным лоббированием узко ведомственных и личных интересов, а, прежде всего, концептуальными научными основами, определяющими общественную социально-экономическую эффективность такой политики в развитии общества, действительно стремящегося к достижению главных ценностей в жизни каждого человека: познания истины, большей продолжительности жизни, достаточности и благополучия.
In Baltic States, since the 90's of the last century, when was getting independent of state's, attention is increasingly paid to country's regional development and problematic of economical potential. Worldwide, in European Union and so in Latvia the features of ongoing socioeconomic crisis make draw attention to activization around decentralization and focus on questions of regional development more intensively, particularly on search of solutions for research and analysis of a more efficient economical potential and its use in regions and counties.Economical development is the goal not only in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, but also worldwide, in particular, in peripheries, in ulterior territories of countries – in regions. Economic growth of regions and municipalities depends on several factors. One of the most important core factors is reasonable use of the economical potential, using the opportunities of increasing financial capital, attraction of investments to the administrative territory of the municipality or increased economical potential. Regions and counties economic potential mostly depends on actions and activities of the certain county, how well organized, strategically far-reaching and reasonable the available nature, infrastructure , financial, social and other resources are used. Example of state Ireland verifies that approximately during the past 25 years the state has carried out very proper macroeconomical policy, remarking also the fact that many countries had the favourable conditions, but not all of them were able to use them. State of Ireland can be mentioned as a positive state economical and regional development example, as it is also located in remote part of Europe, nevertheless with help of a proper macroeconomic policy and ability to create favourable economical relations with other countries (also outside EU), it is one of the most developed countries in EU. In Ireland's development period three main directions of economical policy can be marked: fiscal stabilization, open conditions ...
The absorption of the communitarian funds constitutes an objective on its own in the post-adherence strategy, taking into consideration the huge contribution that these funds will have in the recovery of the gap between our country and the other European Union member states. Using the European policy of cohesion, the access to these financial resources represents one of the main economical benefits.
Breast cancer is one of the cancers susceptible to screening and early detection through clinical breast examination and mammography. The Department of Statistics of Jordan has estimated it in 2020; there are 1,140,460 women are eligible (40 years and above) for mammography screening where only 13,000 were screened, making it 1.14% of the eligible population. There are limitations to breast screening in Jordan is the cost of mammography. The average cost of the examination for the non-insurance population is $70, which can burden an average Jordanian family compared to their monthly average wage $639. Stakeholders could be working on unifying an affordable cost of mammography examination across all private healthcare facilities in parallel.
Fiscal policy is the tool which is used by national governments to influence the direction of the economy, generally with the goal of promoting health economic growth. Fiscal policy is also used to influence social conduct and the distribution of wealth, to promote the growth and stability of economic activity. In economic terms it involves a compromise between the objective of maintaining fiscal sustainability and the longer term objective of preserving and developing the country's economic infrastructure, its human and social capital.
Organization of sports policy priorities and responsibilities are very different in all Member States, with implications on the flow of financial resources to the lowest level, public financing and sport sponsorship. Sports sponsors return on investment generates benefits for the economy as a result of increased activity on sports events, infrastructure development as well as for employment, quality of life or state and city image formation, creating soft power prospects, generating state competitiveness, more revenue from sports tourism, leisure and other sales sectors. All interested parties are funding sport directly and indirectly. For example, companies pay corporate taxes, which generate income to government, which can invest in the sport. However, the government can also define a fiscal framework that is conducive to private companies investing in the sport, such as tax relief. The goal of the article is to reveal the problems of sports funding system on the theoretical basis for sport sponsorship integration. Results indicate, that sports sector in the EU countries limited by the legal framework and the tax burden when the tax ratio is the demand and supply elasticities regulator. On the other hand, a decrease in costs for sporting events or activities of the organization to obtain more funding for sport, modeling macroeconomic legal and tax environment, can provide more opportunities for return on investment for sponsors within the larger media publicity contracts, licensing business expansion, thus generating more sales for sponsors, ensuring higher tax collection in the budget, the growing GDP and social capital development. DOI:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p128
Arghirescu, Ch. Geographical survey of Roumania.--Teodoresca, I. Agricultural Roumania.--Iscu, Basile. The mineral riches of Roumania.--Bungetianu, Const. The forests in Roumania and their exploitation.--Fundeteanu, engineer. The problem of Roumania's energy and economy.--Slăvescu, Victor. General consideration on the industry of Roumania.--Angelescu, I.N. Public finances and the monetary situation in Roumania.--Dimitrescu, J.N. The comerciall [1] policy of Roumania during the period after the war (1919-1926).--Ioanitescu, D.R. The labour legislation in Roumania. ; Mode of access: Internet.
