Do unconventional forms of citizen participation add value to the quality of democracy in Germany?: a case study of the Bürgerdialog Energietechnologien für die Zukunft
In: Empowering citizens: studies in collaborative democracy, S. 17-105
"An increased dissatisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany can be observed. Citizens have voiced their frustration over a broad range of political decisions and there is a recurring demand for more citizen participation. This study aims to answer whether unconventional forms of citizen participation add value to the quality of democracy in Germany. For the purpose of this work, conventional forms of citizen participation are differentiated from unconventional forms by the following three criteria: a mechanism is conventional if it is executed, recognized, and institutionalized by the government of the respective (geographical and political) level it takes place in. In order to answer the research question, the theoretical foundation is first presented. Next, an overview of the evolution of democracy in general is given, before exploring the grounds on which Germany's version of democracy solidified. Then the concept of citizen participation is elaborated and a new classification is introduced. In the third section of the theoretical part, the following three `channels' through which unconventional citizen participation can potentially add value to the quality of democracy in Germany are identified: by contributing to equality, democratic learning, and the effectiveness of policy-making. The causal model presented in the final chapter of the theoretical part specifies the underlying mechanism through which, in our interpretation, unconventional citizen participation potentially adds value to the quality of democracy in Germany. Based on the causal mechanism assumed, three sub-hypotheses for answering the main hypo-thesis are chosen. While this theoretical framework can be applied to various forms of unconventional citizen participation, the methodology chapter details why this single case study best fits this research design. Furthermore, the selection of the 2011 Bürgerdialog Energietechnologien für die Zukunft (Citizen Dialogue on the Future Use of Energy Technologies), commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) is justified as the appropriate case for empirical analysis. In the case study, all three channels are analyzed for whether the citizen dialogue met the preconditions needed to most likely achieve an added value. Then the study assesses whether value has in fact been added to the quality of democracy. The analysis is completed by a summary of the findings in the context of the case, i.e. the citizen dialogue, and a discussion of how far these findings can be transposed to mechanisms of unconventional citizen participations in general. On that basis, the study concludes with a set of policy recommendations." (author's abstract)