Empirical Methods in Contract Law
In: RESEARCH METHODS IN CONTRACT LAW AND SCHOLARSHIP, Yuliya Chernykh and Joshua Karton, eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024
26222 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: RESEARCH METHODS IN CONTRACT LAW AND SCHOLARSHIP, Yuliya Chernykh and Joshua Karton, eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024
SSRN
In: Critical Theory and Methodology Critical theory and methodology, S. 226-247
In: NBER Working Paper No. t0329
SSRN
In: Journal of international economics, Band 27, Heft 1-2, S. 191-196
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 174, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 1614-0559
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 174, Heft 1, S. 24
ISSN: 1614-0559
In: 46 Arizona State Law Journal 1405 (2014)
SSRN
Regression methods are commonly used in competition lawsuits for, e.g., determining overcharges in pricefixing cases. Technical evaluations of these methods' pros and cons are not necessarily intuitive. Appraisals that are based on case studies are descriptive but need not be universally valid. This paper opens up the black box called econometrics for competition cases. This is done by complementing theoretical arguments with estimation results. These results are obtained for data that is generated by a simulation-model of a collusive industry. Using such data leaves little room for debate about the quality of these methods because estimates of, e.g., overcharges can be compared to their true underlying values. This analysis provides arguments for demonstrating that thoroughly conducted econometric analyses yield better results than simple techniques such as before-and-after comparisons.
BASE
In: Comparative Law Review, Special Issue, Vol. 12/2, Rescuing Comparative Law and Economics? Exploring Successes and Failures of an Interdisciplinary Experiment (G. Bellantuono, ed.) 2023.
SSRN
In: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2013,1
In: Recent economic thought series
In: Review of social economy: the journal for the Association for Social Economics, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 133-142
ISSN: 1470-1162
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 5328
SSRN