Law enforcement is the process of enforcing or trying to implement legal norms as guides for traffic or legal relations in social and state life. In the environmental law enforcement system in Indonesia, there are three legal aspects described in the Environmental Protection and Management Act (UUPPLH), namely administrative law, civil law, and criminal law aspects. Where each aspect's law enforcement and law enforcement processes are distinct. The research method used was normative legal research. One component of environmental law enforcement is the use of civil law in environmental management. In the Environmental Protection and Management Act (UUPPLH) the process of enforcing environmental law through civil procedures is regulated in Chapter XIII Articles 84 to 93. In order to provide legal clarity in law enforcement, efforts are being made to solve environmental problems that emerge in Indonesia. Environmental law enforcement is an endeavor to ensure that regulations and requirements in general and specific legal provisions are followed and implemented through administrative, civil, and criminal supervision and enforcement. With the adoption of the first environmental rules, namely Law Number 4 of 1982 Concerning Basic Provisions for Environmental Management (UUKPPLH), government policy frameworks in implementing environmental law were actualized. Then, it was later replaced by Law Number 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management (UUPLH), which was subsequently replaced by Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) (Tude Trisnajaya, 2013: 2). The research method used in this study was normative juridical research, which means it was done with an eye on the laws, rules, and court decisions that were relevant to the topic. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Environment, Legal Norms, Dispute Resolution.
Even at the level of scholarly or diplomatic argumentation it is important to inquire into the competing interests and legal factors involved in the atmospheric tests. This is true not only because differing political expectations or even measures might depend on the consensus as to the legality or illegality of the French tests, but also because the precedential value of the tests will be of greater or less force depending upon whether there is agreement at the time of the tests that France was or was not acting within her international legal rights.
Public documents include letters and petitions for and against further development of the Arizona Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission records over rezoning, information regarding the U.S. Forest Service's Decision concerning the sale and development of the land adjacent to the skiing and recreational area, and a recent history of Arizona Snow Bowl. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
Public documents include letters and petitions for and against further development of the Arizona Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission records over rezoning, information regarding the U.S. Forest Service's Decision concerning the sale and development of the land adjacent to the skiing and recreational area, and a recent history of Arizona Snow Bowl. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
Katie Lee wrote to Senator Barry Goldwater in July 1954 after returning from a Glen Canyon boat trip. Knowing his connection to the area and love of photography, she asked him to explain his reasoning for approving the construction of Glen Canyon Dam. He replied that, while a difficult decision, it was for the greater good of supplying power to many people. Sprang acquired these copies from Katie Lee. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Dick Sprang came to Sedona, Arizona in May 1946, from Ohio, eager to explore the canyon country of northern Arizona and southern Utah. He remained in Sedona until 1956, hiking the backcountry, taking aerial photographs, and running the Colorado River in Glen Canyon. In 1952, together with Dudy Thomas and Harry Aleson, Sprang founded Canyon Surveys, a series of trips in Glen Canyon designed to map the geology, archeology, and flora and fauna of the soon-to-be dammed region. In 1957, Sprang moved to a ranch in Wayne County, Utah, where he ran cattle and continued exploring the slick rock country of southern Utah. He returned to Arizona (Prescott) in 1973 where he remained until his death in 2000. Sprang s years of research and exploration, writings and drawings earned him a reputation as an expert on the canyon country.
This issue covers the opening of the Moorhead Information Center, ceremonies for Highway Patrol school graduates, and the study of the impact of driving habits on air pollution. Minnesota Highways was the official employee newsletter of the Minnesota Department of Highways (1951-1976).
CONTENT: Media clippings concerning the 'Save the Peaks' controversy, 1971-1973, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
Related documents and notes concerning the "Save the Peaks" controversy, 1971-1974, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
CONTENT: Anti-development correspondence concerning the 'Save the Peaks' controversy, 1971-1974, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
A questionnaire from the Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Hart Prairie and a questionnaire from the Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission, regarding the "Save the Peaks" controversy. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
Correspondence between Joe Moser, Barry Goldwater and Arizona Representative John J. Rhodes, February 1961. Moser, who had previous contact with Goldwater, sent a letter in February 1961 asking him to reconsider plans for smaller dams designed to protect Rainbow Bridge. He suggests that Goldwater, instead, consider Dr. Woodbury's report and Dick Sprang's suggestions for protection. Moser also sent a copy to Arizona Representative John J. Rhodes. The letter to Goldwater from Moser is a copy. The two letters from Goldwater and Rhodes are originals with signatures. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Dick Sprang came to Sedona, Arizona in May 1946, from Ohio, eager to explore the canyon country of northern Arizona and southern Utah. He remained in Sedona until 1956, hiking the backcountry, taking aerial photographs, and running the Colorado River in Glen Canyon. In 1952, together with Dudy Thomas and Harry Aleson, Sprang founded Canyon Surveys, a series of trips in Glen Canyon designed to map the geology, archeology, and flora and fauna of the soon-to-be dammed region. In 1957, Sprang moved to a ranch in Wayne County, Utah, where he ran cattle and continued exploring the slick rock country of southern Utah. He returned to Arizona (Prescott) in 1973 where he remained until his death in 2000. Sprang s years of research and exploration, writings and drawings earned him a reputation as an expert on the canyon country.
CONTENT: Correspondence concerning the 'Save the Peaks' controversy, 1964-1972, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
Newspaper articles and letters to the editor, from the Arizona Daily Sun, 1970-1972, regarding the "Save the Peaks" controversy, which concerned the development of Hart Prairie in the San Francisco Peaks region. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
International audience ; Cuba is a tropical island lying 1 50 kilometres on a straight linefrom the South of the United States. It extends over an area onefifth of that of France and its population is about one sixth ofthat of France. Up to now it has lived almost exclusively on itssugar exports, more than half of which were accepted by the UnitedStates at a specially favourable rate. The lack of economic balancecaused by this sugar-cane single crop and this over-specializedtrade, was such that Cuba, instead ofproducing the mostelementary goods (viz, vegetables, fruit, meat, cigarettes), withouteven mentioning industrial and forest products, had to import them.Besides, this single culture and sugar trade were in the hands ofa small minority of owners, half of which were of foreign origin.More than 50 fir, of the land belonged to less than 1 % of the populationand 894 holdings covered 36,1 % of the land.The forests of Cuba formerly large and rich, had suffered morethan any other natural resource from this sugar-cane single culture.Most of them had been cleared up with a view to cultivation whilethe remainder growing on rather poor soil, had been depleted withoutany regard to its conservation. As a matter of fact, exportingsugar and importing forest products, even at prohibitive prices, wasdeemed preferable. Therefore, Cuba imported 80 Jo of the forestproducts it consumed (firewood and charcoal excepted).As a result of these abuses, forests in Cuba, serve but imperfectlythe double purpose of production and protection which shouldnormally fall to it.Dr Fidel Castro's regime which was settled on January 1st 1959,is aware of the seriousness of forest problems in Cuba. Its forestpolicy is part of its general economic policy which aims at diversifyingthe production in every field and industrializing the country.The basic political or economic means used to reach that aim are:an agrarian reform, the organization of production on a colectivebasis, under strict state supervision.As far as forestry is concerned, in particular, everything is atpresent carried out by the State on land expropriated in compliancewith the agrarian reform.To meet the requirements of an ambitious economic .program andowing to the scarcity of foreign exchange stock, the Cuban Government is unfortunately on its way towards the depletion of its.few remaining forests. Here is the negative aspect of this forestpolicy, which must be deplored, but cannot perhaps be avoided. Butit has also its positive aspect, represented by an extensive and spectacularprogram of artificial plantations considered in a way as treeculture.In 1960, for example, more than 12 000 ha have been planted witheucalypts, after preliminary ploughing and fertilization, and it is likelythat in 1961 an area twice as large will be planted. Though upto now the main species has been Eucalyptus saligna, there is atendency to ;plant Pinos caribaea, more and more, because it is muchmore suitable.As a matter of fact, Cuba, with its rich soil, its warm and moistclimate, offers conditions extremely favourable to tropical and subtropicalcultures and to forests.If the policy outlined here is carried into effect systematically andaccording to a coordinated plan, in 10 to 20 years hence, Cuba islikely to be able to produce a large portion of the forest raw materialsnecessary to its consumption and to the manufacture of sawn timber,pulp. and paper, artificial silk, fiber and particle boards, etc.At the same time, it would spare a large amount of foreign exchangestock and would provide work for a population, most ofwhich has no activity beyond the 100 clays per year which correspondto the period of sugar-cane crop, and would derive profits fromnow unproductive land. ; Cuba est une île tropicale située à 150 kilomètres en ligne droiteau Sud des États-Unis. Sa surface est environ le 1/5 (le celle dela France et sa population, environ le 1/6. Jusqu'à ce jour, elle avécu presque exclusivement de ses. exportations de sucre dont plusde la moitié était acceptée à un de faveur par les Etats-Unis.Le déséquilibre entraîné par cette monoculture de la canne à sucreet ce commerce spécialisé à l'extrême, était tel que Cuba importait,alors qu'elle aurait pu les produire, les biens les plus élémentaires(légumes, fruits, viandes, cigarettes) sans parler bien entendit desproduits industriels et forestiers.En outre, cette monoculture et ce commerce du sucre étaiententre les mains d'une très faible minorité dont la moitié était denationalité étrangère. Plus de 50 % de la terre appartenait ft moinsde 1 % de la population et 894 propriétés occupaient 36,1 % de laterre.Autrefois riches et vastes, les forêts de Cuba avaient souffert,plus que toute autre richesse, de la monoculture de la canne à sucre:on en avait défriché une grande partie en vue de la culture,tandis que le reste, dont le sol était peu fertile, avait été épuisé sansqu'on sc préoccupe de sa conservation. On préférait en effet exporterdu sucre et importer, fût-.e à des prix exhorbitants, les produitsforestiers. Cuba importait donc 80 % des produits forestiers qu'elleconsommait (bois de feu et charbon de bois exclus).Le résultat de tous ces abus est qu'actuellement la forêt ne remplità Cuba que de façon très imparfaite les fonctions de production etde protection qui, normalement. devraient lui revenir.Le régime du Docteur Fidel CASTRO qui s'est installé le 1er janvier1959, est conscient de la gravité du problème forestier à Cuba.Sa politique forestière entre dans le cadre de sa politique économiquegénérale qui tend it diversifier la production dans tous lesdomaines et à industrialiser le pays. Les moyens de caractère politiqueou économique employés pour y arriver sont fondamentalement:la réforme agraire et l'organisation de la production sur unebase collectiviste, caractérisée par un étroit contrôle de l'État.Du point de vue forestier, en particulier, tout est actuellementréalisé par l'Etat sur les terres expropriées au titre de la réformeagraire. Pour faire face aux exigences d'un programme économique ambitieuxet en raison de la rareté des devises, le Gouvernement cubains'achemine malheureusement vers l'épuisement des rares forêts quiexistent encore. C'est l'aspect négatif, regrettable mais peut-êtreinévitable, de cette politique forestière. Mais elle a aussi son aspectpositif, représenté par l'énorme et spectaculaire programme de plantationsartificielles considérées un peu comme des cultures d'arbres.En 1960, par exemple, on a planté à Cuba, avec labour préalableet emploi d'engrais, plus de 12 000 hectares d'eucalyptus et il estprobable qu'en 1961 on en aura planté le double.Bien que jusqu'alors on ait principalement utilisé Eucalyptus saligna,on s'oriente de plus en plus vers la plantation de Pijius caribaoaqui présente bien plus d'avantages.En réalité, avec ses bonnes terres, son climat chaud et humide,Cuba présente des conditions extraordinairement favorables pourtoutes les cultures tropicales ou subtropicales et pour la forêt.Si la politique ainsi esquissée est mise en oeuvre de façon méthodiqueet selon un plan coordonné, il est probable que Cuba pourra,d'ici 10 à 20 ans, produire une grande partie des matières premièresforestières qu'elle consomme et qui sont nécessaires, en particulier,à la fabrication de sciages, de pâte et de papier, de rayonne, de»anneaux, etc.En même temps, elle économiserait une grande quantité de deviseset donnerait du travail à une population dont une grandepartie n'est active que durant les 100 jours annuels représentés parla durée de la récolte de la canne à sucre et rendrait productifs desterrains qui, actuellement, ne le sont pas.
CONTENT: Preliminary report entitled, 'Man-Land Relationships on the San Francisco Peaks,' by John Duncklee. This report describes the varies ecosystems on the San Francisco Peaks and the environmental impact man has had on them in the past. It also give projections on what further impact man may have on them and discusses spiritual and religious aspects of the Peaks. Document includes photographs (missing) and a bibliography. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.
