Ethics Committees in Asia
In: Politeia. Notizie di Politeia, Band 18, Heft 67, S. 120-122
ISSN: 1128-2401
897 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politeia. Notizie di Politeia, Band 18, Heft 67, S. 120-122
ISSN: 1128-2401
In: Politeia. Notizie di Politeia, Band 18, Heft 67, S. 54-59
ISSN: 1128-2401
In: Social work: a journal of the National Association of Social Workers, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 188-192
ISSN: 1545-6846
In: The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 74-93
SSRN
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 243-244
ISSN: 1537-5935
In: PS, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 243-244
ISSN: 2325-7172
In: Agenda: a journal of policy analysis & reform, Band 10, Heft 2
ISSN: 1447-4735
In: Politeia. Notizie di Politeia, Band 18, Heft 67, S. 123-138
ISSN: 1128-2401
In: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE ; an international journal, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 67-73
ISSN: 1556-2654
Human research ethics has developed in both theory and practice mostly from experiences in medical research. Human participants, however, are used in a much broader range of research than ethics committees oversee, including both basic and applied research at technical universities. Although mandated in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, non-medical research involving humans need not receive ethics review in much of Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Our survey of the top 50 technical universities in the world shows that, where not specifically mandated by law, most technical universities do not employ ethics committees to review human studies. As the domains of basic and applied sciences expand, ethics committees are increasingly needed to guide and oversee all such research regardless of legal requirements. We offer as examples, from our experience as an ethics committee in a major European technical university, ways in which such a committee provides needed services and can help ensure more ethical studies involving humans outside the standard medical context. We provide some arguments for creating such committees, and in our supplemental article, we provide specific examples of cases and concerns that may confront technical, engineering, and design research, as well as outline the general framework we have used in creating our committee.
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 45-56
ISSN: 1527-2001
Institutional ethics committees (lECs) in health care facilities now create moral policy, provide moral education, and consult with physicians and other health care workers. After sketching reasons for the development of IECs, this paper first examines the predominant moral standards it is often assumed lECs are now using, these standards being neo-Kantian principles of justice and utilitarian principles of the greatest good. Then, it is argued that a feminine ethics of care, as posited by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings, is an unacknowledged basis for /EC discussions and decisions. Further, it is suggested that feminine ethics of care can and should provide underlying theoretical tools and standards for lECs.
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 272-276
ISSN: 1537-5935
In: PS, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 272-276
ISSN: 2325-7172
In: PS, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 904-906
ISSN: 2325-7172
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 904-906
ISSN: 1537-5935
In: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE ; an international journal, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 93-94
ISSN: 1556-2654