Suchergebnisse

This article analyzes the technological approach to the understanding and realisation of innovation. Modern focus on the so-called "effective management" in the government essentially demoralizing Russian officials. Overcoming the crisis of managerialism author sees in the implementation of a coherent and consistent human resources policy based on the humanization of government

It is the try comparing the Plato's, Plotinus's, Hegel's, Marx-Engels's dialectics systems in the case of the relationship between matter and idea and creation of new thingslead's principle (the circle's move and the opposites' struggle), but both of this systems was had the two principles. There is genetic similarity in the Plato's and Plotinus's, Hegel's and Marx-Engels's dialectics systems. But the Plato's and Hegel's, Plotinus's and Marx-Engels's have matter's similarity: the development in the first system produce by the circles' move, the development in the second system produce by the opposites' struggle. Directly idea goes into matter's and idea's dialectic in Plato's and Hegel's philosophy, but indirectly is it in Plotinus's and Marx-Engels's philosophy (it is thanks to the energy and activity).

В статье дан краткий исторический анализ понятию
толерантность. В современном обществе толерантность чаще всего имеет
религиозную и духовную направленность. При этом немаловажную роль
занимает смещение вектора толерантности в сторону тоталитаризма.
Понятие толерантность как свободомыслие и свобододуховность человека
подменяется возвеличиванием, абсолютизацией свободы любой
индивидуальности, что ведет к отрицанию моральных принципов и в итоге
свобода перейдет во вседозволенность.

The author pay attention on the problem еthic of the sufism in the relative field ethos, when the ethical thought … the man experience the difficultys in the cultural and spiritual attitude, anexample for his the gods, to spend the time in the intence reconnaissance raid of the meaning life and further life program. Trying to save his individuality, the man long the best shape, but no strugle with the realism, for touch the ethical sufism. The different cultures and the different traditions, inherent to the peoples of the Russia, compile the unity carpet of the unitycultur field of the ethoc. Showing influence jn the each concrete man, the ethos how the general ways and manners of the mankind – has the right to give for him the suchas field of the activities, the such as possibility for the interaction with another culturs, which can to fortify in him the belief the hope on the further perspective of the life, in which no was sinking performance and more concrete useful and construction actions, so need the further time. The unity of the culture must to bring to the allworld, global prossec: from integration – to the trancformation of the social structures.

The article examines the nature of time and relationship human and time on the Kantian position and modern physical basic. There are made the conclusion of the moral and aesthetic essence of time, the immanence of the good in time. There are compare the classical and post-modern understanding of time, analyzed different concepts of time. In the article human understand like a moral and free thing, personality and individuality (like understand human by German philosopher Kant).

There are analyzes the relation of the dialectic and deconstruction, examined various version of their relationship. There are make next conclusions. Every system of philosophy is dialectic (develops itself) and deconstruction (it is finding the weakness of previous systems and "mistakes" in them). Postmodern philosophy doubles metaphysics, dialectics, deconstruction: they become "classic" and "postmodern". "Postmodern" is a double of the deconstruction of the "classical" dialectics. "Deconstruction" tries to replace the dialectic on its "metaphysical" double. Deconstruction is a reformatting of the object (the disappearance of previous and appearance of a new which based on it) and dialectic which has come to its end, the edge, the absurd.

The article examines the monograph Derrida "On Grammatology". The focus is on anti-rational nature of postmodern philosophy. The Derrida's monography was analyzed in a broad historical and philosophical context. The Derrida's monography was written in the dialectic of replenish the flaw, culture replenish nature. Derrida understand nature as the unconscious and instinctive, and as a phonetic language. Nature is opposed to culture, writing language is opposed phonetic. The writing transforms language into a simulacrum.

This article examined deception like a game in the ontological, epistemological, existential, ethical, legal, aesthetic aspects. Emphasis gives to the aesthetic aspect: aesthetics needs saving mystery of beauty essence. Aesthetic shown with an example of the game of the actor on the stage, while the everyday life of the people more and more like a game of the actor on the stage. There is shown that any deception - is always a game, any game - is a deception, because deception and the game alienate and mediate reality, because the reality becomes unauthentic understanding of the world.

This article examined the role of freedom for life and belief in the context of postmodern philosophy through the prism of concepts of "simulacrum" and "double (similar)". There is examined the relationship of freedom in classical and postmodern philosophies. There is examined interaction of the two poles of the modern world (post-modern and classical) in the framework of the policy of multiculturalism and tolerance through the prism of concepts of "simulacrum" and "twin". There is make the conclusion about the absence of ontological reason for being and belief as being replaced by chaos, and belief is impossible without free will and thinking, which are replaced by machine of desire, spontaneity, that is associated with decoding the discourses and decrease the role of culture in human life.

The article examined the dispute about the ideas between Aristotle and Plato as one of the cause of start of postmodern philosophy. Aristotle identified the idea (eidos) and form, which is cause of equating of the reality of the discourse and immanentization of being and apology of hedonism and the ambition of pleasure. The absence of a dialectical relationship between form and substance in the philosophy of Aristotle, and, in fact, the equation things and its form, that provides the degeneration of the original ideas in the simulacrum. Plato's opinion differed from the opinion of the opinion about the ideas of Aristotle. The idea determines the form of things, but not identical to it. The idea is transcendent, but not immanent of things. Aristotle's philosophy in its historical and philosophical deployment provided absence of truth, but not its being.