Suchergebnisse

Performing Philippine studies / J. Neil C. Garcia -- Ang sarili sa digma, ang digma sa sarili / Laurence Marvin S. Castillo -- Kung papaano umalpas sa panahon / Christian Jil R. Benitez -- Kung bakit mahalaga ang pangungulit sa nobela / Chuckberry J. Pascual -- Katawan ni Guillermo / U Z. Eliserio -- Ang operasyon, and aparisyon, at ang Pilipinang kalakal / Tilde Acuña -- Hamlet and his problems of politeness / Thomas David F. Chaves -- Magical metonymies / Dominic Paul Chow Sy -- Toward the unsurmountable you / Christian Jil R. Benitez -- In the age of anthropocene and CMICT / Raul Pertierra -- Translation and the problem of realism in Philippine literature in English / J. Neil C. Garcia

Issues and perspectives in theology and religious education -- The vision of Matthew / Ricardo M. Puno -- Christianity and culture in Asia / Jose M. de Mesa -- Pangangatawan, ang 'spirituality' sa kontekstong Pilipino / Jose M. de Mesa -- The interface of science and religion in the theology of Rosemary Radford Ruether / Dominador Bombongan, Jr. -- Explaining behavioral misconduct, an ecological framework / Ferdinand D. Dagmang -- The Lasallian youth, a study on belief, morals and social conscience / Jesusa Marco & Arnold Monera -- Empirical explorations, student constructs of suffering / Rito V. Baring -- The Catholic University and cosmopolitan ideals / Dominador Bombongan, Jr. -- The Catholic social teachings in the University, implications for Catholic education / Ferdinand D. Dagmang

In Belgium, the idea of 'openness' is a well spread notion in electoral political discourses and the 2012 local election in Wallonia is no exception to this trend. Despite a clear victory, it is indeed very common for local political leaders in Belgium to announce that they will open their majority to other lists. The idea of 'openness' is also part of the local electoral campaign in terms of recruitment: non-partisan candidates – who clearly want to distinguish themselves from the party – are recruited to figure on the lists as 'independent candidates'. They are called 'candidates d'ouverture' as a sign of openness towards the civil society, the opposition, or dissidents from other political parties. Actually, these candidates are recruited for various reasons: there are sometimes used to demonstrate the citizen character of the list, to enhance the fact that the list 'makes politics differently from established political parties', to underline the local roots of the list, and sometimes the 'candidates d'ouverture' are simply used to complete vacancies on a list.

The name of a party is an important dimension of its political position. Often, the label used by a political party in its name tells much about its ideology. But, since in most cases, only a few parties compete for each election it is difficult to undertake large qualitative and quantitative analyses of party names. Local elections can provide an interesting option, however. Indeed, in several cases, we find lots of different names, and not only the usual national party labels. In the last local elections in Wallonia, one of the three Belgian Regions, 1012 lists were in competition. Such data provide a fertile ground for analysis. To study the name of the lists, we proceed in two steps. First, we build a typology of the names. We classify the lists in different categories: lists with national party name, lists with a clear reference to a national party, lists with an ideological label, lists with a clear reference to the commune's name, lists with a reference to the communal level but also lists with a reference to democracy, to a union or alliance, to change and an alternative way of doing politics, to the future, with puns, and with a reference to a person. In the second step, using multinomial regressions, we show where the different types of lists can be found and above all we look at their electoral performances and thus test the hypothesis whether the party name matters or not.

The EUROSUR system is supposed to further the surveillance of external borders of European Union Member States. From this point of view, it can be considered an important step in the construction of a controlled space. Drawing inspiration from the Foucauldian attention to programs and technologies, and mobilizing the Actor- Network-Theory concepts of setting and actant, the paper investigates EUROSUR main methodological operations. It highlights how the making of a controlled space is, first and foremost, a mise-en-discours going well beyond surveillance and pro- hibition: a continuous effort to make sense of a disparate multiplicity, encompassing both human and nonhuman elements, both controlled and controlling ones. From a theoretical perspective, the chapter contributes to on-going endeavors to reinvigor- ate the post-structuralist studies of International Relations with approaches inspired by Actor-Network-Theory.

Different models of democracy have been thought to make collective decisions: representative, participatory, deliberative or elitist, to give a few but the main ones. These models are justified, criticized, transformed by political theorists. But what do citizens expect from democracy? Since the beginning of the 2000s, an increasing number of studies are interested by citizens' attitudes towards democratic models. What do they think about the mechanism of election and delegation, the idea of a more participatory democracy, the role of political parties and the ideal place of experts in the democracy of tomorrow? However empirical studies provide contradictory results. Some considers that citizens don't want to participate more (Hibbing & Theiss-Morse, 2002), while others argue that they are looking for new opportunities of involvement (Neblo, Esterling, Kennedy, Lazer, & Sokhey, 2010). Researchers begin to analyze this element in the European context and the objective of this paper is to present the case of Belgium. Relying on the PARTIREP voter survey of 2014 we analyze three dimensions of this issue. First, we map the attitudes towards different kinds of democratic models in Belgium. Second, we seek to explain why people develop these different preferences. Third, we compare the result in the North and in South to look if the different political dynamics in Walloon and Flanders are related to different public attitudes towards democracy.