The european court of human rights and minority rights
In: Journal of European integration, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 249-272
ISSN: 0703-6337
551626 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of European integration, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 249-272
ISSN: 0703-6337
In: Forthcoming in LEGITIMACY AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS (Harlan Cohen & Nienke Grossman eds., Cambridge University Press 2015)
SSRN
In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law, 2019
SSRN
In: Published in: Christophe Geiger, Craig A. Nard and Xavier Seuba (eds.), "Intellectual Property and the Judiciary", EIPIN series Vol. 4, Cheltenham (UK)/Northampton, MA (USA), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 9-90.
SSRN
Working paper
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 247
SSRN
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 176-200
ISSN: 1085-794X
The social psychological theory of procedural justice emphasizes the fundamental importance of procedural fairness judgments in shaping citizens' satisfaction and compliance with the outcome of a legal process and in strengthening the legitimacy of legal institutions. This article explores the benefit of applying procedural justice criteria (participation, neutrality, respect, and trust) in human rights adjudication, with a particular focus on the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). It is argued that the ECtHR should take these criteria into account both at the level of its own proceedings and in evaluating how human rights have been dealt with at the domestic level.
In: Helmut Philipp Aust and Esra Demir-Gürsel (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights: Current Challenges in Historical Perspective, Edward Elgar 2021, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: International journal of human rights, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 98-153
ISSN: 1364-2987
In: International journal of human rights, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 132-149
ISSN: 1364-2987
In: International journal of human rights, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 101-131
ISSN: 1364-2987
In: International journal of human rights, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 93-158
ISSN: 1364-2987
In: Journal of Law and Religion, Band 26, S. 101
SSRN
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 268-322
ISSN: 1930-6571
On September 12, 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) ruled in Nada v. Switzerland that the implementation by Switzerland of the United Nations Security Council Al-Qaida Sanctions Regime violated the right to private and family life under Article 8, and the right to an effective remedy under Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
In: Human rights law review, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 57-79
ISSN: 1744-1021
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 12-34
ISSN: 1930-6571
The case was referred to the Court in accordance with the provisions applicable prior to the entry into force of Protocol No.11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention")1 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") on 30 October 1999 (Article 5 § 4 of Protocol No. 11 and former Articles 47 and 48 of the Convention).