Popular Democracy and the European Union Polity
In: Politologija, Band 3(59, S. 180-184
ISSN: 1392-1681
Adapted from the source document.
386 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politologija, Band 3(59, S. 180-184
ISSN: 1392-1681
Adapted from the source document.
In: Politička misao, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 91-109
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 5-25
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 531-545
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 80-106
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 71, Heft 3, S. 361-386
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 159-187
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Politologija, Heft 70, S. 64-96
ISSN: 1392-1681
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 498-526
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online
In: Politologija, Heft 4, S. 23-86
ISSN: 1392-1681
Negotiation for the next EU budget was one of the most important & complex issues for Lithuania & other EU member states during the first three years after the EU enlargement of 2004. During the negotiation Lithuania could rely on some experience acquired at the time of EU accession. However, the crucial difference between these two negotiations was that the acceding countries did not have voice (veto power) when discussing the terms of their future EU membership. This article describes the dynamics of the negotiation in 2004-2005 over the next EU budget & tries to address the paradox that, despite the microphone & a place at the negotiating table, negotiation for Lithuania (and most of other EU new member states) by & large ended according to the accession scenario. The article also discusses the likely directions of the EU budget review & options of its modification, as well as implications for Lithuania. Adapted from the source document.
In: Politologija, Band 4(64, S. 3-22
ISSN: 1392-1681
It is a common perception that 20 years after the fall of communism, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CCEE), even though they have joined the EU, belong to the group of post-communist countries. This article analyses whether a clear distinction in the quality of democracy between the CCEE, which are new member states of the EU, and the old member states still could be made. The analysis has been performed by comparison of the democracy indicators of the countries of Southern Europe, Nordic countries and the CCEE. The research has revealed that the scores of democracy indicators of the countries of Southern Europe and the CCEE do not differ significantly, and in some cases, the scores of the group of the CCEE correspond to a better quality of democracy. The scores of democracy indicators of the individual countries of the two groups overlap in most cases. However, the analysis has exhibited a considerable difference of the democracy indicators between the countries of Southern Europe and Nordic countries, although these countries belong to the group of the old member states of the EU. Thus, the difference in the scores of democracy indicators inside the group of the old member states of the EU is bigger than the difference between the CCEE and the countries of Southern Europe. This means that the requirements for the quality of democracy, which are applied to mature Western democracies, have to be applied to the CCEE. Adapted from the source document.
In: Politička misao, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 267-269
World Affairs Online
In: Politologija, Heft 4, S. 165-190
ISSN: 1392-1681
The dynamics of the attitudes towards Lithuania's membership in the EU could be divided into three periods: decreasing number of membership supporters till the beginning of 2000 (distrust in state institutions, lack of information, economical fears), increasing support till referendum (informational campaign, beliefs in positive impact on economy) and stable support of membership after referendum & accession. The main positive changes according to public opinion are possibilities to work abroad & reduced unemployment. The main negative change is rise of prices. Rise of prices was the main reason of skeptical attitudes towards euro introduction. On the other hand, according to Eurobarometer Lithuania, is one of the most euro-optimistic countries. Public opinion polls in EU show that attitudes towards Lithuania are positive. Adapted from the source document.
In: Politička misao, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 218-219
World Affairs Online
In: Međunarodni problemi: Meždunarodnye problemy, Band 69, Heft 1, S. 126-150
ISSN: 0025-8555
World Affairs Online