Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 89-108
ISSN: 0020-577X
202 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 89-108
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 4, S. 161-164
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 171-174
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 375-408
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 3, S. 143-156
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 109-122
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 65, Heft 2, S. 301-305
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 563-567
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 333-337
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 69, Heft 3, S. 547-551
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 113-116
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 413-425
ISSN: 0020-577X
While a number of answers have been given by election research and electoral sociology why Norway is not a part of the European Union there is still room for alternative perspectives. An important but overlooked reason might be how the Norwegian population sees itself in the European context. Norwegians view themselves as open, small and healthy group, whereas they view Europe as a closed, large and sick entity. This view has not developed overnight, but is an outgrowth of largely historical reasons that date as far back as year 1660 and were strengthened by the events that took place in both the 19th and 20th century. L. Pitkaniemi
In: http://lauda.ulapland.fi/handle/10024/61109
Turkey first applied for EU membership in 1987 and started negotiations for full membership in October 2005 after lengthy and challenging negotiations between EU member states. This master's thesis attempts to examine the relationship between the negotiations for EU membership that are going on between Turkey and the EU Commission and the public discussion on the subject. The research material consists of selected posts on the Financial Times discussion forum and the Acquis communautaire and Copenhagen criteria. By comparing the research material this thesis attempts to investigate if the public deliberation and official negotiations focus on the same issues and requirements for membership. The theoretical background for this analysis is deliberative democracy, according to which public debate should be a prerequisite for agenda setting and decision making. The findings of the thesis reveal that the public discussion does touch on the acquis communautaire and Copenhagen criteria to some degree, but the public is also concerned with non-acquis issues such as the culture and history. A unique feature of the accession negotiations is also the amount of commentary from heads of state regarding the negotiations, which was also noted in the research material. In the light of deliberative democratic theory it can be noted that the public may take part in the discussion over Turkey's membership, but it has little or no chances of setting the agenda for the negotiations.
BASE
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 215-243
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Nytt norsk tidsskrift, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 459-463
ISSN: 1504-3053