A review of state travel, follow-up ; Follow-up
Of the 14 recommendations contained in the May 2005 report, 5 have been implemented, 1 was found to be not applicable, and the remaining have not been implemented.
35730 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Of the 14 recommendations contained in the May 2005 report, 5 have been implemented, 1 was found to be not applicable, and the remaining have not been implemented.
BASE
In: Nonprofit communications report: monthly communications ideas for nonprofits, Band 21, Heft 12, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8616
In: Nonprofit communications report: monthly communications ideas for nonprofits, Band 16, Heft 10, S. 3-3
ISSN: 2325-8616
SSRN
In: Middle East international: MEI, Band 539, S. 9
ISSN: 0047-7249
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 22, Heft 11, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 8-8
ISSN: 2325-8608
In: The major gifts report: monthly ideas to unlock your major gifts potential, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 7-7
ISSN: 2325-8608
Abstract: Analysis of Follow up Audit. This study aimed to explain the process of follow up audit in Sanggau local government by using management functions (planning, organizing, directing, and controlling) as the analysis instrument and identify problems that caused follow up audit was not optimal. This study used a qualitative approach with case study model and focused on OPD that still have unfinished findings. The selected informant is the Head of OPD; a technical official handling follows up audit and an Inspectorate official. The results of the study showed that there were some weaknesses in the process of follow up audit. For example, there was no specific policy about follow up audit, the slow responses of other parties in the process of coordination and the coordination between OPD and monitoring institution was not intensive; the leader was not able to give motivation, the low commitment of the leader, Difficulties in the evaluation process and the evaluation was not periodically, the role of TPTGR Assembly Consideration was not optimal, and the technical obstacles that was faced by OPD. Keyword: follow up audit, management function, planning, organizing, directing, controlling.Abstrak: Analisis Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan proses penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sanggau melalui pelaksanaan fungsi-fungsi manajemen (perencanaan, penggorganisasian, pengarahan, dan pengendalian) sebagai alat analisisnya, dan mengidentifikasi permasalahan yang menyebabkan belum optimalnya penyelesaian TLHP. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan model studi kasus dan difokuskan pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD) yang masih memiliki temuan yang belum tuntas. Informan yang dipilih, yaitu pimpinan OPD, salah satu pejabat teknis yang menangani TLHP dan salah satu pejabat Inspektorat daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat kelemahan dalam proses penyelesaian TLHP yang menyebabkan penyelesaian TLHP belum optimal, yaitu belum tersedianya kebijakan khusus tentang TLHP; lambatnya respon pihak lain dalam proses koordinasi dan belum intensifnya koordinasi antara OPD dan lembaga pengawasan; pimpinan belum mampu memberikan motivasi; kurangnya komitmen pimpinan; kesulitan dalam melakukan proses evaluasi dan tidak dilaksanakan evaluasi secara berkala; belum optimalnya peran Majelis Pertimbangan TPTGR; dan kendala-kendala teknis yang dihadapi oleh OPD. Kata Kunci: TLHP, Fungsi Manajemen, Perencanaan, Pengorganisasian, Pengarahan, Pengendalian.
BASE
This follow-up report by the Legislative Audit Council reviews the State Ports Authority (SPA). The audit objectives primarily focused on reviewing plans for port expansion and reviewing the SPA's operational efficiency.
BASE
In: Strengthening Integrity and Fighting Corruption in Education, S. 87-95
In: Vereinte Nationen: Zeitschrift für die Vereinten Nationen und ihre Sonderorganisationen, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 249-254
ISSN: 0042-384X
The report of the UN Fact Finding Mission headed by Richard Goldstone on the Gaza War of 2008/2009 contains substantial allegations against Israel and the Palestinian side for war crimes, and other human rights violations. It was the task of a Committee of Experts established by the Human Rights Council in March 2010 to inquire whether Israel and the Palestinians had carried out credible and genuine investigations into those allegations. While receiving a positive response from Palestinian authorities, the Committee failed in its efforts to win the cooperation of the Israeli government and was therefore prevented from entering Israel and the West Bank, consequently keeping them from engaging indirect talks with the responsible Israeli authorities. Notwithstanding, the availability of three official Israeli reports, the Committee concluded that, given the lack of sufficient evidence, it could not ascertain that Israel had acted in conformity with the relevant criteria. A report mandated by the Palestinian Authority showed a high degree of frankness while, in comparison, two reports of the de facto authorities in Gaza primarily confined themselves to bringing charges against Israel. Adapted from the source document.
In: Vereinte Nationen, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 249-254
In: Humanitäres Völkerrecht: Informationsschriften ; HuV-I = Journal of international law of peace and armed conflict, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 131-136
ISSN: 0937-5414
World Affairs Online
In: Smith College studies in social work, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 31-60
ISSN: 1553-0426