Suchergebnisse

"Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations." ; "April 29, 1959." ; At head of title: 86th Congress, 1st session. Committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Without thesis note. ; Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 1931. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"Address delivered before the graduating class of the University of Arizona, Tucson, on May 26, 1948." ; Cover title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Running title: World peace and foreign relations. ; At head of title: The American Legion: to promote peace and good will on earth. ; Includes bibliographies. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"Prepared by officials in various departments and agencies of the executive branch in collaboration with the staffs of the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Foreign Relations." ; At head of title: 92d Congress, 2d session. Joint committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: 85th Congress, 1st session. Committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.

The defining feature of foreign relations law is that it is distinct from domestic law. Courts have recognized that foreign affairs are political by their nature and thus unsuited to adjudication, that state and local involvement is inappropriate in foreign affairs, and that the President has the lead role in foreign policymaking. In other words, they have said that foreign relations are exceptional. But foreign relations exceptionalism — the belief that legal issues arising from foreign relations are functionally, doctrinally, and even methodologically distinct from those arising in domestic policy — was not always the prevailing view. In the early twentieth century, a revolution took place in foreign relations law. Under the intellectual leadership of Justice Sutherland, the Supreme Court adopted the idea that foreign affairs are an exceptional sphere of policymaking, separate from domestic law and best suited to exclusively federal, and primarily executive, control. The exceptionalist approach has dominated foreign relations law since that time, but it has always had questionable foundations. Since the end of the Cold War, there has been a second revolution in foreign relations law, one whose scope and significance rival the Sutherland revolution, but one that has gone largely unrecognized. Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court has increasingly rejected the idea that foreign affairs are different from domestic affairs. Instead, it has started treating foreign relations issues as if they were run-of-the-mill domestic policy issues, suitable for judicial review and governed by ordinary separation of powers and statutory interpretation principles. This "normalization†of foreign relations law has taken place in three waves. It began with the end of the Cold War and the rise of globalization in the 1990s. It continued — counterintuitively — during the war on terror, despite the strong case for exceptionalism in a time of exigency. And it has proceeded, during the Roberts Court, to ...

"March 1973." ; Prepared by the Foreign Affairs Division of the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress in collaboration with the staffs of the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Foreign Relations. ; At head of title: 93d Congress, 1st session. Joint committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Title from cover. ; Issued as Committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols. for 1957- printed for the use of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations; -1974 with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs; 1975-197 with the House Committee on International Relations.

Reprinted from the Department of State Bulletin of December 22, 1952 . ; Mode of access: Internet.

Description based on: 1950, v. 4. ; Document ed. not distributed to depository libraries except as part of United States congressional serial set. (Departmental ed. distributed as Supt. of Docs. class no. S.1.1:) ; Some v. in this ed. are also reprinted (including House document nos.) as part of: Foreign relations of the United States, Departmental ed. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Vols. for 1932- issued in pts. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: 94th Congress, 2d session. Joint committee print. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"March 1974." ; At head of title: 93d Congress, 2d session. Joint committee print. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.

A collection of laws and related materials. ; At head of title: 92d Congress, 1st session. Joint committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"April 20, 1970." ; A collection of laws and related materials. ; At head of title: 91st Congress, 2d session. Joint committee print. ; Mode of access: Internet.