Suchergebnisse

Détermination des hypothèses de différentiabilité permettant une réduction d'une forme différentielle extérieure fermée dans le voisinage d'un point d'une variété.

The ink was hardly dry upon the articles of German capitulation when leaders of the labor party in England precipitated a general election and raised the banner of state socialism. There is great ferment in France and the issue there is basically socialism on the one hand and private enterprise and a free economy on the other. Both state socialism and communism are as much forms of totalitarianism as fascism or naziism. Mr. Churchill has used plain words as to the issue in England. Honesty in thought and expression requires that the issue be bluntly stated. Make no mistake about it—any form of totalitarianism means a planned economy and a welfare government administered by bureaucrats regimenting the lives of the citizenry and reducing the citizen to a pawn and a ward of government.

Freedom and justice are regarded as by-products of the American way of life. This erroneous viewpoint is nourished by corporations, and it leads to irresponsibility. There is no adequate theory of the corporation or compre hension of the economic order, and the intellectuals are cul pable. Irresponsibility assumes many forms. The seductions of public relations and advertising serve unethical ends. Dis trust of government is encouraged by the corporation, which at the same time plays a clumsy and backward political role. The steady advance of technological unemployment is dismissed by managers as someone else's responsibility. For-profit enter prises are ill-suited to development of the emerging nations, partly because of earlier histories of irresponsibility. The de pendence of the economic order on the cold war is seldom criti cized by managers, who display no enthusiasm for disarmament or peace. Corporate life is seen as a species of neofeudalism which results in passivity and political nonparticipation. The essential problem is discovering a theory of economic order and purpose, and a theory of corporate responsibility adequate to the acceleration of contemporary technological society.

Freedom & justice are regarded as by-products of the US way of life. This erroneous viewpoint is nourished by corporations; there is no adequate theory of the corporation or comprehension of the econ order, & the intellectuals are culpable. This irresponsibility assumes many forms: (1) The seductions of public relations & advertising serve unethical ends; (2) Distrust of gov is encouraged by the corporation, which at the same time plays a clumsy & backward pol'al role; (3) The steady advance of technological unemployment is dismissed by managers as someone else's responsibility; (4) For-profit enterprises are ill-suited to development of the emerging nations, partly because of earlier histories of irresponsibility; (5) The dependence of the econ order on the cold war is seldom criticized by managers, who display no enthusiasm for disarmament or peace. Corporate life is seen as a species of neofeudalism which results in passivity & pol'al nonparticipation. The essential problem is discovering a theory of econ order & purpose, & a theory of corporate responsibility adequate to the acceleration of contemporary technological society. AA.