Search results
Filter
Format
Type
Language
More Languages
Time Range
2379 results
Sort by:
SSRN
Reporter: Gideon Rottem
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 89, p. 224-224
ISSN: 2169-1118
What Gideon Did
Many accounts of Gideon v Wainwright s legacy focus on what Gideon did not do--its doctrinal and practical limits. For constitutional theorists, Gideon imposed a preexisting national consensus upon a few "outlier" states, and therefore did not represent a dramatic doctrinal shift. For criminal procedure scholars, advocates, and journalists, Gideon has failed, in practice, to guarantee meaningful legal help for poor people charged with crimes. Drawing on original historical research, this Article instead chronicles what Gideon did-the doctrinal and institutional changes it inspired between 1963 and the early 1970s. Gideon shifted the legal profession's policy consensus on indigent defense away from a charity model toward a public model. By 1973, this new consensus had transformed criminal practice nationwide through the establishment of hundreds of public defender offices and the expansion of lawyers' presence in low-level criminal proceedings. This Article describes these changes primarily through the example of Massachusetts, while contextualizing that example with national comparisons. The broad outlines of these post-Gideon changes are familiar to legal scholars. But situating these changes in a longer historical context and tracing them in detailfrom the perspective of lawyers on the ground in the 1960s yields two insights that help to explain the seemingly permanent post-Gideon crisis in indigent defense. First, the post- Gideon transformation was indeed limited in its practical effects, but its limits derived not only from politics but also from history-and from the legal profession itself Lawyers themselves, long before Gideon, framed indigent defense as low-status, low-pay, less-than-fullyprofessional legal work. That framing survived even as private charities became post-Gideon public defenders. Second, the post- Gideon transformation was also limited-or, perhaps, destined to be perceived as limited-by tensions inherent in the attempt to provide large-scale legal assistance through government ...
BASE
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
DerMehrjahresplan "Gideon" - warum und wie
In: Europäische Sicherheit & Technik: ES & T ; europäische Sicherheit, Strategie & Technik, Volume 66, Issue 9, p. 52-56
ISSN: 2193-746X
World Affairs Online
SSRN
SSRN
Gideon Botsch, Die extreme Rechte
In: Jahrbuch Extremismus & Demokratie: (E & D), Volume 25, p. 275-278
ISSN: 0938-0256
Mikhael Subotzky and Gideon Mendel
In: Nka: journal of contemporary African art, Volume 2021, Issue 48, p. 159-159
ISSN: 2152-7792
Gideon Meir (1947–2021)
In: The Israel journal of foreign affairs, Volume 15, Issue 2, p. 309-312
ISSN: 2373-9789
Facing up to gideon
In: National civic review: promoting civic engagement and effective local governance for more than 100 years, Volume 54, Issue 7, p. 354-386
ISSN: 1542-7811
SSRN
Gideon Rachman - Britain's imperial hangover
In: The world today, Volume 68, Issue 7, p. 6-6
ISSN: 0043-9134