Local Liability in International Economic Law
In: 95 North Carolina Law Review 261 (2017)
57788 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 95 North Carolina Law Review 261 (2017)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Melbourne University Law Review, Band 32, Heft 44
SSRN
In: Ius et praxis: derecho en la región, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 163-183
ISSN: 0718-0012
In: Paul B. Larsen. Liability Limitation under National Law and the Liability Convention, 52 Space Law Coll
SSRN
In: The British yearbook of international law, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 337-362
ISSN: 2044-9437
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
In: Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 491
ISSN: 1805-2789
Air carriage liability for damage represents an essential issue of national and international transport, therefore it is regulated by national law (this article emphasizing Czech law), EU law and international law. Czech regulation consists of provisions of the Civil Code and the Aviation Act, mainly concerning operator's liability. Several key Regulations, representing EU law, cover many aspects, for example compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights. The Montreal Convention introduced two tiers of liability and the fifth jurisdiction.
In: Walter Frenz (ed.), Handbook Industry 4.0: Law, Technology, Society, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2022, pp. 217–239
SSRN
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 88, Heft 863, S. 665-691
ISSN: 1607-5889
AbstractThe fact that international humanitarian law violations are in the vast majority of cases prosecuted in criminal courts does not mean that a civil liability for these violations does not exist. This article seeks to explore the concept of civil liability of corporations involved in violations of international humanitarian law by providing an overview of the different legal issues raised by this concept and its implementation in both common law and continental law systems.
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 271-322
ISSN: 0017-8063
World Affairs Online
In: The urban lawyer: the national journal on state and local government law, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 1-62
ISSN: 0042-0905
In: Wake Forest Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law Vol. 20, No. 3
SSRN
In: State Power and Local Self-government, Heft 4, S. 36-38
In: European journal of international law, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 971-996
ISSN: 1464-3596
Abstract
The worldwide populist wave has contributed to a perception that international law is currently in a state of crisis. This article examines how far populist governments have challenged prevailing interpretations of international law. The article links structural features of populism with an analysis of populist governmental strategies and argumentative practices. It demonstrates that, in their rhetoric, populist governments promote an understanding of international law as a mere law of coordination. However, this is not entirely reflected in their legal practices where an instrumental, cherry-picking approach prevails. The article concludes that policies of populist governments affect the current state of international law on two different levels: in the political sphere, their practices alter the general environment in which legal rules are interpreted and, in the legal sphere, populist governments push for changes in the interpretation of established international legal rules. The article substantiates these propositions by focusing on the principle of non-intervention and foreign funding for non-governmental organizations.