Review Article : Germany and Europe: What Lessons from History?
In: European history quarterly, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 141-148
ISSN: 1461-7110
832041 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European history quarterly, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 141-148
ISSN: 1461-7110
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 147-157
ISSN: 1530-9177
In: Cold war history, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 135-156
ISSN: 1743-7962
To deal with the development of Cold War history means to summarize a part of international debates. Nevertheless, the (West) German approach originally had much to do with Allied responsibility of the German question, meaning partition in two states and the possibilities of re-unification. This meant that Cold War history in most cases placed the German question in the centre of research. Only since the 1970s a broader approach not only to European and transatlantic aspects emerged, but also to the inclusion of a world wide view. This was accompanied by the reception and advancement of international methodological debates. Adapted from the source document.
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 72, Heft 3, S. 338-355
The German and Russian nations share a long relationship. They fought the largest part of the world's largest ever war. Resonances of that conflict and the Cold War that followed it still permeate their contemporary relationship. Under very different political systems, however, "history" is interpreted and responded to very differently. Concern for status and image, as well as geostrategic factors, motivate Russian officialdom's disputing of the "post-Cold War order." Germany is viewed as the pivotal state and nation in Europe. Russia seeks to influence Germany's civil society and political elite in the attempt to obtain favourable policy outcomes. Sympathy for the Russian position within Germany is outweighed by disquiet regarding Russian foreign policy adventurism and its authoritarian regime more generally.
In: http://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11128300-4
Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Pol.g. 1076 s-1
BASE
In: Simmel studies, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 17-34
ISSN: 2512-1022
Among the classical authors of sociology, Émile Durkheim passed away the first on 15 November 1917. His conception of the war as well as his ideas of a possible way out of it, therefore, are far from the horizon of experience that characterized the last year of the conflict. His major war writing is a critical analysis of the intellectual sources of German militarism: L'Allemagne au-dessus de tout. Karsenti focuses on Durkheim's examination of the "Über-Ideology", which moulded German nationalism since unification in 1871, especially in the work of Heinrich von Treitschke. Durkheim's book is a censorship of the enemy's warfare. Yet, what is interesting to discover, according to Karsenti, is the particular perspective of Durkheim's investigation. The writing is a critique of all tendencies to reduce international politics to an "Über". Accordingly, for Durkheim, there is a possible way out of the war, yet it has to be read between the lines of his distinction between a "good and a bad tradition" of the moral sciences in Germany.
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 25, Heft 98, S. 282-298
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: International Affairs, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 52-53
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Cold war history, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 135-156
ISSN: 1743-7962
In: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 32-34
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 32-34
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: Politija: analiz, chronika, prognoz ; žurnal političeskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki = Politeía, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 147-158
ISSN: 2587-5914
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 361
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: International affairs, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 306-311
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 23